Wiki's definition of conspiracy (intent) that is prosecutable by law:
Quote:In the criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between natural persons to break the law at some time in the future, and, in some cases, with at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join "the plot" later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted and/or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence.
Anybody have any evidence of any kind the Saddam Hussein ever repented about anything?
Obama (and his devoted followers--is that an acceptable term Cyclop?) are quite naive in thinking that Saddam Hussein was a toothless tiger and would not have become quite dangerous again once restored to full international privileges. Further the well-intended sanctions to keep him in check until he did repent and cooperate with the UN inspectors to prove it were causing untold suffering for the Iraqi people. The most modest estimates are that 50,000 Iraqis, many or most children, died from malnutrition and neglect during the 12 years of sanctions. To have continued them would have been cruel and, in my opinion, unconscionable.
Whatever one believes about Iraq, how we got there, whatever evils may have occurred while we have been there, the only humane course of action now is to leave the Iraqi people with the power and resources to determine their own destiny.
McCain understands that.
I don't believe Obama or his devoted followers do.