A good way to restore the image of Jimmy Carter's presidency is to elect Obama.
H2O_MAN, oooh that kind of attack's gonna sway all the voters to McCain.
We just need to look at the current occupant of the white house to know that many are looking for "change." Even the polls show Bush has the lowest rating of any contemporary president - including Carter.
blueflame1 wrote:H2O_MAN, oooh that kind of attack's gonna sway all the voters to McCain.
A continuation of Jimmy Carters presidency should scare the hell out of most people.
cicerone imposter wrote: Even the polls show Bush has the lowest rating of any contemporary president - including Carter.
And the Democratic controlled house and senate are rated lower than GW.
H2O_MAN wrote:blueflame1 wrote:H2O_MAN, oooh that kind of attack's gonna sway all the voters to McCain.
A continuation of Jimmy Carters presidency should scare the hell out of most people.
Your fears are unfounded; Carter isn't running for president. You talking about McCain? He doesn't even know who's fighting in Iraq - or who's training the terrorists. The position he's seeking is way above his head, and we don't need another Bush.
Good evening. The map above shows GA as being a toss-up state. Cokie Roberts, who covers politics for NPR, had an observation this morning. Black voters and liberal voters in GA will go for Mr Obama in significant numbers. And then there is Mr Barr, the Libertarian. He is not expected to be a spoiler nationally, but he is from GA and, she suggested, the McCain campaign is worried that he might pull a couple or three percent away from Mr McCain. Enough, perhaps, to give that state to Mr Obama. Watch GA.
You have a fear of bush?
cicerone imposter wrote:H2O_MAN wrote:blueflame1 wrote:H2O_MAN, oooh that kind of attack's gonna sway all the voters to McCain.
A continuation of Jimmy Carters presidency should scare the hell out of most people.
Your fears are unfounded; Carter isn't running for president. You talking about McCain? He doesn't even know who's fighting in Iraq - or who's training the terrorists. The position he's seeking is way above his head, and we don't need another Bush.
Obama is not qualified for the job, he's not up to the pressure and we just don't need another Jimmy Carter as president.
H2O_MAN wrote: You have a fear of bush?
cicerone imposter wrote:H2O_MAN wrote:blueflame1 wrote:H2O_MAN, oooh that kind of attack's gonna sway all the voters to McCain.
A continuation of Jimmy Carters presidency should scare the hell out of most people.
Your fears are unfounded; Carter isn't running for president. You talking about McCain? He doesn't even know who's fighting in Iraq - or who's training the terrorists. The position he's seeking is way above his head, and we don't need another Bush.
Obama is not qualified for the job, he's not up to the pressure and we just don't need another Jimmy Carter as president.
Please show us how Obama is the mirror image of Carter?
Quinnipiac University poll
A Quinnipiac University poll, taken May 23-30, 2006, asked 1,534 registered American voters to pick the worst U.S. President of the last 61 years.[14]
1. George W. Bush (34%)
2. Richard Nixon (17%)
3. Bill Clinton (16%)
4. Jimmy Carter (13%)
5. Don't Know/No Answer (5%)
6. Lyndon Johnson (4%)
7. George H. W. Bush (3%)
8. Ronald Reagan (3%)
9. Gerald Ford (2%)
10. Harry Truman (1%)
11. John Kennedy (1%)
12. Dwight Eisenhower (<1%)
The poll was taken May 23-30, 2006!
That poll is worthless!
Carter was one of this nations worst presidents.
H2O_MAN wrote:The poll was taken May 23-30, 2006!
That poll is worthless!
Carter was one of this nations worst presidents.
Yes, it's worthless, because Bush will have a much larger number now.
gasp, I agree with H20. It must have been a slow week at Quinnipac. They needed to poll something. A totally worthless poll.
H2O_MAN wrote:cicerone imposter wrote: Even the polls show Bush has the lowest rating of any contemporary president - including Carter.
And the Democratic controlled house and senate are rated lower than GW.
I'll pretend you have an excuse for being this intellectually vacant, and let this slide. I'll in return just tell you the already posted fact that even though the house and senate are rated lower, the republicans are rated much lower than the democrats.
Nice half truth backfire Kevin.
T
K
O
Ranking the Presidents
Much has been done over the years to answer the question--"Who are the best and worst presidents of all time?" Here is our list below, with an explanation link to follow. Comment and tell us what you think! What does your "Top 42" look like?
"Legendary"
1) Franklin Roosevelt 2) Abraham Lincoln 3) George Washington
"Outstanding"
4) Thomas Jefferson 5) Dwight Eisenhower 6) Theodore Roosevelt
7) Woodrow Wilson 8) Harry Truman 9) John Kennedy
"Above Average"
10) John Adams 11) James Monroe 12) William McKinley
13) James Polk 14) James Madison 15) Ronald Reagan
16) Bill Clinton 17) Lyndon Johnson 18) John Quincy Adams
"Average"
19) Gerald Ford 20) Grover Cleveland 21) George H.W. Bush
22) William Howard Taft 23) Richard Nixon
"Below Average"
24) Andrew Jackson 25) Rutherford Hayes 26) Calvin Coolidge 27) Jimmy Carter
28) Martin Van Buren 29) Ulysses Grant 30) Chester Arthur 31) Zachary Taylor
32) Benjamin Harrison
"Regrettable"
33) George W. Bush 34) Herbert Hoover 35) John Tyler 36) Franklin Pierce
37) James Garfield 38) Warren Harding 39) James Buchanan
40) William Henry Harrison 41) Andrew Johnson 42) Millard Fillmore
Diest TKO wrote:
Nice half truth backfire Kevin.
niveK is a reflection making the truth whole.
In the last few decades, the worst ones were Clinton, Carter, and Johnson, probably in that order. Carter, I don't believe was corrupt, but just terrible in judgement, while Johnson and Clinton were two of the most corrupt presidents of all time, worse than Nixon by far.
The best would be Reagan and Eisenhower.
Nixon was the most hated president of modern times. The press wants Bush to be the most hated, but he just isn't, he is a great guy, and people will rate him much higher after he leaves office and they see how much worse it could have been without him.
After he leaves office, this country will be in a shambles; millions of families losing their homes and cars, their jobs, their health insurance, and the cost of fuel and food increasing so fast, many are struggling to make ends meet.
How you can even suggest he'll be remembered in positive terms because he's a great guy doesn't bring back the over four thousand military men and women who have lost their lives, and over 30,000 with mental and physical injuries that will never heal.
It's the first time in history that veterans are speaking out against their president. That's a new one for even Bush.
Good guys don't start unnecessary wars.
okie wrote:In the last few decades, the worst ones were Clinton, Carter, and Johnson, probably in that order. Carter, I don't believe was corrupt, but just terrible in judgement, while Johnson and Clinton were two of the most corrupt presidents of all time, worse than Nixon by far.
The best would be Reagan and Eisenhower.
Nixon was the most hated president of modern times. The press wants Bush to be the most hated, but he just isn't, he is a great guy, and people will rate him much higher after he leaves office and they see how much worse it could have been without him.
BRAVO !!
WELL SAID SIR
History will be kind to GW, if nothing else - he did protect the country from Owl Gore.
H2O_MAN wrote:Diest TKO wrote:
Nice half truth backfire Kevin.
niveK is a reflection making the truth whole.
Your posts are becoming more and more masturbatory. I'm sure you think you are a master debater.
Or just a another egocentric neocon masterbator.
T
K
O
