realjohnboy
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 05:41 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:


And why are the people who are fainting dressed all in black?

Cycloptichorn


And why do they all appear to be white fainters?
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 05:46 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
"Got faint?" is pretty lame but I thought "The actual content of hope is subject to change" was funny… and looking again; "Not available in all 57 States" is funny too.



OCCOM BILL wrote:
"Got faint?" is pretty lame but I thought "The actual content of hope is subject to change" was funny… and looking again; "Not available in all 57 States" is funny too.



That and the not so subtle shape formed by the people, the vodka ad cloning and the captioning of "thepeoplescube.com" which, if looked at, is political satire on communism and socialism.

Lots of "funny" stuff there.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 05:58 pm
realjohnboy wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:


And why are the people who are fainting dressed all in black?

Cycloptichorn


And why do they all appear to be white fainters?


you'll have to ask the kids over at http://thepeoplescube.com/

they'll take a whack at just about anyone








(gotta admit, I find most of their stuff amusing/funny, if more than occasionally mmmm, not acceptable in polite company)


http://thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=1858


http://thepeoplescube.com/images/Absolut_Bush_Hillary_Missio.jpg


(can't post the one I'd really like to, it's tooo ruuude for me to admit to liking Cool )
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 06:08 pm
Great picture from the town hall meeting in Nevada on the housing crisis there.

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a81/kos102/2008/Obama/obama-kid-denver.jpg


More here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/27/16015/7137/60/523713
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 06:21 pm
ehBeth wrote:
realjohnboy wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:


And why are the people who are fainting dressed all in black?

Cycloptichorn


And why do they all appear to be white fainters?


you'll have to ask the kids over at http://thepeoplescube.com/

they'll take a whack at just about anyone








(gotta admit, I find most of their stuff amusing/funny, if more than occasionally mmmm, not acceptable in polite company)


http://thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=1858


http://thepeoplescube.com/images/Absolut_Bush_Hillary_Missio.jpg


(can't post the one I'd really like to, it's tooo ruuude for me to admit to liking Cool )



I like that last photo! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 10:03 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 10:33 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
Great picture from the town hall meeting in Nevada on the housing crisis there.

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a81/kos102/2008/Obama/obama-kid-denver.jpg


More here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/27/16015/7137/60/523713
Sweet photo. Reminds me of:
Obama wrote:
I'm not talking about blind optimism here -- the almost willful ignorance that thinks unemployment will go away if we just don't talk about it, or the health care crisis will solve itself if we just ignore it. No, I'm talking about something more substantial. It's the hope of slaves sitting around a fire singing freedom songs; the hope of immigrants setting out for distant shores; the hope of a young naval lieutenant bravely patrolling the Mekong Delta; the hope of a mill worker's son who dares to defy the odds; the hope of a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too. The audacity of hope!
0 Replies
 
Robert Gentel
 
  1  
Tue 27 May, 2008 11:18 pm
sozobe wrote:
Thomas wrote:
This is not to suggest that Obama is another Bush, just that I'm not terribly impressed when he personally stays above the fray when his campaign does not.


OK... but has his campaign been trafficking in outrage, either?

Their immediate response was, "Sen. Clinton's statement before the Argus Leader editorial board was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign." Just that, I think. (If there was more, I haven't found it back.)

That's definitely saying "she made a gaffe," but doesn't seem particularly outraged.

Have they been manufacturing or expressing outrage beyond that?


I agree with Thomas here and have been repeatedly disappointed with the down and dirty politics from his campaign while he himself claims to be above it all.

In this particular case, yes, they did much more than their initial characterization of the comments as out of line (as opposed to simply poorly worded).

Bill Burton emailed his mailing list of reporters a link to an early story (NY Post) that connected the dots to an Obama assasination by mentioning Obama's early secret service detail. His campaign also emailed journalists Keith Olberman's rant on the subject.

Yes, they fanned the flames, and also took the opportunity to act magnanimous about it after the story played out. And if you look behind the headlines at the campaign interaction level (e.g. conference call timing etc) you'll see that they do this just about every time there's a "gotcha" to be had.

Obama's claim of being above "gotcha" politics only occasionally applies to himself and never applies to his campaign.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 05:26 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?



No, it just means he acknowledged the Vets at the venue and people looking for gotchas had to make something up.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 05:35 am
Hey Robert, good to see you here.

I think I answered already in this post:

sozobe wrote:
Thomas, I know what you mean, and I'm not sure you need to concede that point. I have been by and large happy with how Obama is conducting his campaign. I have no illusions of perfection or purity -- this IS politics. However I'm pretty satisfied that they have a line in mind that they haven't gone over and that they could have gone over many times -- a certain basic decency. (I think Hillary has gone over this line, less often than she is accused of but nonetheless more than once.) But I think they are willing to go right up TO that line if it is politically important.

For example, Hillary has been pushing the VP line hard lately. I firmly believe that Obama does not want her to be the VP, for a lot of reasons including (but not limited to) how she steps on his message ("Change, featuring a former two-term First Lady") and the spectre of Bill lurking around wanting to be a part of things.

But if she makes it abundantly clear she wants the VP position, and he just outright says "no," that's really dangerous for him in terms of uniting the party and bringing her supporters on board.

If this RFK thing is not only a gaffe but a Gaffe, then it becomes more obvious that of course he can't ask her to be VP.


They didn't lie, they didn't make anything up -- they went ahead and drew the press' attention to stuff from third parties (Olbermann). This is substantially different from Hillary's mailers re: his "present" votes on abortion issues in the Illinois State Senate, for example. (Mailers -- he's anti-abortion. Reality -- many of the "present" votes were strategic, and he did so at the request of abortion-rights groups.)
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 05:42 am
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 05:44 am
Lots of lists, charts and numbers at the link to accompany the article below.


http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/05/fl-mi-by-numbers_21.html

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

FL & MI By The Numbers

There are all sorts of scenarios concerning Florida and Michigan. Some recently discussed scenarios include seating all MI/FL pledged delegates with 1/2 vote, (supers at 1/2 or full vote), and a proposal by Michigan Dems propose 69-59 split. We've taken five of the most likely and interesting ones and run the numbers.

The scenarios are:


Do not seat Florida or Michigan. Current Official DNC rules
Seat FL 1/2 vote, MI 69-59 split and supers full vote.
Seat FL/MI all half votes, pledged and supers
FL/MI, pledged half vote, supers full vote
Seat FL & MI based on the elections that have taken place. This scenario is in the left sidebar.
Note that in scenarios 3-5, we assign 18 of the 55 Uncommitted Michigan delegates to Obama. 36 CD-level Uncommitted delegates have been selected, and we've found sufficient sources to place 18 of them in Obama's column. Some, or all, of the other 18, as well as the 19 state-wide Uncommitted delegates which will be picked on June 14, are said to be supporting Obama, but we have not found sufficient sources to add them to Obama's numbers as of now. We have not found any Uncommitted delegates who have said they are supporting Clinton.

We are not endorsing any of these scenarios. We're just providing information so our readers can judge how each scenario will affect the race.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 05:46 am
May 28, 2008
Superdelegate endorsements for Wednesday 5/28
Obama picks up two superdelegates overnight and leads today 2 to 0:

Oregon Democratic Chair Meredith Wood Smith

Colorado Democratic Chair Pat Waak
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 08:31 am
Butrflynet wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?



No, it just means he acknowledged the Vets at the venue and people looking for gotchas had to make something up.


Nothing made up there. He misspoke. Again. And Foxy pointed it out. Again. And you rose to his defense. Again. Nothing made up, and nothing out of the ordinary, really.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 08:50 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?



No, it just means he acknowledged the Vets at the venue and people looking for gotchas had to make something up.


Nothing made up there. He misspoke. Again. And Foxy pointed it out. Again. And you rose to his defense. Again. Nothing made up, and nothing out of the ordinary, really.


Nope, doesn't look like it.

Now, next time McCain 'misspeaks' - which should be anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour from now - we're going to see you jumping on him for it?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 08:53 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?



No, it just means he acknowledged the Vets at the venue and people looking for gotchas had to make something up.


Nothing made up there. He misspoke. Again. And Foxy pointed it out. Again. And you rose to his defense. Again. Nothing made up, and nothing out of the ordinary, really.


Nope, doesn't look like it.

Now, next time McCain 'misspeaks' - which should be anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour from now - we're going to see you jumping on him for it?

Cycloptichorn


No, but I expect to see you jumping on it. And so it goes ...
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 01:59 pm
Tico's avatar is in honor of Ahnold who now supports Tico's right to marry his boyfriend.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 08:30 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?



No, it just means he acknowledged the Vets at the venue and people looking for gotchas had to make something up.


Nothing made up there. He misspoke. Again. And Foxy pointed it out. Again. And you rose to his defense. Again. Nothing made up, and nothing out of the ordinary, really.


Of course! We all know that the only soldier worthy of acknowledgement on Memorial Day is a dead soldier.

The fact that Barack Obama chose to recognize the vets in the crowd in the first few sentences of his speech is totally indefensible. My gosh! How unpatriotic and unsupportive of our troops can the man get. I'll bet he wasn't even wearing a flag pin or holding his hand over his heart when he did it too. That's some nerve!
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 09:49 pm
Obama dogged by endorsements from the wrong people:

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/28/obama-dogged-by-praise-from-americas-foes/

"In a presidential race in which unwanted, damaging endorsements seem far more plentiful than endorsements that actually could help, Barack Obama has had the unfortunate distinction of being a magnet for such well-wishers.

The latest unsought praise for the Democratic front-runner came from Fidel Castro, who wrote in a column for Cuba's Granma newspaper Monday that Obama is "the most progressive candidate to the U.S. presidency.""
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Wed 28 May, 2008 10:07 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Butrflynet wrote:
So, what's the beef, that he knew that being a fallen hero does not require that you be dead? That he recognized the appropriateness of memorializing not only the dead but the sacrifices of the injured survivors?


Except -- historically -- Memorial Day is to commemorate America's dead soldiers, not the injured survivors.

I know The Rockstar is all about "change," but does that mean he gets to change the meaning of Memorial Day too?



No, it just means he acknowledged the Vets at the venue and people looking for gotchas had to make something up.


Nothing made up there. He misspoke. Again. And Foxy pointed it out. Again. And you rose to his defense. Again. Nothing made up, and nothing out of the ordinary, really.


Of course! We all know that the only soldier worthy of acknowledgement on Memorial Day is a dead soldier.

The fact that Barack Obama chose to recognize the vets in the crowd in the first few sentences of his speech is totally indefensible. My gosh! How unpatriotic and unsupportive of our troops can the man get. I'll bet he wasn't even wearing a flag pin or holding his hand over his heart when he did it too. That's some nerve!


This isn't rocket science, Butterflynet.

Memorial Day is to honor dead American soldiers. Let me know if you disagree with that statement.

Your hero said:

The Rockstar wrote:
On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes-I see many of them standing here today--our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.


"On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors it's unbroken line of fallen heroes ..."

Memorial Day is the day the nation honors dead solders; ergo, "fallen heroes" = dead solders -- except in the Bizarro Butterflynet world where Obama can do no wrong.

"-- I see many of them standing here today."

So, he either has developed a Sixth Sense, or the man came off message and MISSPOKE. It's clearly a struggle for you to come to grips with this possibility.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 884
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 01:36:39