Obama '08?

As fascinating as this dispute seems to be and all of these others issues being discussed, I can't find out how the wind seems to be blowing in either IN or NC for Obama. Has anyone any information?

George - that's all well and good but doesn't begin to clear up this latest aggravation:
http://www.able2know.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=3223489#322.

High Seas wrote:

Diest TKO wrote:

Cyclo - I get the analogy. I would however abandon it. In this case having a complex analogy only serves to help our conservative friends here account for their ideas.

.......If a budget is proposed on the floor of the senate or congress, the body may choose to approve or deny it. That's black and white. The truth is that most likely, they will instead approve a number they feel appropriate; something between $0.00 and whatever was requested. A grey amount.

No offense, Deist, but if you want to get your Bachelor's Degree (in aeronautical engineering, you claimed at one point) you have to drop this (wrong) approach to fuzzy logic and actually study for your final exams.

If you dropped out of college, never mind!

What is fuzzy logic about this? It's pretty direct. What's your beef?

BTW, it's Aerospace Engineering, and I only have one final left. 10 days until graduation.

T
K
O

BTW, it's Aerospace Engineering, and I only have one final left. 10 days until graduation.

The basic point here is that there is no simple, universal answer to the question of whether we should engage in public dialogue or negotiations with an unfriendly government, and that anyone on either side of the political debate who advocates such a simple answer is talking out of a non-standard orifice.

The basic point here is that there is no simple, universal answer to the question of whether we should engage in public dialogue or negotiations with an unfriendly government, and that anyone on either side of the political debate who advocates such a simple answer is talking out of a non-standard orifice.

georgeob1 wrote:

The basic point here is that there is no simple, universal answer to the question of whether we should engage in public dialogue or negotiations with an unfriendly government, and that anyone on either side of the political debate who advocates such a simple answer is talking out of a non-standard orifice.

Doesn't the outright refusal to talk with other nations defy this? If there is no universal approach/answer, then why limit our ability to approach a problem?

T
K
O

High Seas wrote:

George - that's all well and good but doesn't begin to clear up this latest aggravation:
http://www.able2know.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=3223489#322.

I'm not sure of your point here. [........]
(I was peripherally involved in the damage assessment following the Pollard case, and got these impressions then. I believe our boy Jonathan will die in Federal prison.)

Obama wins North Carolina; Networks call it as soon as polls close.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Obama wins North Carolina; Networks call it as soon as polls close.

Cycloptichorn

The question now becomes: what reason will HRC give when she declares that North Carolina isn't an important state after all?

plain truth is the black vote in NC would have gone to OJ Simpson

plain truth is the black vote in NC would have gone to OJ Simpson

I thought he won every category in NC except white people over 65...?

But Obama won every age group except voters 60 and older - by more than 35 points among those younger than 45. And Clinton's edge with seniors - she won voters 60 and older 54 to 43 percent - wasn't high enough to compensate.