Letter to the editor, the Scranton Times-Tribune, Pennsylvania:
Quote: Divide and promise
Editor: Finally a politician has said what so many Americans truly feel. Pennsylvania has become a state of bitterness, anger and resentment. Whereas this state represented the land of opportunity for millions of immigrants as late as 50 years ago, it has now become the center of nativism, failing cities and decreasing population.
In addition to our local challenges, Pennsylvanians see a government led by those with increasingly deep pockets for lobbyists, and with their proverbial thumb on the pulse of American values and concerns. Simply put, our politicians have failed to deliver on the promises set out by them when elected. Our last three presidents have not only failed to return Pennsylvania to its status as a keystone of the American economy, they have also damaged the faith of Americans in the office of the presidency. From promising no new taxes to looking for a definition of "is," to searching for WMD, our leaders have broken the emotional, political and governmental contract with the American people.
This occurs because politicians have discovered that the key to gaining power is divide and promise. Local politicians should be ashamed as they stoke the fires of nativism for political gain. [..] In addition to this, every politician has made unkept promises. However, accountability for these mistakes is nonexistent because they have developed techniques of distraction and division that keep Pennsylvanians from asking for (or discovering) the truth. This cannot stand anymore.
Barack Obama is a politician who provides Americans with a unique opportunity for change. [..] Political machine members (local and state) fear his message of change because he threatens the decades of cronyism that has hurt this area seriously. That is why they choose to support Sen. Hillary Clinton, a candidate whose record of mistruths rivals that of her husband and our current president.
Pennsylvania Democrats have an opportunity to shed the big brother/old boy network that is desperately trying to hold on to power. Yes, we are embittered by our experiences, but we are hopeful for the future with Barack Obama as president.
MICHAEL PERROTTI
LAKE WINOLA
Interesting how the narrative has changed on its side a bit here. Wasnt it just a month ago that Obama was derided for "hope-mongering", and his supporters mocked as a zeal-driven, hopelessly idealistic cult of believers? Hillary's camp was pressing the point that she was the realistic candidate, that she knew how to assess the shitstorm that was to come from the entrenched right when a Dem president would try to change stuff, and that Obama was just being naive with all his feel-good can-do bipartisan, bringing people together talk.
And she had a point, there.
Now, suddenly, Obama represents the sombre take-down on the anger and bitterness that exists in the country, and his supporters are proudly claiming the label - "hell yeah, I'm from Pennsylvania/etc, and I'm bitter about what's happened to this country! I'm angry about politicians!"
It's quite a turn-around -- and in the back of my mind, I'm thinking that maybe, this is not altogether a bad thing. Just as a correction to the previous overproportional tilt of the campaign to those in the electorate who feel secure, optimistic and confident about their prospects and what is all possible in politics. That kind of focus was always also going to just turn off some of the grittier-minded voters - it sure annoyed me, sometimes. Maybe this will actually end up just balancing out the campaign and its appeal a bit.