teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 06:17 am
Don't know what you're reading from, but I don't know that what you posted is fact. Even if it is, what does Barack Obama have to do with that? Re-read what I posted.

"I mean any person born of an American Mother and father. Any person born outside the United States of an American Mother and Father, automatically is considered an American and you knew that, just as I do. You just can't stand it when I'm right!"

I learned this fact in a Civics class, in the 6th grade! That you only had to be 35 years old, to run for President, etc. Back then, 35 was considered "old"! My generation didn't trust anyone over 30! I STILL don't!

Read before you accuse!

Note:
I was offline since last week. Had emegency surgery to remove gall bladder. For years, I was taking Nexium, for it. Just returned home, yesterday and trying to catch up. So I'm back. Now flame away, already!



okie wrote:
teenyboone wrote:


Maybe I'm the only one who has the guts to say it! It IS a country founded by whites FOR whites, the way it's being run. What about the "natives", Indians as Columbus mistakenly called them? Their whole country has been taken, FOR the white man! When I say native, and you know what I mean by being facetious,
Cool

What about the Spaniards that took Mexico and killed many of the Indians down there? What about the Spaniards that intermarried with Indians? And so what about immigrants from Mexico, do we filter out the ones with Spanish heritage vs. the true Indians? What about the Indians that came later and killed off natives, such as the Navajos. before white man even got to Arizona and New Mexico? After all, they apparently came in later from the north and conquered and drove out the ancestral pueblo people that came from the south much much earlier. What about whites that inter-married with natives? What are they, Americans or imposters?

As a matter of fact, what about Obama? Is he only half American, or not even that? Come to think of it, why didn't you mention this earlier? Since Obama is half white, and not native, he must not be qualified to even live here, let alone run for president.
Cool
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 06:19 am
Gee, thanks!

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
okie wrote:
teenyboone wrote:


Maybe I'm the only one who has the guts to say it! It IS a country founded by whites FOR whites, the way it's being run. What about the "natives", Indians as Columbus mistakenly called them? Their whole country has been taken, FOR the white man! When I say native, and you know what I mean by being facetious, I mean any person born of an American Mother and father. Any person born outside the United States of an American Mother and Father, automatically is considered an American and you knew that, just as I do. You just can't stand it when I'm right!
Cool

What about the Spaniards that took Mexico and killed many of the Indians down there? What about the Spaniards that intermarried with Indians? And so what about immigrants from Mexico, do we filter out the ones with Spanish heritage vs. the true Indians? What about the Indians that came later and killed off natives, such as the Navajos. before white man even got to Arizona and New Mexico? After all, they apparently came in later from the north and conquered and drove out the ancestral pueblo people that came from the south much much earlier. What about whites that inter-married with natives? What are they, Americans or imposters?

As a matter of fact, what about Obama? Is he only half American, or not even that? Come to think of it, why didn't you mention this earlier? Since Obama is half white, and not native, he must not be qualified to even live here, let alone run for president.


But teeny has guts!

He/she apparently doesn't know that "A 1996 survey[64] revealed that more American Indians in the United States preferred American Indian to Native American" Source
Cool Cool
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 06:22 am
snood wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
teeny is good for a laugh... and with the way thngs are going.... that's all we have left...


"We", who disgruntled burnout guy?



Now that's what I'm talking about! Who is WE? Cool
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 06:24 am
okie wrote:
kickycan wrote:
okie wrote:
http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-i-am-pretty-darned-good-politician/

Laughing

Put on your high topped wadin boots, people, its gettin deep out there.


Thank you Okie. That was hilarious. I was trying to figure out which one of those responses beneath the video is you. My guess is this person:

Quote:
Comment by REDNECK WOMAN
April 16th, 2008 at 10:59 pm

Then why couldn't b.o. answer the question tonight about wearing a flag pen???? why couldn;t he just straight forward with an answer??? dont forget,,, b.o. is a member of that church,, wright was his mentor for 20 yrs, and even though rev wright served this country,, he must hate this country because he is the one that said g.d. america,, and that we are the ones that flew those planes into the buildings,,, this is just plain wrong! why do thet want to give farrakahn an award??? does that sound patrotic to you? no!! b.o. wont even put his hand on his heart when the anthem is playing,, I DO. do you?? yes I am patriotic,,, my son is still in the army,, stationed in the states for now,, he could be sent back this year,,, I am proud to be an american, I cant help it if there are draft dodgers,, I only know the honor of our men of today. b.o. should wear a flag somewhere,, but if he doesn;t,,,, then he IS NOT PATRIOTIC


That is so you! You are REDNECK WOMAN, aren't you, Okie? I'm right aren't I?

You've not been right about much of anything so far, and your theory here is no better.


It's not you? You are a redneck woman though, right? At least give me that much.
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 06:35 am
You know something? That fact isn't wasted on Obama alone! MOST intelligent people, choose their friends carefully, especially today! When I was growing up, you were judged by the company you kept, where you lived, how you dressed, manners, etc. With the 60's generation, they questioned and defied authority, questioned the "status quo" and found it to be as corrupt as it is, today! Just the names have changed. Racism and a dual system, is still in operation, less Jim Crow, but repugs, know how to manipulate the system, skirt civil rights laws, to tilt the scales in their favor and an "in your face" attitude!

These were the "losers" of the 60's. The people NO-ONE wanted to be around or with! Today, they carry guns and just blow you away, as in Col,umbine and Oklahoma City. Home-grown terrorists, born and bred in the suburbs of "white flight"! The place many of you flew to, to escape the inner city, when the "terror" was bred BY you!

okie wrote:
Has this been posted? Article by Thomas Sowell on Obama:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/ThomasSowell/2008/03/26/the_audacity_of_rhetoric

some quotes:

"Barack Obama's own account of his life shows that he consciously sought out people on the far left fringe. In college, "I chose my friends carefully," he said in his first book, "Dreams From My Father."

These friends included "Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk rock performance poets" -- in Obama's own words -- as well as the "more politically active black students." He later visited a former member of the terrorist Weatherman underground, who endorsed him when he ran for state senator."


"In Shelby Steele's brilliantly insightful book about Barack Obama -- "A Bound Man" -- it is painfully clear that Obama was one of those people seeking a racial identity that he had never really experienced in growing up in a white world. He was trying to become a convert to blackness, as it were -- and, like many converts, he went overboard.

Nor has Obama changed in recent years. His voting record in the U.S. Senate is the furthest left of any Senator. There is a remarkable consistency in what Barack Obama has done over the years, despite inconsistencies in what he says.

The irony is that Obama's sudden rise politically to the level of being the leading contender for his party's presidential nomination has required him to project an entirely different persona, that of a post-racial leader who can heal divisiveness and bring us all together.

The ease with which he has accomplished this chameleon-like change, and entranced both white and black Democrats, is a tribute to the man's talent and a warning about his reliability."
Cool
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 06:47 am
okie wrote:
Setanta wrote:
God it's hilarious to see the reactionaries talking about someone and claiming they're socialist. Obama may be to the left of Francisco Franco, but that's about it. People like Okie seem to think that not being as far right as Genghis Kahn makes you a pinko . . .

Okay, laugh, I am just observing the obvious, that if you don't want a leftist in office, do not vote for Obama, thats all. Don't say nobody warned you concerning the election. If you want a leftist, vote Obama.

Is being left, a disease? Look what being "right" brought us; from a surplus, to a deficit, war in 2 countries, 4000 deaths, thousands of GI's maimed, Katrina, Rita, Blackwater, Pedophiles in government, pandering to lobbyists, Enron, The Walter Reed Scandal, The airport bathroom scandal, Gingrich, the hypocrite and other Bush Scandals! Satisfied? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:03 am
revel wrote:
Quote:
More broadly, Obama argued that Clinton's approach was the very thing his campaign was meant to change. [..] "The problem that we have in our politics, which is fairly typical, is that you take one person's statement, if it's not properly phrased, and you just beat it to death. And that's what Sen. Clinton's been doing over the last four days," he said.

He expressed sympathy for criticism Clinton has received over the years from political opponents.

"But the problem is that that's the kind of politics that we've been accustomed to," he said. "And I think Sen. Clinton learned the wrong lesson from it, because she's adopting the same tactics. What the American people want are not distractions. They want to figure out how are we actually going to deliver on healthcare; how are we going to deliver better jobs for people; how are we doing to improve their incomes; how are we going to send them to college?"


Word!
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:12 am
One of the things Obama wanted to convey last night was that he is not guilty by association with people like Keyes and Wright. That while he may be friends with those people, he does not seek their advice or counsel. It was a good answer to the question, but left me wondering about his judgement.

Now, I don't expect either Keyes or Wright will have much to say about Obama's Presidency (should he be elected), but Obama's judgement in his associations must be suspect. Who will Obama choose to be in his cabinet? Can we risk Obama's judgement to be sound in making those decisions?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:14 am
Letter to the editor, the Scranton Times-Tribune, Pennsylvania:

Quote:
Divide and promise

Editor: Finally a politician has said what so many Americans truly feel. Pennsylvania has become a state of bitterness, anger and resentment. Whereas this state represented the land of opportunity for millions of immigrants as late as 50 years ago, it has now become the center of nativism, failing cities and decreasing population.

In addition to our local challenges, Pennsylvanians see a government led by those with increasingly deep pockets for lobbyists, and with their proverbial thumb on the pulse of American values and concerns. Simply put, our politicians have failed to deliver on the promises set out by them when elected. Our last three presidents have not only failed to return Pennsylvania to its status as a keystone of the American economy, they have also damaged the faith of Americans in the office of the presidency. From promising no new taxes to looking for a definition of "is," to searching for WMD, our leaders have broken the emotional, political and governmental contract with the American people.

This occurs because politicians have discovered that the key to gaining power is divide and promise. Local politicians should be ashamed as they stoke the fires of nativism for political gain. [..] In addition to this, every politician has made unkept promises. However, accountability for these mistakes is nonexistent because they have developed techniques of distraction and division that keep Pennsylvanians from asking for (or discovering) the truth. This cannot stand anymore.

Barack Obama is a politician who provides Americans with a unique opportunity for change. [..] Political machine members (local and state) fear his message of change because he threatens the decades of cronyism that has hurt this area seriously. That is why they choose to support Sen. Hillary Clinton, a candidate whose record of mistruths rivals that of her husband and our current president.

Pennsylvania Democrats have an opportunity to shed the big brother/old boy network that is desperately trying to hold on to power. Yes, we are embittered by our experiences, but we are hopeful for the future with Barack Obama as president.

MICHAEL PERROTTI
LAKE WINOLA


Interesting how the narrative has changed on its side a bit here. Wasnt it just a month ago that Obama was derided for "hope-mongering", and his supporters mocked as a zeal-driven, hopelessly idealistic cult of believers? Hillary's camp was pressing the point that she was the realistic candidate, that she knew how to assess the shitstorm that was to come from the entrenched right when a Dem president would try to change stuff, and that Obama was just being naive with all his feel-good can-do bipartisan, bringing people together talk.

And she had a point, there.

Now, suddenly, Obama represents the sombre take-down on the anger and bitterness that exists in the country, and his supporters are proudly claiming the label - "hell yeah, I'm from Pennsylvania/etc, and I'm bitter about what's happened to this country! I'm angry about politicians!"

It's quite a turn-around -- and in the back of my mind, I'm thinking that maybe, this is not altogether a bad thing. Just as a correction to the previous overproportional tilt of the campaign to those in the electorate who feel secure, optimistic and confident about their prospects and what is all possible in politics. That kind of focus was always also going to just turn off some of the grittier-minded voters - it sure annoyed me, sometimes. Maybe this will actually end up just balancing out the campaign and its appeal a bit.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:27 am
McGentrix wrote:
One of the things Obama wanted to convey last night was that he is not guilty by association with people like Keyes and Wright. That while he may be friends with those people, he does not seek their advice or counsel. It was a good answer to the question, but left me wondering about his judgement.

Now, I don't expect either Keyes or Wright will have much to say about Obama's Presidency (should he be elected), but [w]ho will Obama choose to be in his cabinet? Can we risk Obama's judgement to be sound in making those decisions?

Fair question.

I guess one way to start considering this question is by looking who he has taken on as advisors in his campaign.

The National Journal wrote:

Quote:
Although Obama has had a solidly liberal voting record in the Senate -- the most liberal record in 2007, according to an analysis by National Journal -- his policy advisers tend to be moderates. Indeed, Obama explains his roll-call record as a product of votes that push senators to one extreme or the other, and he maintains that his presidency would move the nation into a less ideological, more cooperative era.

What follow are mini-profiles of many of the key players on Obama's political and policy squads.

If you want to get an idea of what kind of people would be advising him as President, it may be better to skip the campaign managers under the heading "Politics" and move to the sections on economics, immigration, national security etc.

For additional info, TNR had an article up last month called The Audacity of Data, with the top line: "Barack Obama's surprisingly non-ideological policy shop."

It's mostly on economics, foreign policy and generally the strategical approach of the Obama camp to policy, which is branded as "pragmatical, non-ideological".

Which is kinda discouraging for me, but should be reassuring to you...
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:31 am
nimh wrote:
It's quite a turn-around -- and in the back of my mind, I'm thinking that maybe, this is not altogether a bad thing.


Yep, I'm thinking along those lines too, nimh. On the 13th, I wrote:

sozobe wrote:
I think I like this debate (the "bitter" thing).

1.) It keeps newspapers, pundits, etc. from saying that it's all over for Hillary shortly before the PA primary. I think that helps her, mobilizes a certain "it ain't over yet!!" crowd.

2.) The attempt is to paint Obama as elitist, but he's actually saying something pretty sympathetic to PA voters. I mean, her campaign is handing out stickers that say "I'm not bitter;" is that actually true? How are people going to react to being told that they're not bitter? Isn't that the worst of what people have accused Obama of with the "hope" stuff?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:37 am
Zogby has Clinton and Obama in a dead heat in PA. Unfortunately, ti is Zogby who had Obama winning Ohio.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:41 am
Obama makes it hard for people to want to vote for him when he sends his wife to campaign for him, instead of showing up himself.
Hillary was in Evansville a few weeks ago (an event I went to), but Obama sent his wife here instead of showing up himself.

Apparently he doesnt realize that people would rather hear him speak for himself instead of thru surrogates.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:45 am
It was all Bill and Michelle at events yesterday, while Hillary and Barack prepared for the debate.

I'd be very surprised if Barack Obama doesn't show up before your primary. Columbus saw 3 Barack Obama appearances and 1 Michelle Obama appearance before ours.

Just checked, you're May 20th? Plenty of time.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:51 am
sozobe wrote:
It was all Bill and Michelle at events yesterday, while Hillary and Barack prepared for the debate.

I'd be very surprised if Barack Obama doesn't show up before your primary. Columbus saw 3 Barack Obama appearances and 1 Michelle Obama appearance before ours.

Just checked, you're May 20th? Plenty of time.


Indiana is May 6.
Evansville is in Indiana, about 45 minutes away from here.
As far as I know, both Hillary and Obama have no plans to come to this part of KY, so seeing them in Evansville was the only opportunity any of the tri-state voters will have to see them.

FYI, the tri-state is the area where In, Il, and KY all meet.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:55 am
OK, then May 6th.

Hillary has been dispatching surrogates galore -- Bill is the most obvious one, but also Chelsea and local ones like Rendell. Barack Obama has been all over the place too, and I'd be surprised if he's not in Evansville before May 6th.

His appearances in Columbus were typically advertised a few days beforehand (same with Hillary's appearances here).
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:55 am
Are there many "bitter" folks down there? Laughing
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 07:58 am
mysteryman wrote:
Obama makes it hard for people to want to vote for him when he sends his wife to campaign for him, instead of showing up himself.
Hillary was in Evansville a few weeks ago (an event I went to), but Obama sent his wife here instead of showing up himself.

Apparently he doesnt realize that people would rather hear him speak for himself instead of thru surrogates.

Can't be everywhere at once. If Obama is in Evansville, then he is not in Pittsburg and those voters are pissed. Campaigns routinely send surrogates out to extend the message.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 08:07 am
mysteryman wrote:
sozobe wrote:
It was all Bill and Michelle at events yesterday, while Hillary and Barack prepared for the debate.

I'd be very surprised if Barack Obama doesn't show up before your primary. Columbus saw 3 Barack Obama appearances and 1 Michelle Obama appearance before ours.

Just checked, you're May 20th? Plenty of time.


Indiana is May 6.
Evansville is in Indiana, about 45 minutes away from here.
As far as I know, both Hillary and Obama have no plans to come to this part of KY, so seeing them in Evansville was the only opportunity any of the tri-state voters will have to see them.

FYI, the tri-state is the area where In, Il, and KY all meet.


Would you be one of those bitter small town folks who is sitting around reading his Bible and cleaning his guns? Smile

Seriously re the debate last night, I thought Obama didn't do as well as usual; however, I also think he didn't get a fair shake from the moderators who were directing far more stuff at him than they were Clinton.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Thu 17 Apr, 2008 08:14 am
mysteryman wrote:
As far as I know, both Hillary and Obama have no plans to come to this part of KY, so seeing them in Evansville was the only opportunity any of the tri-state voters will have to see them.

There's no way of knowing that he wont get to your part of KY or the neighbouring part of IN anymore before May 6 / 20. Just look at the NYT's page on Candidate Schedules - there's not much there beyond the next couple of days. Too early to be resentful.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 765
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.54 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 07:34:38