kickycan
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:36 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
" For such false apostles are deceitful workmen, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no wonder: for Satan himself transformeth himself into an angel of light." - 2 Corinthians 11:13-14 :wink:

the bible, although probably not the infallible word of God... recognizes and gives us lots of hints about how to detect bullshit. Sort of a guidebook, although a human one written by humans.


In other words: If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you can be reasonably sure it is a porcupine.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:43 am
BPB wrote-

Quote:
Now, since you were a rabid Hillary supporter who switched to a rabid Obama supporter as soon as he pulled ahead...


Very tasty BPB
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:43 am
if you say so kicky my friend...again i repeat.... time will tell...
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:44 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Gosh, you know BPB is desperate when he starts quoting scripture.

Give it up. Your candidate is toast.



I have my references...

btw, your candidate is toast as well in the general and I take no pleasure at all in saying so.



Um, you have a reference for that, I assume.

Correction he is not my candidate, he is (will be) the nominee of my party. Something that neither you nor the Clintons understand.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:53 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Roxxxanne wrote:
Gosh, you know BPB is desperate when he starts quoting scripture.

Give it up. Your candidate is toast.


I have acknowledged that Obama will probably get the nomination for the last two weeks all over this forum... and I quote scripture fairy regularly.... I also quote from other sources when they seem to fit the situation.

I have my references... you have Mystery Science Theater.

btw, your candidate is toast as well in the general and I take no pleasure at all in saying so.

Now, since you were a rabid Hillary supporter who switched to a rabid Obama supporter as soon as he pulled ahead...can we expect you to become a rabid McCain supporter soon? Of course where roxx is concerned rabid is always the operative word...

You sure seem to have a lot of trouble making up your mind about who you are.....


You have a crystal ball, which alerts you to the future? I didn't know that!

Obama isn't 'toast' in the general. Not by a long shot. His polling has remained mostly even from where it was, and will rise back up again once he is the Dem. nominee.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:57 am
Head to head polls mean nothing until the race is actually head to head. I saw a recent poll whcih asked if people preferred the Democratic candidate or the Republican candidate in Nov and the Dems won like 60% to 40%.

And the turnout will dictate a Dem win (Obama already has more primary voters in history, chew on that!) unless, of course, Hillary finds a way to steal the nomination.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:58 am
Here's the Gallup tracking poll.

http://media.gallup.com/poll/graphs/election2008_HP_DemRace.gif

You will note that Obama is once again in the lead. Wow, doesn't seem too toasty yet, and we're near ground zero of the event.

Here's the Rasmussen poll:

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history

You'll note that Obama has barely moved at all in this poll. No more so then the fluctuations of the weeks before this.

It's scare tactics. 'He's toast! He can't win!' Bullshit. He can win, and he isn't toast. You just want him to be, because it isn't your candidate who is under discussion, and some part of you is happy to say it.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:00 am
Quote:
Obama isn't 'toast' in the general. Not by a long shot. His polling has remained mostly even from where it was, and will rise back up again once he is the Dem. nominee.

Cycloptichorn


Unless the Hillary supporters and the independents that support him now DONT vote for him in Nov.

So since we dont know anything for sure yet, I will repeat your own words...

Quote:
You have a crystal ball, which alerts you to the future?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:02 am
funny how my opinions and predictions are **** while those of the disciples are gospel? Laughing
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:07 am
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
Obama isn't 'toast' in the general. Not by a long shot. His polling has remained mostly even from where it was, and will rise back up again once he is the Dem. nominee.

Cycloptichorn


Unless the Hillary supporters and the independents that support him now DONT vote for him in Nov.

So since we dont know anything for sure yet, I will repeat your own words...

Quote:
You have a crystal ball, which alerts you to the future?


Reposting from another thread.

Quote:
Okay, before McCain got the nominee, the amount of posters on Republican message boards claiming they would never vote for him, was absolutely huge. I personally read hundreds of them. The vast majority of these people have fallen into line, and the vast majority of Dems will fall into line as well.

It's a rhetorical tool. When you are arguing a position, to claim the dire consequences of the undesired outcome happens. Voters have one real threat, and that's to withhold or change their vote. It's extremely common to see people, especially those without much debate experience, falling into that roll.

I'm not worried in the slightest, and I have no idea why most here would be at all. McCain is going to get clobbered by either candidate. Can you imagine him trying to debate domestic policy in depth with either one? Or even foreign policy? He's tied to Bush at the hip, supporting everything Bush supports. We're gonna slaughter em!

Cycloptichorn


Some of the hardcore Hillary supporters won't vote Dem, just as some Republicans won't vote for McCain. But the number will be very small. The majority will solidify behind their candidate once they begin a much more critical examination of the true opponent: in this case, Bush term three.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:14 am
Quote:
McCain is going to get clobbered by either candidate.


Yet all of the recent polls suggest exactly the opposite.
McCain is either running very close or slightly ahead of both of the dem candidates (depending on what poll you look at).
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:20 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
... in this case, Bush term three.


I suppose that will be the claim of the anti-Republican folks such as yourself. I doubt, however, that the claim will stick.



Can you remind me again what Republican values you had in mind when you voted for Bush?
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:23 am
I think there will be more boneheaded blunders like the Sunni-Shiite confusion earlier this week and sooner or later somebody's gotta ask about HIS tax returns, which he hasn't released.

He's supposed to be a military expert, policy expert, and he can't get these facts straight in his head? I don't know about you but that damn sure scared me.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 11:27 am
eoe wrote:
I think there will be more boneheaded blunders like the Sunni-Shiite confusion earlier this week and sooner or later somebody's gotta ask about HIS tax returns, which he hasn't released.

He's supposed to be a military expert, policy expert, and he can't get these facts straight in his head? I don't know about you but that damn sure scared me.


Oh I think the facts on that stuff are straight enough in his head. But in hundreds of thousands of words all expressed with media microphones close at hand, everybody is going to misspeak or say something backwards from time to time. Take Obama's 10,000 dead from the tornados thing for instance. Ignorance? Or misspeak?

I give ANYBODY benefit of the doubt on something like that because we all are capable of making that kind of error in contemporaneous remarks.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 12:21 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Oh I think the facts on that stuff are straight enough in his head. But in hundreds of thousands of words all expressed with media microphones close at hand, everybody is going to misspeak or say something backwards from time to time. Take Obama's 10,000 dead from the tornados thing for instance. Ignorance? Or misspeak?



Sure. But we're talking about the guy who has been singing "bomb bomb Iran" (merely joking, of course), who said that he was perfectly fine with 100 years of occupation of Iraq, who said that in his opinion Americans were fine with 10,000 years of American occupation of Iraq, and who is on the record saying that he would have gone into Iraq even if he had known that there were no WMD.

At some point, the "I misspoke" excuse sounds a little bit lame.

---

Also, McCain is running on a platform of him being the military expert, the guy who can handle the mess in Iraq, the ideal candidate to become Commander in Chief.

If Hillary or Obama were running on a similar platform of military expertise - would you be equally willing to give them the benefit of doubt if they had mixed up Syria and Iran, Shiites and Sunnis, Shiite militia and Al Qaeda?

I don't think so.


(And hey, isn't one presidency where a guy mistakenly invaded the wrong country enough for you?)
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 12:21 pm
Foxy wrote-

Quote:
I give ANYBODY benefit of the doubt on something like that because we all are capable of making that kind of error in contemporaneous remarks.


I'm not. I don't talk about things I don't know about and I'm not bothered about admitting I don't know the answer to a question.

I've read some stuff about the Sunni-Shiite business and nobody has shown the slightest sign of knowing about that. Answers on that point rely on the questioner having no idea either.

It showed me, for example, the real reason there was all that shouting at Saddam's execution.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 12:23 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:

You have a crystal ball, which alerts you to the future? I didn't know that!

Obama isn't 'toast' in the general. Not by a long shot. His polling has remained mostly even from where it was, and will rise back up again once he is the Dem. nominee.

Cycloptichorn

The polling against Clinton really doesn't mean much. Clinton and Obama may poll about the same against each other, but the electability of either one of them in November, I believe is draining away with each passing day. Maybe someday the Democrats will learn to come up with a decent candidate so that they can win in November?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 12:38 pm
old europe wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Oh I think the facts on that stuff are straight enough in his head. But in hundreds of thousands of words all expressed with media microphones close at hand, everybody is going to misspeak or say something backwards from time to time. Take Obama's 10,000 dead from the tornados thing for instance. Ignorance? Or misspeak?



Sure. But we're talking about the guy who has been singing "bomb bomb Iran" (merely joking, of course), who said that he was perfectly fine with 100 years of occupation of Iraq, who said that in his opinion Americans were fine with 10,000 years of American occupation of Iraq, and who is on the record saying that he would have gone into Iraq even if he had known that there were no WMD.

At some point, the "I misspoke" excuse sounds a little bit lame.

---

Also, McCain is running on a platform of him being the military expert, the guy who can handle the mess in Iraq, the ideal candidate to become Commander in Chief.

If Hillary or Obama were running on a similar platform of military expertise - would you be equally willing to give them the benefit of doubt if they had mixed up Syria and Iran, Shiites and Sunnis, Shiite militia and Al Qaeda?

I don't think so.


(And hey, isn't one presidency where a guy mistakenly invaded the wrong country enough for you?)


I am not you OE, so I try not to zero in on one picadillo and make a big deal out of it in order to embarrass or trash somebody. I believe I have and I would give Obama or Clinton the same benefit of the doubt on what was obviously a misspeak in unscripted remarks.

I prefer to put things into their proper context and, while I am by no means infallable, I do try not to use people's words dishonestly.

Debating whether Obama, Clinton, or McCain would make the more accomplished Commander in Chief is a valid issue to discuss. Using a misstated phrase, unsupported by any other context, as any kind of evidence of anything other than normal human fallibility to me smacks of smear tactics from a fanatically partisan ideologue.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 12:46 pm
kickycan wrote:
I have a question for the people who think this Pastor Wright thing is such a big deal. What exactly do you think is going to happen? Do you think Obama's going to get sworn in as the president and turn to the podium and suddenly start laughing diabolically, burn an American flag right there in the Rose Garden, and start ranting about how stupid all you whities are and how Goddammed racist America deserved 9-11?

Just wondering.

He won't start laughing and burn the flag, but if he really does harbor ill feelings toward the country, no telling what he would do in regard to many issues. Would you turn over your house to somebody that despises your guts for 4 years, or at least to someone that doesn't really care about you, or maybe he only cares about part of your house, or what if that someone thinks you owe him something, or what if that someone really doesn't like you or your house very well? Would you feel comfortable with that?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Sat 22 Mar, 2008 12:53 pm
okie wrote:
kickycan wrote:
I have a question for the people who think this Pastor Wright thing is such a big deal. What exactly do you think is going to happen? Do you think Obama's going to get sworn in as the president and turn to the podium and suddenly start laughing diabolically, burn an American flag right there in the Rose Garden, and start ranting about how stupid all you whities are and how Goddammed racist America deserved 9-11?

Just wondering.

He won't start laughing and burn the flag, but if he really does harbor ill feelings toward the country, no telling what he would do in regard to many issues. Would you turn over your house to somebody that despises your guts for 4 years, or at least to someone that doesn't really care about you, or maybe he only cares about part of your house, or what if that someone thinks you owe him something, or what if that someone really doesn't like you or your house very well? Would you feel comfortable with that?


He does not harbor ill feelings towards our country and he will do what is best for the country or at least try his best.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 667
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.33 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 09:40:20