FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:05 pm
I wasn't really surprised by this, for some strange reason.

Huckabee defends Wright
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:07 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
What's the thing you think he's hiding?


that race is a huge motivating force for him... that he's played and manipulated the race card from day one to make himself palatable to blacks and whites and to mask the fact that he has not more vision or hope than any other in the race... he's done a great job... I don't think that makes him better or worse than any other slimy politician... it just makes him the same...


Just a feeling, or is there something specific that gives you this impression?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:08 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
I wasn't really surprised by this, for some strange reason.

Huckabee defends Wright


Yeah McCain defended Obama re Wright too.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:23 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
What's the thing you think he's hiding?


that race is a huge motivating force for him... that he's played and manipulated the race card from day one to make himself palatable to blacks and whites and to mask the fact that he has not more vision or hope than any other in the race... he's done a great job... I don't think that makes him better or worse than any other slimy politician... it just makes him the same...


Just a feeling, or is there something specific that gives you this impression?


Sorry, back to this again. When you say motivating factor... do you mean he wants to be president so that he can do something about it? I'm trying to understand what you mean.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:26 pm
If you substituted the word 'black' for 'white' in TUCC's mission statement, it would read like this:

"We are a congregation which is Unashamedly White and Unapologetically Christian... Our roots in the White religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are a White people and remain "true to our native land," the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. We constantly affirm our trust in God through cultural expression of a White worship service and ministries which address the White community. White ethics must be taught and exemplified in homes, churches, nurseries and schools, wherever Whites are gathered.

Commitment to White Value System
Commitment to White Ethics
Commitment to the White Community
Commitment to White Family
Commitment to the White Work Ethic
Pledge to support White Institutions
Pledge to make acquired skills available to White community
Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who embrace the White value system
Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:27 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:

I don't see a problem that Obama belonged to a black church that was dedicated to helping black people either, nor did I suggest anything wrong with that.


That's what you say here, but according to your subsequent paragraphs it's not true. You imply that because you cannot substitute white for black in the church's mission statement and description of itself, there is a problem. Just as in math, you cannot just make substitutions with unequal values and expect to still come out with an equation that can be solved. By your substitution logic, there can be no Korean churches or synagogues, because if you substituted white for korean, or white for Jew, it would be problematic.

Quote:
I do see a problem with Obama sharing the racist and anti-American views of his pastor presumably with the consent of the congregation if he in fact does. You are the one who asked what TUCC was all about so I provided the information I had.


Not exactly. You seemed to be saying (and still kind of do) that the organization itself is racist or has a primary purpose that is unsavory somehow, and that Obama's membership in such a church tarnishes him by association. That's why I asked what you knew about his church's mission and that's when you shared that paragraph (out of 3 on that page). What I want to know is what you know of the man and the church other than the clips that continue to be played on Fox. Or are you letting your entire opinion be formed around that?

Quote:
Does this make sense?

No, not to me. Why is it that you seem to think that Obama would not have the interests of all of us at heart? What has he said or done to give you this impression?


I think if it doesn't make sense it can only be that you don't want it to Freeduck. I haven't found any clips on Fox--I have found plenty of clips scattered throughout the web however--and I know that Obama says that Jeremiah Wright is much more than those clips. We know the clips are valid because the Church sells CDs of Pastor Wright's sermons. That's how those clips got on the internet in the first place. If he preaches non-controversial sermons, there is nothing stopping Obama supporters from putting those clips out there too.

Remember that Trent Lott spoke probably hundreds of thousands of words as a Senator though, 99.9% of those not racist or un-PC in any sense. At StromThurmond's birthday party, he made a comment about the country being better off if Thurmond's presidential bid had been successful. Thurman was a white separatist at the time of his presidential bid many decades before, however, and Lott was forced to resign as Senate Majority Leader for making a single casual reference in support of a 90 year old colleague. No amount of Lott saying that Thurmond's platform didn't even cross his mind at the time could save him.

We have a whole lot more than one comment from Jeremiah Wright .

Did you do the exercise I suggested substituting the words? Would you please do that and then tell me how you would react to that if that is what was published on a church's website?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:28 pm
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
If you substituted the word 'black' for 'white' in TUCC's mission statement

And if whites had faced hundreds of years of slavery, oppression, segregation and systematic discrimination, that equation might make any sense.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:31 pm
nimh wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
If you substituted the word 'black' for 'white' in TUCC's mission statement

And if whites had faced hundreds of years of slavery, oppression, segregation and systematic discrimination, that equation might make any sense.


And if 92% of Americans (black and white) had a favorable opinion of Jeremiah Wright, Obama wouldn't be in hot water.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:32 pm
Quote:

We have a whole lot more than one comment from Jeremiah Wright .


And because of this, Jeremiah Wright will never have any chance of being elected to any political office.

No one is complaining about this.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:42 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Quote:

We have a whole lot more than one comment from Jeremiah Wright .


And because of this, Jeremiah Wright will never have any chance of being elected to any political office.

No one is complaining about this.


That is true. So the question remains. If a candidate was placed in a church whose pastor was preaching a white supremacist gospel and part of the mission statement of the church was to affirm the virtues and contributions of the white race, would you accept his or her explanation that he didn't share the views of the pastor but that he stayed because it was his church home? Would you believe that he did not give at least tacit approval to the message?

Do you honestly think that the candidate's membership in this church and his close association with the pastor would not be an issue?
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:49 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Remember that Trent Lott spoke probably hundreds of thousands of words as a Senator though, 99.9% of those not racist or un-PC in any sense. At StromThurmond's birthday party, he made a comment about the country being better off if Thurmond's presidential bid had been successful. Thurman was a white separatist at the time of his presidential bid many decades before, however, and Lott was forced to resign as Senate Majority Leader for making a single casual reference in support of a 90 year old colleague. No amount of Lott saying that Thurmond's platform didn't even cross his mind at the time could save him.


You're mixing up the situations again, Foxfyre. The words came out of Trent Lott's mouth. He had to defend his own words. Wright's words did not come out of Obama's mouth yet you demand him to defend himself as if they did. If Strom Thurmond had been made to resign because it was his party where Trent Lott said that, then you would have a valid argument.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:53 pm
What the heck is a black work ethic and how is it different from a white work ethic? Inquiring minds ...
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:55 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
I can honestly appreciate Obama for not abandoning a friend with whom he disagrees. If I abandoned my friends for holding views I don't share, I wouldn't have any friends. But I am not running for President where the views I hold can be expected to influence the kind of leadership I will provide. It is one thing to express a generic "I don't agree wtih all he or she says" and to specifically disavow a specific statement about what I do believe. "To say God d*amn America is wrong. I believe God blesses America and so do I in my prayers....." or something to that effect would have been more reassuring to the skeptics I think.

There is a bit of hypocracy in the above paragraph. You say you would not abandon friends for holding views you don't share. At the same time you disqualify Obama because he is friends with people who have views he does not share and won't abandon them. Another bit of hypocracy is the belief that the short snippets represent all that Rev. Wright is, yet disqualify Obama when he says "I don't agree with all he says" because it wasn't specific enough.

And he has the problem of credibility in those clips I posted yesterday in which he adamently insisted he 'never knew' or 'never heard' about Pastor Wright's more inflammatory remarks and 'would have quit' if he had.

It is obvious from the website--which has been considerably revised since it came under close scrutiny via Obama and some more inflammatory phrases have been removed--this is an activist church that pretty much reflects the views of its longtime pastor.

Obama's website once referred to his religious heritage and Pastor Wright complete with links and photos that have all been expunged from the site in the last few days.

At the same time, I am reading comments from the likes of Dick Morris today that this won't sink Obama. And he is probably right.


I have not disqualified Obama Butrfly. Quite the contrary. I have pointed out the problem of credibility that he has with those who are not blind followers and worshipers of Obama or even those who are giving Obama benefit of the doubt. I think his speech was not specific enough to close that credibility gap with anybody who doesn't just accept anything Obama says as gospel.

BPB said it best. A lot of folks think Obama is a politician as much as anybody else is a politiciian. And that means he is likely to say what he thinks people want to hear while avoiding saying what he doesn't want to have to be held accountable for saying.

Some of us are too jaded to accept that as anything other than what it is, however.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 02:56 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
What's the thing you think he's hiding?


that race is a huge motivating force for him... that he's played and manipulated the race card from day one to make himself palatable to blacks and whites and to mask the fact that he has not more vision or hope than any other in the race... he's done a great job... I don't think that makes him better or worse than any other slimy politician... it just makes him the same...


Just a feeling, or is there something specific that gives you this impression?


I'm going to get back to you on this after I give it some serious thought but my first reply would be that I have a strong bullshit and passive aggressive behavior radar... and I'm a major cynic I admit.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 03:18 pm
Foxfyre wrote:

Did you do the exercise I suggested substituting the words? Would you please do that and then tell me how you would react to that if that is what was published on a church's website?


Did you read what I wrote about the fruitlessness of such substitutions? Here, try substituting 3 for 2 in this one: 1+2 = 3. Doesn't work does it. Your substitution jutsu only works if there truly is no difference between blacks and whites in this country and in our history.

Here let's try your exercise:
Quote:
Korean-American Ministry Resources (KAMR) is an official non-profit ministry that provides resources to the Korean-American Christian community. Our current resources include: the largest listing of Korean-American churches on the web, a directory of pastors and seminarians serving in Korean-American churches, and a ministry opening section where Korean-American churches and non-church Korean-American organizations can seek workers. We are working to expand on these resources.

http://www.kamr.org/about-kamr

Hey, no fair! If you substitute white for Korean it sounds racist! Maybe we could try it with an organization for the homeless or the menu from a Mexican restaurant.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 03:26 pm
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
White ethics must be taught and exemplified in homes, churches, nurseries and schools, wherever Whites are gathered.

Commitment to White Value System
Commitment to White Ethics
Commitment to the White Community
Commitment to White Family
Commitment to the White Work Ethic
Pledge to support White Institutions
Pledge to make acquired skills available to White community
Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who embrace the White value system
Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System


Where did you get this part? It doesn't resemble what's on the website under the "about" link or the "mission statement" link.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 03:26 pm
Freeduck - America or American doesn't appear on TUCC's mission statement page.

If it said African-American work ethic, etc. I doubt so many would be having a problem with this.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 03:28 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:
White ethics must be taught and exemplified in homes, churches, nurseries and schools, wherever Whites are gathered.

Commitment to White Value System
Commitment to White Ethics
Commitment to the White Community
Commitment to White Family
Commitment to the White Work Ethic
Pledge to support White Institutions
Pledge to make acquired skills available to White community
Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who embrace the White value system
Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System


Where did you get this part? It doesn't resemble what's on the website under the "about" link or the "mission statement" link.


The church modified that page (and others) around the time Obama began his campaign. The original page is cached on the internet.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 03:31 pm
As far as I can tell, it doesn't say "work ethic" at all on their mission statement. I searched for it. What are you looking at?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Wed 19 Mar, 2008 03:33 pm
nappyheadedhohoho wrote:


The church modified that page (and others) around the time Obama began his campaign. The original page is cached on the internet.


This is the cached page and it also doesn't say that. Where did you get it?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 643
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 08:24:15