Quote:I think that you should worry about the money. I think that you will see the donations for her drop off quite a bit after Saturday, and then next Tuesday. Too high a percentage of donors are maxed out for it to continue at a high pace.
What really strikes me about what you've written is that this thing just isn't going according to plan for you! You say that Hillary has 'waited for 8 years.' Nobody is guaranteed or owed anything. Hillary will have to fight to win it.
Are you willing to admit that you are afraid she is going to lose?
Btw, Obama is up to 6.5 million by now.
Cycloptichorn
Sellin donuts, like I said.
When Hillary ran for the Senate in NYState, everyone said she couldn't win. She was too polarizing, blah blah blah.
She did win, even though the money she raised for her campaign was very small compared to that of her opponent. She was so successful, in fact that the next time she ran, her Republican opponent could not raise enough money to launch a successful campaign.
It takes more than money to win a campaign.
And yes, I'll admit that I fear that she might not win. There are no guarantees. And who wouldn't be afraid that their candidate wouldn't make it? Are you afraid?
However, I believe she has a better chance of winning than Obama has. Count the delegates. Obama can't win Texas. The reason she won by such a respectable margin in California, despite all the hoopla about the "huge endorsements of the John and Ted Kennedys and the wife of the very popular governor, is because the women and Latinos stuck with her. Look at the statistics. And they will do the same in Texas for the same reasons. Teddy Kennedy carries less weight among Texas Democrats than he does in California and Mass. She even carried the Catholics.
And when they seat the Florida and Michigan delegates Obama can't win. And, in light of this the super delegates will remain true to the commitments they have already made. They would be foolish to do otherwise.
And it's inevitable that the DNC will eventually seat those delegates. If they don't they deserve to lose the election. If those delegates are disenfranchised, there will way more trouble than it's worth. They've been punished enough by not being able to cash in on the early primary that violated the DNC rules. That will be sufficient to deter other states from trying it next time. There is no advantage for any state to violate the rules because they got nothing out of it. Not anything they wanted by moving the date up. So other states will be smart enough to not try it again. It's about revenue. Therefore there is no advantage to denying those delegates a seat at the convention. The decision will be made by a committee of 38 or so members. If they cut off their noses to spite their faces, they'll deserve what they get.
It was foolish of the DNC to think they could regulate by punishment in the first place. If they want to do something about the danger of everyone scheduling an earlier and earlier primary, then we should work for a nation wide primary. It's not fair the way it is anyway. Those of us in Oregon don't have our primary until May 6.
None of the candidates campaigned in Florida. Both Obama and Clinton held a few limited fund raisers, which was allowed. Only Obama bought time for national TV ads in that state. But Hillary won with a very respectable margin. Explain that when you're considered whether she'll make it or not.
If all you can say to me, after I asked for a reasoned consideration of my point of view is to accuse me of being afraid that Hillary will lose.....and your point about that is what, exactly?....... and to to brag and gloat about Obama's fund raising machine, as if that proved anything, then I won't take you any more seriously than you take me. You're only motivating the Hillary supporters by your blind arrogance.
You don't appear to want to have a reasoned debate about the candidates or the issues. You apparently want to simply dismiss me. Good luck.