Obama '08?

He won't be conceding anything, Kicky. Mathematically neither candidate has much of a shot of winning before the convention at this point.

Hell, Edwards hasn't dropped out yet, even!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/29/122157/065/735/442695

Quote:

Because the Obama Campaign has paid staffers in all the 22 stated for February 5th. More importantly, almost a 1/2 of the states are caucus states, which the Obama Campaign have been working for months.

That link is chock full of info on Obama's ground game in various smaller states.

I think that there's a great chance that he will win many of the smaller states while staying at least somewhat competitive in CA. In NY I expect Clinton to win big, same as IL for Obama.

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Jeez I hope I can be considered to dj one of the Hillary inauguration balls... I've already made it known to her headquarters that I'll be available gratis...

0 Replies

You and Bill in the same room? Shocked

Men, hide your wives and daughters...mothers too!

0 Replies

Sorry. I just have to post this. Laughing

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a285/chrisir/mommy.jpg

0 Replies

And the real smart ones are those who voted for Bush, darling! He started an illegal war, killed tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis, created a huge federal deficit, and many thousands of Americans are now losing their homes and jobs.

0 Replies

Yeah, it's all Bush's fault...

Gotta blame someone don't ya? The mirrors are too scary.

0 Replies

... which is why we're reduced to being poor-ass farmers.

At least your dad got to keep his guns though!

Cycloptichorn

0 Replies

Huh?

You want an illegal war. Think back to 1990 when Saddam invaded Kuwait, not just for the oil, but because he'd been insulted by an Kuwati sheik/diplomat, and he didn't like that.

We're still fighting THAT war folks. It never ended. Seems to me a Democrat was president for eight years somewhere in there.

0 Replies

Nah, we don't blame Bush for "everything!" He led us into war, he gave tax cuts to the wealthy that was supposed to create jobs, but instead job creation under Bush was worse than Hoover, the federal deficit just increased all by itself even though he's the one that signs off on the federal budget, etc tec etc

0 Replies

I repeat, he did not lead us into war. He did what was needed and should have been done long before to attempt to end that conflict.

Democrats are retarded about this issue. I don't understand how they can be so blind.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

I repeat, he did not lead us into war. He did what was needed and should have been done long before to attempt to end that conflict.

Democrats are retarded about this issue. I don't understand how they can be so blind.

what conflict. saddam was a brutal dictator... running roughshod over his own people in his own sovereign country... a dick no doubt.... but where was the conflict we needed to get involved in?

0 Replies

Uh, seems to me there were repeated violations of the no fly zone for the eight years of Clinton, that continued into B43.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Huh?

You want an illegal war. Think back to 1990 when Saddam invaded Kuwait, not just for the oil, but because he'd been insulted by an Kuwati sheik/diplomat, and he didn't like that.

We're still fighting THAT war folks. It never ended. Seems to me a Democrat was president for eight years somewhere in there.

yes, that war ended when we kicked his ass back into his own country and then went home. That was a republican.... and a republican who was a hell of a lot smarter and more capable than his idiot offspring.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Uh, seems to me there were repeated violations of the no fly zone for the eight years of Clinton, that continued into B43.

well I guess you'd have to decide if where we are today was worth a few flights into the no fly zone. I guess for someone who has a hard on for firing guns that's enough.

0 Replies

Saddam also maintained at least the illusion of having WMD's. He admitted this in custody - that he was afraid of Iran and miscalulated the U.S. response.

How hard is that to understand?

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Sorry. I just have to post this.

And I have to post this. And guess what? I'm not sorry.

http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/7107/baggagegh8.png

[/URL]

0 Replies

Those don't look like carpet bags.

0 Replies

cjhsa wrote:

Saddam also maintained at least the illusion of having WMD's. He admitted this in custody - that he was afraid of Iran and miscalulated the U.S. response.

How hard is that to understand?

you've got more guns than a sane man should have.... should I send a hit squad up to sasquatch land or wherever the hell it is you live to dispatch you?

0 Replies

eoe wrote:

cjhsa wrote:
Sorry. I just have to post this.

And I have to post this. And guess what? I'm not sorry.
[/URL]

yes, one must have a few years of experience on you in order to accumalate any baggage. :wink:

0 Replies

Bi-Polar Bear wrote:

cjhsa wrote:
Saddam also maintained at least the illusion of having WMD's. He admitted this in custody - that he was afraid of Iran and miscalulated the U.S. response.

How hard is that to understand?

you've got more guns than a sane man should have.... should I send a hit squad up to sasquatch land or wherever the hell it is you live to dispatch you?

Huh?

I've posted the list of what my family currently owns here before, my parents, me, and my son. It wasn't a very long list. In fact many of them are outdated calibers, collectors items. I would like to own many more than I do, but they are expensive.

0 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know