Butrflynet
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 09:55 am
nimh wrote:
Fair is fair - seems like she did more than the equivalent of Obama's community organising work before Bill's presidential years.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 11:46 am
blatham wrote:
Just remembered the other thing I was going to say.

Do any of you watch Chris Matthews?


Matthews on Leno the other night was kind of startling. Nearly fell over himself with his appreciation of Hillary Clinton. Jay had been asking why it was that when you meet her in person she's so warm and charming etc etc etc - but it doesn't come across on camera - v Bill Clinton who's so charming etc on camera but apparently not as appealing in person. Matthews went absolutely mad about how great Hillary is in person, blah blah blah, smart, fun, funny, he saw the "girl Bill fell in love with" etc etc etc. I thought I was gonna roll off the sofa in amazement.

Matthews comparing the Republicans to Shiites/Sunis and Kurds was also a fabulous bit of business.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 12:03 pm
ehBeth wrote:
blatham wrote:
Just remembered the other thing I was going to say.

Do any of you watch Chris Matthews?

Bill Clinton who's so charming etc on camera but apparently not as appealing in person.


Did they really say that? I've always heard that Bill Clinton is quite the charmer with both men and women. Even in a room full of people, he has a way of making you feel as if he's focused only on you.
I know only one person who has actually met him, in a room full of people, and she absolutely confirms this.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 12:06 pm
Yup. Seems they find Bill more of a political machine in person.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 12:32 pm
interesting. Perhaps that is his persona with media folk these days.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 12:33 pm
Quote:
Obama poked fun at John Edwards and Hillary Clinton for their response to the "what is your weakness" question at the MSNBC debate. Obama said that he answered the question as an "ordinary person."

"I thought that they meant 'what's your biggest weakness?!' So I said 'well you know I don't handle paper that well, you know, my desk is a mess, I need somebody to help me file and stuff all the time.'"

"So the other two they say well my biggest weakness is 'I'm just too passionate about helping poor people.' I am just too impatient to bring about change in America.'"

Obama joked, "If I had gone last I would have known what the game was. I could have said 'well you know I like to help old ladies across the street. Sometimes they don't want to be helped. It's terrible.'"


http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/18/politics/fromtheroad/entry3726679.shtml
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 12:34 pm
I hadn't finished reading, one more:

Quote:
Obama ended by calling Clinton's comments "tricks" and said voters will stop listening to politicians because of them. At the end of the event, a man yelled out to Obama that he will be a better president than George Bush. Obama responded, "So would you!"
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 12:42 pm
And another good endorsement, from Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA).

Re: Noah, yeah, I agree that it's a bit hyperbolic for me. I think he makes some good points though, especially in terms of how this claim to experience -- and as O'Bill points out, she's definitely making these claims in terms of "ready on day one," i.e. that the experience she claims is directly related to her ability to be president -- will play in a general election.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 01:01 pm
I heard Michael Chertov saying how Europe was now the platform for Al Qaeda terrorism threatening USA. He mentioned Madrid London and a couple of other outrages and bizarrely Pakistan. Good grasp of geography that guy.

I only mention it because he was full of praise for Bush keeping America safe since 9/11. The inference being of course that something scary might happen if you vote Democrat. Or even something scary will happen between now and November to make sure you dont vote democrat. Am I being unfair?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 01:08 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:
Am I being unfair?


Probably.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 01:10 pm
sozobe wrote:
At the end of the event, a man yelled out to Obama that he will be a better president than George Bush. Obama responded, "So would you!"
Laughing

He got Wisconsin's Doyle endorsement too (so you can stop losing sleep over that Razz )
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 01:10 pm
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 01:38 pm
"Senator Obama was wrong -- frightfully so -- in using Ronald Reagan as an example of voters reaching for change. The breadth of change Ronald Reagan brought was crippling for millions of Americans with the two worst recessions since the Depression, a complete disregard for the rights of American labor, and tax cuts that lined the pockets of the richest Americans at the expense of fiscal sanity and the well-being of the most vulnerable in our society.

"Senator Obama may have been more interested in contrasting Reagan with Bill Clinton, but it shows particularly bad judgment to suggest this is the kind or even the breadth of change Americans want. Instead of lauding Ronald Reagan, Senator Obama would do better to remember that it was presidents like Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt or John F. Kennedy who helped move this country forward."
----------------------------------- John Edwards---------------------------
http://www.johnedwards.com/news/press-releases/20080117-obama-reagan/
0 Replies
 
teenyboone
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 05:26 pm
nimh wrote:
sozobe wrote:
There's this, too:

Quote:
Clinton's claim to superior experience isn't merely dishonest. It's also potentially dangerous should she become the nominee. If Clinton continues to build her campaign on the dubious foundation of government experience, it shouldn't be very difficult for her GOP opponent to pull that edifice down. That's especially true if a certain white-haired senator now serving his 25th year in Congress (four in the House and 21 in the Senate) wins the nomination. McCain could easily make Hillary look like an absolute fraud who is no more truthful about her depth of government experience than she is about why her mother named her "Hillary." Dennis Kucinich has more government experience than Clinton. (He also has a better health-care plan, but we'll save that for another day.) If Clinton doesn't find a new theme soon, she won't just be cutting Obama's throat. She'll also be cutting her own.

Hm. That's a lot of sound and fury. But to check whether Noah is right in this quote you just end up going back to that Wikipedia stuff. And well, she's no John McCain for sure, but I was pretty damn impressed by everything she's done - before becoming First Lady of the USA.

Or wait - actually, what you first have to do to check whether Noah is right would be to fact check the way he includes the word "government" in Hillary's claim. I know that Hillary often speaks of her "35 years of experience" - "fighting for people", for example, or "working for change", or some such pablum. Noah is saying Hillary can easily be shown to be lying when she claims she has "35 years of government experience" - but does she claim that?

I do know that it's become a bit of a standard point to deride Hillary's '35 years of experience' talking point - 'all she ever did was be the wife of the president," and such comments. Like Cyclo saying that he'd "never figured out" what those 35 years of experience amounted to. That, I think, is a bit silly considering all this info. And it was all right there on Wikipedia!


Remember, he's only 45 to her 35 years of experience! So he was 6, when she began her career! Cool Cool :wink:
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 05:43 pm
Quote:


I do know that it's become a bit of a standard point to deride Hillary's '35 years of experience' talking point - 'all she ever did was be the wife of the president," and such comments. Like Cyclo saying that he'd "never figured out" what those 35 years of experience amounted to. That, I think, is a bit silly considering all this info. And it was all right there on Wikipedia!


This is unfair. I've never claimed that she didn't have years of experience working in the gov't, or that she hasn't been active and involved; the question was, what has her work amounted to?

As in, what exactly has she accomplished? What has she done? What leadership? What has changed because of her work?

To the best of my knowledge, she helped in large part to establish SCHIP after the failure of the larger Clinton health-care initiative. But I don't see a long list of accomplishments other then that.

What did those years of experience amount to? What came out of them? It isn't clear, the wikipedia article certainly doesn't make it clear. And yet, her experience is supposed to be her selling point?

If this was true, she should have a list of accomplishments to point to. I don't really see such a list.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 05:57 pm
Andrew Sullivan points this out, from Hillary's website:

Quote:
But no president can do it alone. She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. We're confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents - Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan - demonstrates how she thinks. As expected, Bill Clinton was also included on the aforementioned list.


http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4674

He also points to a statement Bill and Hillary made when Reagan died that praised "the way he personified the indomitable optimism of the American people," but you kind of have to say something nice about a recently deceased former president, so I don't put too much stock in that.

If it's true that Reagan is on her short list (looks like 10) of favorite presidents, though, that would kind of undercut her recent pounces on Obama's statements. I say "if it's true" though because it's from a newspaper endorsement, featured in a press release; could be that the newspaper was wrong.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 05:58 pm
Survey USA has had 8 state-level polls out so far this month measuring how the different Democratic candidates match up against the different Republicans in hypothetical match-ups. They covered Washington state, Oregon, Iowa, Ohio, Missouri, Virginia, Kentucky and Alabama.

It's a good occasion to read today's tealeaves on the Democrats' chances in November; but also to take another look at who seems more electable at state-level: Hillary or Obama? And of course; how's the different Republicans' electability look at the moment?

Read on in the Polls etc thread...
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 06:02 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
As an employer; after 25 or 35 years of related experience I'd be more than satisfied, and would be looking more for signs of burnout.

Well, sure, that is a valid way of responding. Thats what I said really, here:

    If her opponents are annoyed at the implicit claim in that message that she's more experienced than them, they can make the argument that it's not about experience but about judgement [..], or they can point out that 25 years or 35 years of relevant work experience doesnt make much of a substantive difference anymore - which I'm not sure about, myself. But deriding her in terms of, 'anyone yet figured out what those 35 years of experience amounted to?', or accusing her of being an ' absolute fraud' for claiming those 35 years of experience, is just a bit lame.
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Noah might be a bit over the top, but it's not as if Hillary doesn't deserve much of the criticism she gets.

Oh, Hillary deserves lots of criticism. But that doesnt make it OK to level things at her that happen not to be fair. You gotta keep look at each assertion on a case by case basis.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 06:06 pm
Butrflynet wrote:
Since we are being fair, let's not short-sheet Barack Obama on his work prior to the Illinois Legislature. He did a lot more than just community organizing.

Sure, absolutely, of course! And keep on coming with that info whenever someone tries to put the shame stuff of "what did he ever achieve" on Obama.

sozobe wrote:
Quote:
Obama poked fun at John Edwards and Hillary Clinton for their response to the "what is your weakness" question at the MSNBC debate. Obama said that he answered the question as an "ordinary person."

"I thought that they meant 'what's your biggest weakness?!' So I said 'well you know I don't handle paper that well, you know, my desk is a mess, I need somebody to help me file and stuff all the time.'"

"So the other two they say well my biggest weakness is 'I'm just too passionate about helping poor people.' I am just too impatient to bring about change in America.'"

Obama joked, "If I had gone last I would have known what the game was. I could have said 'well you know I like to help old ladies across the street. Sometimes they don't want to be helped. It's terrible.'"


Laughing Laughing

Touche. They deserved that.. that was hilarious Razz
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Fri 18 Jan, 2008 06:24 pm
sozobe wrote:
Re: Noah, yeah, I agree that it's a bit hyperbolic for me.

Yeah.. You asked me a couple of days ago about Andrew Sullivan. I often dont agree with him, but I do generally enjoy reading him. But lately I've stopped. Man, that guy is obsessed. With Hillary I mean. In a bad way. He has that absolutely visceral hatred/disdain/distrust going that you otherwise only find on the rightwing fringes. Dude.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 351
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 11/26/2025 at 11:22:37