ican711nm
 
  -1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:27 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
However hateful you may find their political beliefs, it is not illegal for them to hold them. Mere political opposition in our democracy is not a rationalization for either revolution or even impeachment. Get a life.

ican711nm wrote:
It is obvious that Obama must be impeached and removed from office ASAP. The longer he stays in office the more votes he will buy with tax payer money by buying legal voter votes and/or by merely bribing election officials to buy more dead voter registrations so that Obama voters will vote many times.

The goal of the "charming" Obama-Soros gangsters is the theft of our country from us. They are fomenting a so-called peaceful revolution for conquering America in order to create their own version of a "new world order."

We must find a way to convince Congress to impeach and remove Obama before the Obama-Soros gangsters win their revolution.

Of course there is always available the "Egyptian people's method" of removing a gangster leader from office. Organize the massing of several million American people into the streets around the Whitehouse and Capital to demand that Obama-Soros resign or be removed.

George, I am NOT opposing Barack Obama for what he has said, what he is saying, or even what he will say. I am opposing and seeking the removal of the charming gangster Barack Obama for the illegal actions he HAS continued to perpetrate:
TARP, STIMULUS, FANNIE & FREDDIE, and OBAMACARE.
okie
 
  0  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:36 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
okie wrote:
I think, cyclops, that some leftist organizations probably pay people to demonstrate? For example, you can work for Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and other left wing activist groups.
Wow, you really are new to this.
You don't have to pay people to protest. These groups just ask people to do it. I wouldn't say that all those tea partiers who have come out to various things got paid to do it, would you? You should understand that the guys on the other side feel the same way about their issues.
Cycloptichorn
The silent majority has been busy making a living and producing. If it ever decides to protest in large numbers, then it will be something to see. It will be a big contrast to a few oddball leftists standing on a corner waving signs that they hate Big Oil or something.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:47 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
okie wrote:
I think, cyclops, that some leftist organizations probably pay people to demonstrate? For example, you can work for Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and other left wing activist groups.
Wow, you really are new to this.
You don't have to pay people to protest. These groups just ask people to do it. I wouldn't say that all those tea partiers who have come out to various things got paid to do it, would you? You should understand that the guys on the other side feel the same way about their issues.
Cycloptichorn
The silent majority has been busy making a living and producing.


Oh, and those of us on the other side? We're not busy making a living and producing? Is that what you're saying? You're full of ****. The 'silent majority' works no harder than those on the Left. And if the Tea Party rallies are any indication, many of them are either on disability or medicare or retired, so no. They aren't exactly busy making a living. They're busy in a lot of cases living on the dole.

Quote:
If it ever decides to protest in large numbers, then it will be something to see. It will be a big contrast to a few oddball leftists standing on a corner waving signs that they hate Big Oil or something.


Yeah, I won't hold my breath waiting for that. After all, you guys are all too busy working. Right?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 01:50 pm
@ican711nm,
ican, Get a life! Nothing passes unless congress approves it first. You want to impeach all of congress too?

Get a life; you really don't know what you are talking about..
parados
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 04:37 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I find it funny that he wants to impeach Obama for legislation signed by GWBush, FDR, and Johnson. I'm surprised he doesn't want to impeach him for passing the 14th amendment as well.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 05:29 pm
@parados,
It's still too early; give him time.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 05:44 pm
@plainoldme,
You're just bitter that you can't get on the Democrat's Black Ops payroll.

Too bad, maybe your son would have saved his toes.
okie
 
  0  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 09:10 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn, have you noticed the libs are getting pretty hysterical these days? I think they are realizing their hope and change mantra was a big sham, more and more people are catching on, and the peoples patience is wearing thin.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 09:22 pm
@okie,
What silent majority? You act as if no one but the wing nuts work. Just think of all those kids who rode in their mothers' Buicks after the silver spoons were pulled from their mouths to make room for their braces. Oh, and ignore that some of the left trace their roots to the labor union movement and not the robber barons.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 09:24 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
What is with this bitter stuff? I'm a cheerful person, known for being friendly and polite. Not a right wing cheerleader with plastic body parts.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 09:25 pm
@okie,
The libs are afraid people like you are going to make certain our children and grandchildren die from environmental poisons.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Tue 15 Feb, 2011 09:26 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
You're just bitter that you can't get on the Democrat's Black Ops payroll.


Finn: You guys are more evil.

Dem: No, you guys are way more evil.

Finn/Okie/... : Are not!

Dem: Are too!

...


How many times can this hair be split?
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
Rockhead
 
  1  
Wed 16 Feb, 2011 11:05 am
@JTT,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaB7BQ6PlHs
spendius
 
  0  
Wed 16 Feb, 2011 12:20 pm
@Rockhead,
I presume the OG symbolises the US electorate in this context. Is that right?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 16 Feb, 2011 12:39 pm
@JTT,
When people can't acknowledge truth/facts, they'll continue to split that hair until dooms day.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Wed 16 Feb, 2011 05:05 pm
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2051527/posts
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/pdf/hist.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_U.S._public_debt
ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.cpseea1.txt

1. MFITR = Maximum Federal Income Tax Rates ( in percent)
2. FREC = Federal Receipts (in trillions of dollars)
3. FOUT = Federal Outlays (in trillions of dollars)
4. FDEF = Federal Deficits (in trillions of dollars)
5. FDEB = Federal Debts (in trillions of dollars)
6. TCPOP = Total Civilian Populations (in millions)
7. TCEMP = Total Civil Employments (in millions)
8. PCPEMP = Percent of Civilian Population Employed (in percent)

Years……....MFITR…...FREC…....FOUT…....FDEF…....FDEB…...TCPOP..…TCEMP..…PCPEMP
1980……....70.000…..0.5171…..0.5909…..-0.074…..0.9077…..167.75….. 99.302…..59.200
1988……....33.000…..0.9092…..1.0644…..-0.155…..2.6023…..184.61…..114.97…..62.300
1992……....31.000…..1.0912…..1.3815…..-0.290…..4.0646…..192.81…..118.49…..61.500
2000……....39.600…..2.0252…..1.7890…..+0.236…..5.6742…..212.58…..136.89…..64.400
2003……....35.000…..1.7823…..2.1599…..-0.373…..6.7832…..226.60…..141.03…..63.500
2007……....35.000…..2.5680…..2.7287…..-0.161…..9.0077…..231.87…..146.05…..63.000
2008……....35.000…..2.5240…..2.9826…..-0.459…..10.025…..233.79…..145.36…..62.200
2010……....35.000…..2.1651…..3.7207…..-1.556…..13.562…..237.83…..139.06…..58.500
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Wed 16 Feb, 2011 05:20 pm
@okie,
Getting?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Thu 17 Feb, 2011 07:31 am
@H2O MAN,
PrezBO is on thin ice and a step closer to being run out of town on a rail.

I'm not sure if tar and feathers will be applied though.
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1942
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 08:31:52