@ican711nm,
Let's see why your logic is poor ican..
You claim there are 3 conditions Obama has to meet to be President and list those 3 areas of the constitution where they are contained.
You claim Obama has only met ONE of the 3.
1. Lists the age and birth requirements which you agree Obama has met.
2. Lists the payment for President - You provided no evidence that Obama has violated that one. There is no evidence that he has violated it since his salary was set before he took office and has not changed since he took office.
3. States the oath the President is to recite. You claim he violated it, yet there is video evidence of him reciting that very oath.
You then claim Obama should be impeached and we can only assume for failing to meet the 2 constitutional requirements. Yet, you provided zero evidence of him failing to meet those requirements and we have clear evidence to the contrary
Your logic and lack of observational skills is poor ican because you claim things that clearly are not true to anyone with the barest of observational skills. You then base your impeachment claim on things that aren't even a basis for impeachment let alone have any credible evidence that Obama violated them.