OK this, is the main post, more two posts down:
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1961603#1961603
The main things that stand out for me are
a) Lieberman was 55 points up at the time!! (Good reminder about how fast the worm can turn.) As in, the "endorsement" wasn't particularly meaningful in that context.
b) Lieberman was some sort of mentor to Obama, never quite figured out how that worked, if it was assigned or what.
c) The "endorsement" happened at an event for state Democrats. It wasn't just about Lieberman, at all.
Quote:A few minutes later, however, the audience was riveted as Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, the guest speaker at the $175-a-plate dinner, stood on the podium and began the customary round of recognition of candidates and incumbents in the room. When he got to Mr. Lieberman, who is his mentor in the Senate and who helped recruit him to speak at the event, the applause again was muted.
So, to recap, this wasn't "Obama goes to a Lieberman event and endorses him"; it was "Obama goes to a state Democrat event in 2004 -- a stated goal of his was to help as many Democrats get into office as possible -- and then begins a customary round of recognition of candidates present, of which Lieberman was one."
It sounds, from context, like it would have been horribly rude for him to ignore Lieberman. Not-worth-it rude.