okie
 
  0  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 02:48 pm
@OCCOM BILL,
Would you have been happier if we would now be some third rate banana republic without any economic or military power? As an admirer of Hugo Chavez, perhaps that is what Obama would have preferred?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 02:50 pm
@ican711nm,
parados wrote:

So dummy, does that mean Bush is responsible for 9/11 since he didn't change any of the Clinton policies to stop terrorism? or does this logic only work to blame democrats in your world view?

YES! Bush is responsible for 9/11!

Bush is responsible for 9/11, because he failed to soon enough correct Clinton's defense policies that made it easy for al-Qaeda to steal three jet airliners and use them to murder almost 3,000 people .

Clinton is of course also responsible for not correcting his defense policies that made it easy for al-Qaeda to steal three jet airliners and use them to murder almost 3,000 people .
okie
 
  -3  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 02:52 pm
@ican711nm,
And Clinton could have had Osama Bin Laden from the Sudan. Thats right. Clinton himself said so, and the reason he turned the offer down was because "we had no reason to hold him." Of course, the Democrats on the 9/11 Commission ignored that evidence as not applicable.
parados
 
  3  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 03:07 pm
@ican711nm,
Oh.. so the GOP is still not responsible for the largest tax increase in US history?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  4  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 03:09 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

And Clinton could have had Osama Bin Laden from the Sudan. Thats right. Clinton himself said so, and the reason he turned the offer down was because "we had no reason to hold him." Of course, the Democrats on the 9/11 Commission ignored that evidence as not applicable.

And okie could pull his head out of Hannity's ass and face reality. But why let a complete investigation by the GOP congress change his mind when a lunatic like Hannity can make unfounded claims that are clearly disputed by an investigation of the facts.
Advocate
 
  2  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 03:55 pm
Noted historian Doris Kearns Goodwin supports the job being done by Obama. However, she thinks he should be more like LBJ in his dealings with congress.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/03/doris-kearns-goodwin-want_n_344618.html
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 03:59 pm
@parados,
okie doesn't get anything right; I've yet to see one.
According to Snopes, okie's claim about Clinton is "False."
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/clinton.asp
Advocate
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 04:21 pm
@mysteryman,
It is worse than that. The Reps are the enemies of the country.
Advocate
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 04:23 pm
@Magginkat,
Mark my vote in the affirmative.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 04:28 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

okie wrote:

And Clinton could have had Osama Bin Laden from the Sudan. Thats right. Clinton himself said so, and the reason he turned the offer down was because "we had no reason to hold him." Of course, the Democrats on the 9/11 Commission ignored that evidence as not applicable.

And okie could pull his head out of Hannity's ass and face reality. But why let a complete investigation by the GOP congress change his mind when a lunatic like Hannity can make unfounded claims that are clearly disputed by an investigation of the facts.

Forget your hatred for the reasonable guy like Hannity that has an ounce of common sense, unlike you. We have had this debate about this, and the evidence is overwhelming and certain, some of it from Clinton's quotes of his own admissions. The reason you continue to deny the obvious is because it gores your ox, the holier than thou socialistic and Marxist sympathizing Democratic Party.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  -1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 04:30 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

It is worse than that. The Reps are the enemies of the country.

Good grief, which party advocates flooding the country with illegals and sympathizing with terrorists, dictators, and hoodlums around the world? Hint, it aint the Republicans.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 04:36 pm
Obama is an apostle of Saul Alinski's Community Organizers.

Saul Alinski wanted to replace USA capitalism with USA statism.

Therefore, Obama is trying to replace USA capitalism with USA statism.

Quote:

http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/unabridged?va=statism&x=31&y=9
Main Entry: stat·ism Pronunciation Guide
Variant(s): or state·ism \std.izm, -ti-\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): -s
Etymology: 1state + -ism; translation of French étatisme
: concentration of all economic controls and planning in the hands of a highly centralized government <abandoned her former reliance on statism in favor of private enterprise -- World> -- compare GOVERNMENTALISM 1
okie
 
  -2  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 05:04 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Obama is an apostle of Saul Alinski's Community Organizers.

Saul Alinski wanted to replace USA capitalism with USA statism.

Therefore, Obama is trying to replace USA capitalism with USA statism.


Amazing as it may seem ican, the modern Democratic Party has become the home of Marxist sympathizers and communists. If anyone doubts it, they need to read up on Obama and check out the Communist Party USA and find out who and what they are supporting. CPUSA Election Platform 2004 resembles pretty closely in many ways the Democratic policies carried forward by Obama.

http://www.cpusa.org
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 05:49 pm
@Magginkat,
Then you would be violating the constitution and its definition of treason.
It is the only crime defined in the constitution.

Pleas post examples of how Bush or Cheney committed treason.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 05:50 pm
@kuvasz,
Then perhaps you would care to give us specific examples of HOW he committed treason, along with how those acts violated the treason definition in the Constitution.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 05:58 pm
@cicerone imposter,
There is nothing in that link to snopes that mentions anything about what Okie claimed.

Here is Bill Clinton admitting that he refused to arrest bin Laden and instead begged the Saudi's to take him.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/10/181819.shtml
okie
 
  -2  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 06:33 pm
@mysteryman,
It is part of the record, mm, and they have since tried to spin their way out of it, but there is reasonable suspicion also that these events might also have had something to do with Sandy Berger stealing national security documents before the 9/11 committee proceedings, for which he was never adequately grilled over and punished for. Plainly, the 9/11 Commission dropped the ball, but no surprise given the Democrats on that committee, including Jamie Gorlick, famous for the "Wall," which is also suspected of not preventing 9/11 as we could have if agencies had been sharing intelligence.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 07:40 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
Amazing as it may seem ican, the modern Democratic Party has become the home of Marxist sympathizers and communists.

I don't think that amazing. I think that damn near a sure thing. After all, Obama is an apostle of Saul Olinski Community Organizer, and Alinski acted in almost complete harmony with Marxists and Communists.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 07:54 pm
@ican711nm,
Sean Hannity is a liar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc4l4pBTDm8
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Tue 19 Jan, 2010 09:24 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

okie wrote:
Amazing as it may seem ican, the modern Democratic Party has become the home of Marxist sympathizers and communists.

I don't think that amazing. I think that damn near a sure thing. After all, Obama is an apostle of Saul Olinski Community Organizer, and Alinski acted in almost complete harmony with Marxists and Communists.

Maybe the people are beginning to wake up out of being mesmerized by the Press and Obama, maybe the Massachusetts election is a beginning sign of that happening. I hope so. Perhaps this was not only a vote against Coakley, but a huge vote against the likes of Obama and his Marxist mentors and teachers like Alinsky, Wright, and others. I hope so. I don't know why it took so long, but I hope the trend continues. America is at stake.
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1544
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 04/20/2025 at 05:14:16