@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:
okie wrote:also he opposed the wars because America was an aggressor against the peoples of the Middle East and against Islam,
Hell,
I opposed the war in Iraq because we were the aggressor. Are you saying that makes me a terrorist?
Obviously not. I don't think you read my post very well, either that or you mis-interpreted it. The point of my post is that you need to look at the man's mindset in totality, taken together, in context. You can oppose the war, thats fine, but if you oppose it for various reasons over other reasons, it could mean that you have sympathies for terrorists.
For example, I will take a friend of mine as an example, he opposed the war from the very beginning, because he thought Iraq was a minimal threat to us, and he thought it would be a budgetary drain, also that it could become a quagmire, basically an unwise place and time to become involved. He also opposed it before the resolution was voted by Congress, he was consistent and did not change his opinion after the war began. He is a very patriotic person and an upright person, and he is entitled to his opinion. Obviously he is as far from being a terrorist as can be possible, as hopefully you probably are.
In contrast however, the shooter in Texas not only opposed the wars, but he opposed them for alot of different motivations, and he apparently had sympathies with revolutionary jihadists, and that is a completely different scenario, as we are now beginning to find out more about.