Obama '08?

Quote:

I might add that, the nature of the response you have received here on A2K is likely indicative that others do not find the quality of your argumentation to be particularly impressive either.

getting an meaningful response at all is an indicator of post quality, and Yankee has gotten you multiple times.....stuff THAT in your pipe and smoke it.

You are not interested in debate, nor are you interested in any objective analysis of the days events. You are only interest in the points of view of those who think like you. The fact that you are wrong many times is really not important. Education and life experience will change your opinions.

Folks like cyclops, ci, and Parados will try to gang up and run you out of here. Hang in there, don't let them do it, they are leftie idealogues. Your posts indicate you to be a very reasonable person.

Is this the 'lowest common denominator' theory of posting? One would hope that people would aspire to a higher standard than that - but I can certainly understand why some such as yourself do not.

Quote:

Is this the 'lowest common denominator' theory of posting? One would hope that people would aspire to a higher standard than that - but I can certainly understand why some such as yourself do not.

WTF is wrong with you? Why do you need to ALWAYS be on the personal attack?

Actually I thought I was still on the Conservatism thread when I made the last post, but since I posted it on the Obama thread, I'll take the opportunity to express how little of Modern American Conservative or Classical Liberal concepts are emulated by our current President and majority party. Of course the GOP wasn't doing a hell of a lot better in the middle part of the GWB administration, but perhaps it does illustrate why so many are not happy with what is currently going on and why we will stop it if we can before irreversible damage is done.

I don't even know what you mean when you say that. Are you implying that myself or others have suggested you no longer post on A2K?

Cycloptichorn

You are not interested in debate, nor are you interested in any objective analysis of the days events. You are only interest in the points of view of those who think like you. The fact that you are wrong many times is really not important. Education and life experience will change your opinions.

No son, you said Bush tax cuts are THE reason we are in the current financial mess.

I think the approval ratings for Obama and the Dems in congress are 'so much higher than the last bunch' (assuming that is so....I didn't check)

is probably because Democrats have more slavishly political religious and partisan types among them who will defend 'their guys' no matter what they do and who will condemn any critics no matter what is criticized. But the 'approval' doesn't seem to hold up on a case by case evaluation, so I have to believe it is based more partisan loyalty than on any objective criteria.

No son, you said Bush tax cuts are THE reason we are in the current financial mess.

If the Bush tax cuts had not occurred we would be in much better shape financially in this country.

There are many reason, Bush tax cuts represent one of the many, but not THE reason.

I do not have the desire to explain this to you.

I am currently engaged in the objective analysis of the 7th Race at Belmont Park. This is what I do with my SS Income.

Foxfyre wrote:

I think the approval ratings for Obama and the Dems in congress are 'so much higher than the last bunch' (assuming that is so....I didn't check)

C'mon, we're talking about Bush. You know you don't have to check. He was averaging in the 30's for years, Obama's approval rating is double that.
Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

I think the approval ratings for Obama and the Dems in congress are 'so much higher than the last bunch' (assuming that is so....I didn't check)

C'mon, we're talking about Bush. You know you don't have to check. He was averaging in the 30's for years, Obama's approval rating is double that.
Cycloptichorn

Not exactly accurate, cyclops. Bush's ratings were good until the constant drumming on Bush finally took its toll, well into his presidency. If it was in the 30's 4 years after he was elected, I doubt it, or he would not have been re-elected.