old europe
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 05:59 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

old europe wrote:

Are you suggesting that every German who died during the Third Reich was a Nazi? Are you trying to tell me that every young man who got drafted into the Wehrmacht and sent to fight the Allies was a Jew-hating ideologist? Are you indicating that all those German people who lost family members in Russia, Africa or France due to the megalomaniac plans of a ruthless regime are brainwashed followers of Adolf Hitler, and offending them should not possibly be a concern for any American politician?

You didn't spend two minutes thinking about the implications, did you?

No, in answer to your first questions, no, I do not hold every German responsible, no, I do not, however, and this is important, I have no shame or embarrassment about honoring the dead that died at Normandy to drive back and defeat Germany. Face it, Hitler was a bad guy and the German people just made a big mistake to follow him and fight for his cause. Sorry, but I hope the Germans get over it someday. If any Germans are offended over a president visiting Normandy, they will just have to be offended. I would hope your country has got past that by now.


I'm not offended. And frankly, I don't think most Germans would be offended.

And don't presume you'll have to tell me that "Hitler was a bad guy" or that "the German people just made a big mistake". Given your comments about the Third Reich, the Weimar Republic, the Nazi regime or Hitler here on this forum, I doubt very much that you're exactly an authority on German history of the 1930s and 40s.

I'm just commenting on the idiocy you were spouting earlier, when you were implying that the only people who could possibly be offended would be "Adolf Hitler or Nazis". It merely shows that you don't pause to stop and think for even the briefest moment when you've found something that you think you can pin on Obama.

International relationships, diplomacy, offending citizens of foreign countries - to hell with that. Apparently, after concerns about diplomatic blunders, breaking of protocol and offending foreign citizens were the most important thing in the world, and after you've been on the frontline of those rightwingers who were loudly condemning Obama for that, none of that is important any more just a couple of days later.


I hope you realize that you're making a caricature out of yourself. If you were voicing somewhat reasonable concerns, people could at least try to take you serious. But these desperate attempts to find just something, anything, that you can pin on Obama, and then proceeding with hysterical cries about impeachment, all of that makes you look extremely silly.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 06:11 pm
@revel,
It was something about time constraint wasn't it?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 06:14 pm
@old europe,
oe wrote:
Quote:
I hope you realize that you're making a caricature out of yourself. If you were voicing somewhat reasonable concerns, people could at least try to take you serious. But these desperate attempts to find just something, anything, that you can pin on Obama, and then proceeding with hysterical cries about impeachment, all of that makes you look extremely silly.


okie is famous for making things up and making mountains out of mole hills.
His concerns that he blows up as if it's a national tragedy when nobody else cares is idiotic at best. Unfortunately, okie never learns.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 06:49 pm
@old europe,
old europe wrote:
International relationships, diplomacy, offending citizens of foreign countries - to hell with that. Apparently, after concerns about diplomatic blunders, breaking of protocol and offending foreign citizens were the most important thing in the world, and after you've been on the frontline of those rightwingers who were loudly condemning Obama for that, none of that is important any more just a couple of days later.

I cannot believe the idiocy of what you are posting here. Let us review. I expressed concern about Obama giving the bust of Winston Churchill back to Great Britain, and kind of treating Brown a bit second rate. I also expressed concern about breaking protocol with the queen, but I qualified that concern by saying I wasn't all that worked up over it, if it was okay with the queen, fine with me. Frankly, I believe the return of the Churchill bust was over the top. But to equate that with not visiting Normandy, so that no offense be given, I find your comparison pretty bizarre, oe.

Quote:
I hope you realize that you're making a caricature out of yourself. If you were voicing somewhat reasonable concerns, people could at least try to take you serious. But these desperate attempts to find just something, anything, that you can pin on Obama, and then proceeding with hysterical cries about impeachment, all of that makes you look extremely silly.

I think it is you that is making a caricature, and it is Obama that is providing insults almost daily. I will bring up another one, Obama goes to Turkey and declares that now we are not at war with Islam. Now, that is an implication that somehow we were, which is absolute rubbish and nonsense. Obama is losing more and more respect of any I had for the man, and its almost down to nothing, oe. This man dumps on things and people of decency and then bows to those that don't have it. And I am tired of his offhand dumps on Bush every chance he gets. I am sick of the sleeze of this man.

Again, if anyone in Germany would take offense at a president visiting Normandy, this being 2009, I feel very sorry for them, and I think Obama is a total dud to even consider it. Obama would not qualify to occupy the same room as a Winston Churchill.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 07:58 pm
@okie,
That's where you make all your errors; just because it's okay with the queen it's okay with you? Who the hell are you, and who the f... cares?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 08:09 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
I cannot believe the idiocy of what you are posting here. Let us review.


Okay, let's.

I went back to check some of your posts where you were criticising Obama for offending foreign leaders or citizens:

okie wrote:
Obama and wife, Michelle, among other gaffes, broke established protocol with the queen, in regard to body contact.


okie wrote:
Heck, our troops are told in Iraq not to do certain things, like do not show the bottom of your shoe to an Iraqi, that is very disrespectful. Also do not talk to them close with sunglasses on, or do not step back while talking, that is disrespectful. DO NOT TOUCH their women, that is most important. These are just a few pointers among many, and the troops are instructed on these things, so that we do not offend.

Can't the president and First Lady at least offer the same courtesy for anywhere they happen to be, or are they just too self important and arrogant?


okie wrote:
But of course the liberal press treats Obama as if he is too holier than thou to offend anyone, after all, whats the big deal about the old fuddy duddy queen? That is the attitude nowadays.


okie wrote:
I tend to think alot of this is intentional, after all, what serious president that had a first clue about history would return a bust of Winston Churchill to England, after having been presented to a previous president for the White House? I think that is not only very insulting, but extremely arrogant.


okie wrote:
I don't care to see Obama and wife offend anyone of our friends for no good reason.


Summary: Obama is too self important and arrogant to offer some basic courtesy to the people of other countries. He violated diplomatic protocol. He's disrespectful and offensive, and the media doesn't even call him out on that. His lack of knowledge about historical events concerning World War II leads to serious diplomatic mistakes. These kinds of symbolic gestures connected with World War II history are not only very insulting, but extremely arrogant. Obama shouldn't offend any of America's friends.


Contrast that with your more recent posts:

okie wrote:
Obama declined to visit Normandy, because, now get this, HE DID NOT WISH TO OFFEND GERMANY!! Is this man really our president? I have to pinch myself, is this really happening. Bizarre to say the least, and most reasonable people would be looking for a way to impeach him as soon as possible to avoid the worst.


okie wrote:
Sorry, but I hope the Germans get over it someday. If any Germans are offended over a president visiting Normandy, they will just have to be offended. I would hope your country has got past that by now.


okie wrote:
I don't particularly care if Obama offends Adolf Hitler or Nazis, most of which are dead and gone by now, or Germans that still have warm feelings about them


okie wrote:
Again, if anyone in Germany would take offense at a president visiting Normandy, this being 2009, I feel very sorry for them, and I think Obama is a total dud to even consider it.


Summary: It's ridiculous that Obama would even consider not to offend another country. It's highly questionable that such a man can be President. He should probably be impeached. Offending other countries is sometimes simply necessary. After all, we're merely talking about historical events concerning World War II. People have to get over that already. And at any rate, if anyone could possibly be offended, he would either have to be Adolf Hitler, a Nazi or a Nazi sympathizer. Given that this is the year 2009, anybody who would be offended about symbolic gestures connected with World War II history is only to be pitied.
dyslexia
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 08:21 pm
@old europe,
OE I notice you make the same error whether responding to Okie or Foxfyre, yoy read what they post rather than what they; it's a common error.
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 08:30 pm
@old europe,
Tell me. Is it considered bad taste by Germans for an American to visit Normandy to pay respect to the American dead there? Is that considered a breach of etiquette in Germany? If so, why?

okie
 
  0  
Sat 11 Apr, 2009 11:56 pm
@old europe,
oe, let me get this straight, you are comparing visiting Normandy to returning a bust of Winston Churchill to England? I just want to clarify that now. I repeat, you are comparing visiting Normandy to returning a bust of Churchill to Great Britain after it had been given as a gift to George Bush by Tony Blair?

Are you sane?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 12:17 am
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

Tell me. Is it considered bad taste by Germans for an American to visit Normandy to pay respect to the American dead there? Is that considered a breach of etiquette in Germany? If so, why?


Apparently it must be, if I am understanding oe correctly, and Obama correctly. This has come out of left field, Foxfyre, I could hardly believe it. This has to be one of the most bizarre things I have ever heard in a good long time. The most disturbing thing about this is what it tells us about Barack Obama. In fairness, look for Obama to do damage control if this gets out of hand, and perhaps he will visit Normandy later. However, it seems clear that Sarkozy wanted to do the visit now and it was entirely possible and scheduled but Obama bowed out for the reasons already stated, and I tend to believe that based upon everything else Obama has done and said.

Another aspect to this, supposedly Bush was universally hated, which was of course not true, and the universal love portrayed for Obama is also not the truth. The relationship between Sarkozy of France and Obama may be in reverse as of now.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/5096803/Barack-Obama-rejects-Normandy-trip-to-avoid-offending-Germany.html
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2009/04/08/obama-skips-visit-to-normandy-american-cemetery/
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 12:19 am
@dyslexia,
dyslexia wrote:

OE I notice you make the same error whether responding to Okie or Foxfyre, yoy read what they post rather than what they; it's a common error.

What did you say? Or what did yoy say? Who is yoy?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 07:07 am
Quote:
I think it is you that is making a caricature, and it is Obama that is providing insults almost daily. I will bring up another one, Obama goes to Turkey and declares that now we are not at war with Islam.


Obama assuring the Muslims of our not being in war with them is not saying that we were. A lot of Muslims have been thinking we are with Islam because of our going into Muslim countries and invading them and perhaps other certain language which put the whole religion of Islam in a negative light. He was merely assuring them that we are not. Read the context of his statement, no where was there an implication of our being at war with Islam in the past.

ANKARA, Turkey - Barack Obama, making his first visit to a Muslim nation as president, declared Monday the United States "is not and will never be at war with Islam."

Calling for a greater partnership with the Islamic world in an address to the Turkish parliament, Obama called the country an important U.S. ally in many areas, including the fight against terrorism. He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and Muslims, portraying terrorist groups such as al Qaida as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Muslims.

Quote:
"Let me say this as clearly as I can," Obama said. "The United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical ... in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all faiths reject."

The U.S. president is trying to mend fences with a Muslim world that felt it had been blamed by America for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.


source

Moreover, there has been quite a few things that I have taken issue with the Obama administration concerning detainees and all the issues surrounding that. However, I see no need to invent things out wild conjecture on your part.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 12:59 pm
@revel,
okie is famous for "wild conjectures." He barks like a dog with nothing to base it on except his wild imagination.
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:18 pm
I suspect that President Obama nodded when the Navy asked for permission to do whatever was necessary to get back the ship captain bobbing around in the lifeboat. Congrats to the Navy. Well done.
okie
 
  0  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 04:36 pm
@realjohnboy,
realjohnboy wrote:

I suspect that President Obama nodded when the Navy asked for permission to do whatever was necessary to get back the ship captain bobbing around in the lifeboat. Congrats to the Navy. Well done.

Agreed, and let me take this opportunity to credit Obama with giving permission to use force to rescue the captain. Good for Obama on this one. Lets hope he means it when he says we need to do more to prevent future piracies.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 07:19 pm
revel wrote:
A lot of Muslims have been thinking we are (at war) with Islam because of our going into Muslim countries and invading them and perhaps other certain language which put the whole religion of Islam in a negative light.


What is that other certain language?

Quote:
Today, I'd like to speak directly to the people across the broader Middle East: My country desires peace. Extremists in your midst spread propaganda claiming that the West is engaged in a war against Islam. This propaganda is false, and its purpose is to confuse you and justify acts of terror. We respect Islam, but we will protect our people from those who pervert Islam to sow death and destruction. Our goal is to help you build a more tolerant and hopeful society that honors people of all faiths and promote the peace.


President Bush’s Address to the UN General Assembly - September 19, 2006

Additional excerpts from President Bush's address

Quote:
To the people of Afghanistan: Together, we overthrew the Taliban regime that brought misery into your lives and harbored terrorists who brought death to the citizens of many nations. Since then, we have watched you choose your leaders in free elections and build a democratic government. You can be proud of these achievements. We respect your courage, and your determination to live in peace and freedom. We will continue to stand with you to defend your democratic gains.


Quote:
To the people of Iran: The United States respects you; we respect your country. We admire your rich history, your vibrant culture, and your many contributions to civilization.


Quote:
To the people of Syria: Your land is home to a great people with a proud tradition of learning and commerce.


Quote:
“Well first of all, I believe in an Almighty God, and I believe that all the world whether they be Muslim, Christian, or any other religion, prays to the same God. That’s what I believe that Islam is a great religion that preaches peace.”


George W Bush - October 7, 2007

Quote:
"Some of the comments that have been uttered about Islam do not reflect the sentiments of my government or the sentiments of most Americans. Islam, as practiced by the vast majority of people, is a peaceful religion, a religion that respects others. Ours is a country based upon tolerance and we welcome people of all faiths in America."

President George W. Bush - November 13, 2002

Quote:
"Islam is a vibrant faith. Millions of our fellow citizens are Muslim. We respect the faith. We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy doesn't follow the great traditions of Islam. They've hijacked a great religion."


George W. Bush - October 11, 2002

This was the leader of the US for the eight years from 1/01 to 1/09. I'm not sure why Muslims needed to hear our current President say essentially the same thing to be convinced that the US is not at war with Islam.

If actions speak louder than words and the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq was what told Muslims America is at war with Islam, what did President Obama's decision to send 17,000 more fighting troops to Afghanistan tell Muslims? What did his efforts to convince NATO countries to send more fighting troops to Afghanistan tell Muslims?

Quote:
"The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam. In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical, not just in rolling back the violent ideologies that people of all faiths reject, but also to strengthen opportunity for all its people."


President Barrack Obama - April 6, 2009

Barrack Obama is correct, just as George Bush was before him, but you'll notice that President Obama's statement did not read

Quote:
The United States is not, has not and will never be at war with Islam.


I suppose it is politics as usual for an elected official to blame his predecessor for all of the problems he has "inherited," but I would like to think any president would pass on the opportunity to take even a subtle shot at his predecessor when addressing our foreign policy; on foreign soil, but if he should find it impossible to resist taking the shot, at least it should be have some slight connection to the truth.

Obama's message during his overseas travel (sometimes implicit; sometime explicit) is that he is very different from his predecessor, George Bush. The assumption inherent in this message is that people in the rest of the world (and particularly Europeans) will find this to be a good thing. It is an accurate assumption.

I have several significant problems with this tactic:

1) In some instances it is simply not true (see above).

2) Obama, intentionally or otherwise, often has difficulty separating his criticism of George Bush from criticism of pre-Obama America and pre-Obama Americans. The United States was not, before Barrack Obama was elected, a belligerent rogue state, nor were its people a population of greedy imperialists bent on material gains no matter what the cost to the rest of the world and the planet itself.

3) It denotes a lack of character and class, and belies Obama's claims to transcending partisan politics.

The serving president of the US should not be taking shots at his predecessors, and past presidents should not take shots at those that follow them (Yes, that means you Jimmy Carter). If for some reason there is a perceived political need to blame the preceding administration, or draw stark distinction between current and past president, there is no end to the number of appropriate surrogates a president can use. Taking the job on personally, demeans the office.

If "a lot of Muslims" believe the US is at war with Islam, then a lot of Muslims are wrong, and are basing their belief on propaganda rather than fact. A lot of Americans believe Islam is at war with the West (and in particular the US), and they are wrong as well. Do we need the Muslim version of Barrack Obama to stand before a crowd in Kansas City and assure us it is not the case?

It never ceases to amaze me how tolerant some people are of foreign ignorance while, at the same time, being so intolerant of American ignorance.

Do these people somehow believe that we have to be more tolerant and accepting of foreign ignorance because the poor WOGs can't help themselves?

Perhaps they fall back on the old canard that perception is reality, and irrespective of whether a people's perception is accurate or even rational we must deal with it as though it were true? Particularly if we can blame our political rivals for creating it and score some points for ourselves.

Finally if anyone believes that Barrack Obama's speech made a significant and lasting impact on how Muslims view America, they are fooling themselves.

The Muslims who believe that America is at war with their religion will continue to believe so as long as we have troops in Afghanistan, send unmanned attack drones into Pakistani territories, and express our support for Israel in any form.

Obama may be seen as the Expected One by his legions of giddy admirers in the West, but a well turned speech and an Arabic middle name is not going to work any magic on the Muslim Street when the next perceived outrage is perpetrated on Muslims by Americans.
okie
 
  0  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 07:46 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn, thanks for all the quotes, it supports what we know, that Obama by his implications continues to dump on Bush and on his own country, by misrepresenting history, in an effort to further his own power. We will just have to see how long he can play that game until it finally catches up to him.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 12 Apr, 2009 08:08 pm
@okie,
Quote:
Finn, thanks for all the quotes, it supports what we know, that Obama by his implications continues to dump on Bush and on his own country, by misrepresenting history, in an effort to further his own power. We will just have to see how long he can play that game until it finally catches up to him.


excellent point...Obama learned long ago the being self depreciating, even lying about ones self to do it, is well accepted in our society. Playing that game has gotten him far. However, when he puts down america he is putting 250 million other people down.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Mon 13 Apr, 2009 08:48 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

realjohnboy wrote:

I suspect that President Obama nodded when the Navy asked for permission to do whatever was necessary to get back the ship captain bobbing around in the lifeboat. Congrats to the Navy. Well done.

Agreed, and let me take this opportunity to credit Obama with giving permission to use force to rescue the captain. Good for Obama on this one. Lets hope he means it when he says we need to do more to prevent future piracies.


I want to backtrack here, no compliments due Obama, as he is only going to increase the numbers and viciousness of pirates now. What was the man thinking anyway? He should have learned that lesson Bush learned with terrorists! And liberals have warned us that killing only breeds more killing. What was Obama thinking? I thought he knew this?

"Pirates Vow Revenge After U.S. Navy Rescues Captain

MOGADISHU, Somalia " Somali pirates on Monday vowed to retaliate for the deaths of three colleagues who were shot dead by U.S. Navy snipers hours before in a daring nighttime assault that freed a 53-year-old American captain."

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 13 Apr, 2009 09:03 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
No, Bush's speech about the Middle East came too late and too little. What most people remember is "if you're not with us, you're against us." He then attacked Iraq without any provocation except his imagination about WMDs and Saddam's connection with the Taliban. Most people in the Middle East saw the US as occupiers of a Middle East country, and that message was the straw that broke the back of US credibility.

Bush's talking points and actions spoke louder than what he said after all that.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1218
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.24 seconds on 06/28/2025 at 06:43:30