okie wrote:Cycloptichorn wrote:okie wrote:Cycloptichorn wrote:
You don't seem to understand who the Commander is; it is the president, not the armed forces. The armed forces serve the decisions of the commander in chief, not the other way around.
Cycloptichorn
That is true, cyclops, but just a couple of big problems with that. First, Obama has finally said he would listen to the commanders to help him make the right decision, and secondly, a CIC should want to win the war in Iraq, right, and to do that he should listen to the experts, and hopefully take at least some of their advice. Also, I am not aware that he even talked with them or considered their opinions before his 16 month proclamation. I don't mind a CIC to make decisions, great, but if he doesn't even listen to his commanders, then he is not doing his job. And he is totally irresponsible. We are not only paying the president, we are also paying the armed forces for all the expertise there. I do not want a president that shoots off his mouth about something he knows nothing about, and that is what has happened here.
here's your problem
Quote:, and secondly, a CIC should want to win the war in Iraq,
You are so caught up in bullshit Republican memes, you can't even consider another path of action. I really don't care what your opinion is of what the CiC should 'want.' It's immaterial.
If you are against presidental candidates talking about things they don't understand, are you interested in some interesting quotes of John McCain doing this, Okie? For that might change your mind about your vote, if you are truly interested in such things as a criteria.
Cycloptichorn
So your fall back position is well, McCain doesn't know anything about some things, so if Obama doesn't, it doesn't matter? One problem with that is the Iraq situation has been front and center for how many years now, and Obama's stances on Iraq have been probably the one issue that has propelled him to where he is, but now you apparently admit it doesn't matter if he knows anything about it before coming out with his solutions, but now it turns out his solutions were never practical, as his detractors have been pointing out that obvious fact how long now, cyclops?
I disagree with every premise you have in this paragraph -
Obama's position has been rock-solid on Iraq for his whole campaign. Can't say the same for McCain.
I never admitted he 'doesn't know anything about it,' I think he knows a great deal about it, certainly more then McCain does, and the proof is that the Iraqi gov't is agreeing with his withdrawal ideas.
His solution - to withdraw - is not only practical, it's the right move to do.
His detractors are scared for the most part, as they watch their carefully constructed reality crumble around them. All you bums on the Right were going on about how great Bush was and how those who were against the Iraq war were wrong, and how we would find WMD and catch OBL; and you were
completely wrong. The Republican argument for the Iraq war is so hollow, and was so incorrect on so many levels, it's phucking pathetic. Now a strong Liberal has come along, our side is beating your side pretty much across the board, and you're searching around for whatever scraps you can find to defend your argument. It is
not compelling in the slightest, and that's why the Dems are ascendant at the moment and the Republican brand is trash.
Cycloptichorn