Chumly wrote:Momma Angel wrote:Chumly,
Why is it that so many will believe the parts in the Bible where it appears God is the bad guy but when told of the parts in the Bible where it shows Him loving, etc., those are not accepted?
Curious that.
Let's rephrase and see if it had the same relative merit:
Why is it that so many will believe the parts in the Bible where it appears God is the good guy but when told of the parts in the Bible where it shows Him doing harm, etc., those are not accepted?
Curious that.
Note the term "relative merit" as I am not arguing any real merit in either case.
Mornin', Chumly. The entire bible was inspired by God. So all the things you read about the destruction of the Canaanites and the plagues on Egypt are true - and have relevance.
The question was why does God permit these things?
Real life says that his god does not permit suffering; we must choose it.
Joe and Pauli say that the existence of suffering proves God does not exist.
You apparently say that if there is a God, he must be impotent.
MA says God can do whatever he wants but doesn't say why we still suffer.
Snood hasn't really answered yet.
If I missed anyone, I'm sorry.