@Chumly,
Quote:God does not "permit suffering" it's a test of faith.
I know I'm going to regret asking this, but what the HELL does that even mean? There are so many things wrong with this tiny sentence, I don't even know where to begin.
For one thing, you start by saying God doesn't permit suffering, and finish by saying that God permits suffering as a "test of faith", all without drawing an intervening breath.
And why exactly would an omniscient God need to "test" us to see if we have faith? He/she should already know who has faith, who doesn't, and to what extent, without having to put his "beloved" creatures through needless suffering.
And then there's the whole matter of "faith" itself. Why is it that this God is so obsessed with it? Where exactly is the great inherent virtue in believing things without any evidence, or even in the face of evidence to the contrary. I would think a truly enlightened God would be more respectful of beings who believe things based on honest analysis of the facts. And besides that, how can you force yourself to believe something you don't believe? If I told you that you HAVE to believe that there are little pink unicorns in your basement, I venture you couldn't believe it no matter how hard or how long you tried. Because it's just silly.
And why does this God need that we believe in him in the first place. Is this all powerful, self sufficient being so insecure that he needs the praise and belief of vastly inferior beings? If he truly exists, his existence should be self evident. I don't have to go around screaming at people, "I EXIST! I EXIST, DAMMIT! WHY THE HELL DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN ME?" Maybe the reason some people don't believe in God is because he does such a perfect impression of a non-existent being.