1
   

The March of the Mormons

 
 
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 02:15 am
Quote:
The march of the Mormons

The Latter-day Saints are on the rise in the US, and a Republican named Mitt Romney has hopes of becoming the first Mormon president. But the church has one serious image problem: polygamy. Which is why HBO's new drama, about a man with three wives, is stirring up controversy. By Julian Borger


Monday February 27, 2006
The Guardian


There is a quirky new drama coming to American television next month. It is called Big Love, and HBO will air it in a plum weekly slot, just after The Sopranos. Like The Sopranos, Big Love is a tale of marital strife in a dysfunctional family, only in this case the central character is not a Mafioso but a regular guy from Utah who happens to have three wives - hence the wry title.


It is another tale of American subculture. As with the Mob in New Jersey, polygamy in rural Utah may be illegal, but is nevertheless a widely accepted part of the landscape. Big Love is being heavily promoted and boasts big-screen stars.
Tom Hanks is one of the producers, Bill Paxton plays the Viagra-popping husband, with Chloe Sevigny, Jeanne Tripplehorn and Ginnifer Goodwin as his three wives. Harry Dean Stanton is cast in the role of the community's sinister polygamist-in-chief.

Most importantly for the audience figures, in a television-watching society somewhat jaded by manufactured edginess, the show has succeeded in generating some genuine political controversy. It so happens that this is a particularly sensitive moment in American politics to be making a noise about polygamous marriage.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Mormons, introduced polygamy to the US before the civil war, but it has spent more than a century trying to disown its continued practice by more than 20,000 renegade Mormon fundamentalists in the backwaters of the western states, as well as in Mexico and Canada.

Polygamy is a constant embarrassment to the church in its quest for mainstream acceptance and top-level political influence.

The church elders, who call themselves the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, have insisted that every episode of HBO's Big Love begin with a disclaimer stating that the Latter-day Saints church does not sanction plural marriage. (The producers insist they intended to put out such a disclaimer anyway, saying the Mormon church's opposition was integral to the narrative, raising its "dramatic stakes".)

The truth is that the Mormon church has managed to live down the Osmonds, but it is still struggling to live down polygamy 116 years after banning the practice. Polygamy survives like a batty old aunt in the attic, sounding off at the most embarrassing moments.

All this is not entirely the church's fault. The fundamentalist sects in Utah and beyond who still use the Mormon label generate a disproportionate number of news stories, mostly about horribly abused women and children. Yet some critics say the church leadership, in its multi-spired temple in downtown Salt Lake City, must shoulder some of the blame. It has sent mixed signals on plural marriages, turned a blind eye to polygamists in its own ranks decades after the ban, and done little to help victims of abuse. Although the church's 1890 "manifesto" against polygamy prohibits it here on earth, the scriptures retain it as a celestial ideal for believers who find their way to the kingdom of heaven.

Such criticisms have long been an irritant to the Mormon hierarchy, but of late they have become excruciating. Now more than ever, the Mormon apostles do not want dirty old laundry to be aired on prime-time television, just as the Latter-day Saints seem poised to fulfil their founder's prophecy and scale the supreme heights of US government.

A Mormon from Nevada, Harry Reid, is currently the most powerful Democrat in Congress and could take command of the Senate if the Democrats do well in congressional elections this November. Meanwhile, another Mormon, Mitt Romney, is likely to declare a run for the presidency.

Romney, the Republican governor of Massachusetts, is a direct descendant of one of the Mormon church's original pilgrims. He joined the Mormon priesthood at 12, and became a church elder at 18, before serving as a missionary in France. In December, he announced that he would not seek re-election for the governorship, and he is now making all the manoeuvres and noises that typically presage the declaration of a candidacy for the White House.

Romney will be a serious contender in 2008. He has a record as a successful businessman and administrator, transforming first the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City and then the high-spending liberal state of Massachusetts from financial basket cases to success stories.

He has shown the breadth of his appeal by winning the governorship in deeply Democratic Massachusetts - "a bit like being a cattle rancher at a vegetarian convention", as Romney puts it. And at 58, Romney has the advantage of relative youth over the Republican front-runner, Senator John McCain, who is 11 years his senior.

No matter how Romney performs in 2008, his candidacy will do two things - it will turn him into a national figure, and it will pose the question: is America ready to put a Mormon in the White House?

Hardly anyone batted an eyelid when Harry Reid emerged as the Senate minority leader in 2004. In fact the Democrats, convinced they had lost that year's elections on "moral values", were proud of Reid's Mormon credentials.

The church is a byword for conservatism (95% of American Mormons voted for Bush in 2004) and Reid is anti-abortion, opposed to gay marriage and gun control and defends capital punishment.

But he is liberal on bread-and-butter issues such as health and education, and that is good enough for the Democrats in this time of exile. Reid at least offers potential crossover appeal in conservative "red" states.

To be continued (source noted below)
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,030 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 02:16 am
Part 2
Quote:
Reid's Mormonism is unthreatening. America does not fear excessive religious zeal in its Democrats, as it tends not to worry about weakness on security from its Republicans. It would be counterintuitive. In any case, the job of Senate minority leader is a backroom task for a political engineer. It does not hold sway over the Union.

But a Mormon running as a Republican for the presidency is another matter. Americans want their presidents not just to represent them, but also to embody them somehow as a nation.

Would a Mormon be permitted to do that?

The precedents are not favourable. Joseph Smith, the founding prophet of the Latter-day Saints church, declared his presidential candidacy in 1844, at a time when his followers were a community of outcasts in Illinois. In July that year, he was shot dead by an anti-Mormon at the age of 38, before his campaign even got going. His successor, Brigham Young, fled west to Utah with the remaining Saints (including Miles Park Romney, Mitt Romney's great-great-grandfather).

They took with them Smith's prophecy that one day a Mormon would come to America's rescue.

Mormons would be "the staff upon which the nation shall lean", the prophet predicted, when the constitution "is on the brink of ruin". The next man to try to fulfil that prophecy was Mitt Romney's father, George, an automobile executive and a three-term Republican governor of Michigan who was born in a polygamous Mormon community in Mexico. He launched an ill-fated presidential campaign in 1967, but proved too gaffe-prone even to last until the official starting post, the New Hampshire primary.

In 2000, it was the turn of Orrin Hatch, a softly spoken Republican senator from Utah, but his campaign was quickly crushed under the Bush steamroller. Before Hatch's effort collapsed, a survey found that 17% of Americans would not vote for a Mormon president under any circumstances.

"One reason I ran was to knock down the prejudicial wall that exists," Hatch later told the Weekly Standard. "I wanted to make it easier for the next candidate of my faith."

That candidate is Romney, who insists that the diehard opposition to Mormonism accounts for only a few per cent of the electorate. That may be optimistic on his part. Elections, especially presidential elections, act like a giant magnifying glass on a candidate's weak points, and Romney's chief weakness will be Mormon history and dogma.

The press will want to know, for example, whether he wears the Mormon's secret and sacred undergarments beneath his politician's suit. There will be a fresh look at why the Latterday Saints' priesthood was closed to black people until 1978, and whether its principal text, the Book of Mormon, is inherently racist. Evangelical conservatives, the backbone of the Republican party, will quiz him on his faith.

Many deny that it is Christian at all. "The challenge to governor Romney would be the most serious in the Republican primaries," said John Green, an expert at the Pew Forum on Religion and Politics. "Many of the evangelicals take a dim view of the Latter-day Saints. The Southern Baptists regularly label the Mormons as a dangerous cult. So you could imagine his opponents might bring this up."

Although Christ is a central figure in Mormon beliefs, the church teaches that God has a material body, and was fathered by another God. Joseph Smith also said that man can ultimately ascend to heaven and become "what God is": divine. Yet despite - or perhaps because of - these fundamental differences from established Christian dogma, the church is a powerful and growing force. It claims 12 million adherents around the world, two-thirds of them in the US, where it is one of the fastest-growing religions.

That's a lot of potential campaign volunteers. The Church of Christ of Latter-day Saints is, after all, the only truly American mass religion. It places the Garden of Eden in Jackson County, Missouri, and claims Christ visited America after the resurrection to promise his second coming, also in Missouri. It is an entirely home-grown faith. Joseph Smith founded the religion in 1830 in upstate New York, telling his followers an angel had appeared to him and handed him the Book of Mormon in the form of gold tablets.

Smith gave the tablets back after translating them from the original "reformed Egyptian". According to the Book of Mormon, Israelites came to the American continent 600 years before Christ, but split into two feuding tribes, Nephites and Lamanites. The Nephites were "pure" (the word was "white" in Mormon scriptures until 1981) and led by a great man called Mormon. Lamanites were idol-worshipping and wicked, and therefore suffered the "curse of blackness" that turned their skins dark. The Lamanites eventually wiped out the Nephites, which is why Christopher Columbus found only brown-skinned native Americans when he arrived. All these Mormon tenets will come under unprecedented scrutiny in a presidential race, which will be an uncomfortable time for the apostles in Salt Lake City.

The difference between a cult and a religion may only be a couple of thousand years, but while the origins of mainstream Christian faiths have acquired the blurred patina of age, the Mormon scriptures are jarringly recent and, in many cases, patently wrong. DNA testing, for example, has shown that the first Americans arrived from Asia, not from the Middle East.

But no Mormon doctrine or practice has proved more troubling to the church than polygamy. The principle did not form part of Smith's original scriptures, but came to him as a revelation years later. He is said to have taken a second wife, a 16-year-old housemaid, in 1833 - and 30 more wives over the next decade, to the disgust of some of his disciples.

The legacy endured for nearly half a century after Smith's death, and the church only surrendered it as a compromise, in return for Utah statehood. Polygamy has dogged Mormonism ever since, and it will dog Mitt Romney's bid to become the Latter-day Saints' first president.

The fact is that polygamy makes lousy politics - for all the same reasons it will no doubt make great television.

Source
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 02:16 am
Many women, members of polygamous families, are against the way the future television series plans to present their lives. They say that this kind of lifestyle has proved to be extremely benefic for them, and the idea of sharing the marital chores with another woman didn't interfere with their lives in a negative way.


Quote:

Mormons Not Laughing About Polygamy Comedy 'Big Love'

Former 'Sister-Wife' Worries New HBO Series Will Minimize Problems
By JONANN BRADY


?- - HBO is taking a big gamble with its new comedy series "Big Love" about the trials and tribulations of a Viagra-popping polygamist and his three wives in suburban America.

The buzzed-about series, produced by Tom Hanks, is set to debut on March 12 after the megahit series "The Sopranos." But the risque show is already riling many Mormons, who say that it dredges up old stereotypes about the religion, which banned polygamy more than 100 years ago.

And some former polygamists worry that the comedy will minimize the real problems that polygamous families -- especially women and children -- can face.

In "Big Love," Bill Paxton plays Bill Hendrickson, a wealthy businessman from Salt Lake City who practices polygamy. With three families and three homes that he tries to hide from virtually everyone, Hendrickson has a ridiculously complicated -- and HBO hopes, watchable -- personal life. Jeanne Tripplehorn, Chloë Sevigny and Ginnifer Goodwin play his wives.


Feminist Dream or Living Hell?
The central conflict of "Big Love" revolves around Hendrickson's attempt to deal with the sex, fighting, jealousy and chaos that comes with having multiple families.

But some women say that kind of competition and backbiting isn't the reality of a polygamous life. Elizabeth Joseph writes on polygamy.com that a plural marriage is "the ultimate feminist lifestyle." She says that she's a busy journalist and that polygamy allows her to pursue her career while being assured her kids are well-tended at home.

Linda Earl, a member of a polygamous family in Central Park, Ariz., agrees. She told ABC News' "Primetime" in 2004: "I'm pretty independent. I don't want to have to dote on a guy every night. I don't want to make sure that he has a meal every night. Let somebody else do it that likes it."

And Earl said that jealousy and finding time for intimacy weren't problems either. "It's never really an issue of scheduling," she said. "Um, you just find out if there are ladies that have needs that might be a little more important than your needs. Especially, if a young lady is trying to have a child."

Her husband, Robert, who did not want his last name identified, is a wealthy businessman. Despite having numerous wives, he told "Primetime" that his life wasn't one big raucous sex party.

"I think you're confusing me with Mr. Hefner down in Los Angeles," Robert said. "There are much cheaper ways to have sex than to maintain a plural household."

While Earl finds her arrangement beneficial, other women in polygamous homes have said they have been forced into marriage against their will and subjected to abuse.

Don't miss "Primetime" on March 2 at 10 p.m. ET, when the show continues its reporting on polygamy, as a woman who escaped a polygamous community tries to go home after being gone for 18 months. Flora Jessop, 35, is a former "sister-wife" who fled her polygamous marriage and has devoted her life to liberating other women from the Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints, a tiny, breakaway group of Mormons.


Based in Colorado City, Ariz., the FLDS maintains absolute control over women's lives, Jessop said, not even allowing them to have contact with people outside the group.

Jessop said of her mission: "It's like taking someone straight from hell ?- and bringing them to heaven."

Vicky Prunty, 43, is another former "sister-wife" from a polygamous marriage. She left several years ago and founded Tapestry Against Polygamy, a group that aims to expose the practice and help women leave their polygamous marriages.

Prunty said her marriage was "a lot like 'Big Love' -- except I was in a double marriage, not a triple marriage. And my husband didn't take Viagra."

Joking aside, Prunty said that she had mixed feelings about the show. She hopes that it will bring attention to polygamy, but she's afraid it will gloss over some of the serious problems.

"It could minimize the problem," Prunty said. "It will probably hit more on the entertaining and humorous aspects of the life. … But it's not indicative of women with 12 children forced to have a baby every year."


Modern Mormons Miffed
Like Earl and her family, Hendrickson and his wives are supposed to be part of a fundamentalist sect of Mormonism. However, Mormonism banned taking multiple wives before the turn of the 20th century.

But that distinction is lost on most people, and many members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints feel that "Big Love" exploits out-of-date stereotypes.

The church, which is based in Salt Lake City and one of the fastest-growing religions in the United States, said in a statement: "Polygamy was officially discontinued in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in 1890. Any Church member adopting the practice today is excommunicated. Those groups which continue the practice in Utah and elsewhere have no association with Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and most of their practitioners have never been among our members."

"The Church has long been concerned about the continued illegal practice of polygamy, and in particular about reports of child and wife abuse emanating from polygamous communities today. It will be regrettable if this program, by making polygamy the subject of entertainment, minimizes the seriousness of the problem."

HBO has agreed to add a disclaimer at the end of the first episode, saying that the Mormon Church has officially banned polygamy. The show's creators also said they had spent more than two years researching the concept to make it realistic.

Prunty doubts that is possible.

"To really understand it, somebody would really have to live it," she said. "Otherwise they'd have a difficult time grasping the complexities of the lifestyle and the abuse."

But will Prunty be watching the first episode?

"Absolutely!" she said with a laugh.
Source
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 07:01 am
An interesting side-note is that the mormon polygamy community sees governement welfare as their primary means of income, saying they are squeezing the devil. virtually every prosecuted case that I know of in Utah as been under welfare fraud this hardly seems to match Republican ideals. Just last week a judge in Utah was forced to step down from the bench because he had 3 wives but he was not prosecuted for polygamy. Mormonism is a mystery to all who encounter it.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 09:27 am
Bigamy is a third-degree felony in Utah punishable by up to five years in prison and up to $5,000 in fines - Judge Steed had served for 25 years on the Justice Court in the polygamist community of Hildale in southern Utah.

Hildale itself is quite 'famous' as well: all five Hildale police officers have been suspended for six weeks for failing to fulfill a 40-hour annual training requirement last week as well.

And a former sworn Hildale officer is on trial this week in St. George on charges of bigamy and unlawful sexual activity.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 09:34 am
I would consider Utah the ideal place to live if I could survive under a theocracy.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 09:42 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Bigamy is a ... felony...
I though the judge had three wives. Is Trigamy legal in Utah?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 10:03 am
To the best of my knowledge the State of Utah has never prosecuted bigamy as a felony.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 10:13 am
Who but a complete Moron would believe Brigham Young gave the golden tablets back. It amazes me that peddlars of such nonsense are allowed to indulge in child abuse.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 10:15 am
dyslexia wrote:
To the best of my knowledge the State of Utah has never prosecuted bigamy as a felony.


We go there, don't we?
0 Replies
 
seaglass
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 10:18 am
My uncle married a Morman woman. He was not a Morman.

Her first husband was a Morman and they were married at the Morman Temple in Salt lake City. now my Morman auntie went into a great deal of detail about when women are married in the temple that wear these cotton drawers with a drawstring, and that they are not supposed to ever take them off. And she went into a great deal of detail as to how she took a bath. Dangling one leg over the tub, with the cotton drawers hanging while she washed her body.

I was 12 years old. Does anyone think she was pulling my leg. She did say however that she threw them away when she married my uncle at his insistenc4e.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 10:19 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
To the best of my knowledge the State of Utah has never prosecuted bigamy as a felony.


We go there, don't we?

Almost not not quite. The closest we will get is about 20 miles from Utah.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 10:24 am
So, no bigamy.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 02:05 pm
I think that was very big of him

Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Take it All - Discussion by McGentrix
Cancelled - Discussion by Brandon9000
John Stewart meets Bill O'Reilly - Discussion by Thomas
BEFORE WE HAD T.V. - Discussion by edgarblythe
What TV shows do you watch? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Orange is the New Black - Discussion by tsarstepan
Odd Premier: Under the Dome - Discussion by edgarblythe
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"? - Discussion by firefly
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The March of the Mormons
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/07/2026 at 01:37:43