1
   

Proof of Florida voting machine fraud found

 
 
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 09:13 am
Bev Harris's Latest Claims
The Booman Tribune
Friday 24 February 2006

Bev Harris of Black Box Voting has a new article up at her site. She also diaried it at Daily Kos where DHinMI promptly went on the attack.

Harris Claims:

The internal logs of at least 40 Sequoia touch-screen voting machines reveal that votes were time- and date-stamped as cast two weeks before the election, sometimes in the middle of the night.

Black Box Voting successfully sued former Palm Beach County (FL) Supervisor of Elections Theresa LePore to get the audit records for the 2004 presidential election.

After investing over $7,000 and waiting nine months for the records, Black Box Voting discovered that the voting machine logs contained approximately 100,000 errors. According to voting machine assignment logs, Palm Beach County used 4,313 machines in the Nov. 2004 election. During election day, 1,475 voting system calibrations were performed while the polls were open, providing documentation to substantiate reports from citizens indicating the wrong candidate was selected when they tried to vote.

Another disturbing find was several dozen voting machines with votes for the Nov. 2, 2004 election cast on dates like Oct. 16, 15, 19, 13, 25, 28 2004 and one tape dated in 2010. These machines did not contain any votes date-stamped on Nov. 2, 2004.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Watchdog Group Questions 2004 Florida Vote
By Brian Skoloff
The Associated Press
Thursday 23 February 2006

West Palm Beach, Florida - An examination of Palm Beach County's electronic voting machine records from the 2004 election found possible tampering and tens of thousands of malfunctions and errors, a watchdog group said Thursday.

Bev Harris, founder of BlackBoxVoting.org, said the findings call into question the outcome of the presidential race. But county officials and the maker of the electronic voting machines strongly disputed that and took issue with the findings.

Voting problems would have had to have been widespread across the state to make a difference. President Bush won Florida - and its 27 electoral votes - by 381,000 votes in 2004. Overall, he defeated John Kerry by 286 to 252 electoral votes, with 270 needed for victory.

BlackBoxVoting.org, which describes itself as a nonpartisan, nonprofit citizens group, said it found 70,000 instances in Palm Beach County of cards getting stuck in the paperless ATM-like machines and that the computers logged about 100,000 errors, including memory failures.

Also, the hard drives crashed on some of the machines made by Oakland, Calif.-based Sequoia Voting Systems, some machines apparently had to be rebooted over and over, and 1,475 re-calibrations were performed on Election Day on more than 4,300 units, Harris said. Re-calibrations are done when a machine is malfunctioning, she said.

"I actually think there's enough votes in play in Florida that it's anybody's guess who actually won the presidential race," Harris added. "But with that said, there's no way to tell who the votes should have gone to."

Palm Beach County and other parts of the country switched to electronic equipment after the turbulent 2000 presidential election, when the county's butterfly ballot confused some voters and led them to cast their votes for third-party candidate Pat Buchanan instead of Al Gore. The Supreme Court halted a recount after 36 days and handed a 537-vote victory to Bush.

Palm Beach County election officials said the BlackBoxVoting.com findings are flawed, and they blamed most of the errors on voters not following proper procedures.

"Their results are noteworthy for consideration, but in a majority of instances they can be explained," said Arthur Anderson, the county's elections supervisor. "All of these circumstances are valid reasons for concern, but they do not on face value substantiate that the machines are not reliable."

Sequoia spokeswoman Michelle Shafer disputed the findings, saying the company's machines worked properly. Sequoia's machines are used in five Florida counties and in 21 states.

"There was a fine election in November 2004," Shafer said.

She said many of the errors in the computer logs could have resulted from voters improperly inserting their user cards into the machines. The remaining errors would not affect the vote results because each unit has a backup system, she said.

Jenny Nash, a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of State, which oversees elections, said she was not aware of the report and had no comment.

Harris said one machine showed that 112 votes were cast on Oct. 16, two days before the start of early voting, a possible sign of tampering. She said the group found evidence of tampering on more than 30 machines in the county.

However, Harris said it was impossible to determine what information was altered or if votes were shifted among candidates.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 452 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 09:20 am
Which is why a machine that leaves no paper trail cannot be trusted for that job.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 10:27 am
Odd, Nimh hasn't once ever commented that BBB's existence on A2K involves lengthy cut & pastes (most without the curtesy of links) and short, snide (and sometimes admittedly funny) comments.

What could that mean?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 10:54 am
What do you want it to mean?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 07:44 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Odd, Nimh hasn't once ever commented that BBB's existence on A2K involves lengthy cut & pastes (most without the curtesy of links) and short, snide (and sometimes admittedly funny) comments.

What could that mean?

I have, actually - I've repeatedly complained about the endless copy/pastes (until I gave up for lack of reaction), and I've snapped a coupla times at comments of hers I considered out of line (recently still, at MA).

So no, McGentrix, I'm not just out to get poor wittle you, or them poor conservatives in general. (Dont know which of the two you were implying).

<shrugs>
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 07:58 pm
McGentrix's comments come out of the blue. You're just sitting there, casually reading, and all of a sudden you go, "WHAT THE HELL WAS THAT!!?"
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 08:13 pm
I was just wondering what the hell nimh has to do with voting machine tabulations. McG, being the ray of sunshine that he is, must have had some reason for it.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 07:34 am
The constant whining about this is further proof that democratic supporters and the entire democratic party,still do not have the ability to sell their ideas to a vast enough majority of Americans.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 07:41 am
The date discrepancies sounds like a problem with the machine's clocks.

Failure to synchronize the machines' internal clocks is idiocy on the part of the vendor.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 07:43 am
Quote:
Palm Beach County election officials said the BlackBoxVoting.com findings are flawed, and they blamed most of the errors on voters not following proper procedures.


Anyone who designs a user interface that can't be understood deserves to be raked over the coals. People don't hate computers, they hate lazy programmers.

And from what I've heard about these machines (using unsecured Access databases?!?!?) these are some of the laziest programmers on the face of the planet.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 08:05 am
Amen and amen.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 08:18 am
Lazy programming probably means lazy testing too.

You can never know the true bugs in any program until you have it in the real world environment. People will always manage to find or do something to the machine that was never anticipated by the programmers.

No paper trail means you never have to worry about finding errors in counting votes. You only have to worry about fatal errors that crash the machine. This has nothing to do with a malicious attempt to get one party elected. The real problem is if there are errors that cause votes to be miscounted then someone will find it and exploit it. For instance if the 3rd place on the ballot has a restriction in the maximum number of votes it would be easy to place a major candidate in that position to restrict their vote totals.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Proof of Florida voting machine fraud found
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2024 at 12:25:21