1
   

Democrats fail to find a message

 
 
Reply Sat 25 Feb, 2006 03:02 pm
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/nav/v3_banners/v3_ifh_banner.gif

Quote:
Democrats fail to find a message

By Justin Webb

BBC News, Washington


President Bush's popularity ratings have plummeted, but why, asks Justin Webb, is it that the opposition, the Democrats, are not surfing the opinion polls, capitalising on the Republicans' misfortunes and preparing to take over Congress when the election comes in the autumn?


In any list of America's greatest contributions to world culture - the kazoo, the electric guitar, drive-in fast food etc - space should be found, in my view, for an invention deeply ingrained in the life of this nation.

An invention on show to almost all Americans, every day.

That invention is the car bumper sticker.

And, in case you think you have seen them elsewhere in the world, let me just tell you that you have not.

At least not on the scale, and not of the sophistication of the American model.

Bumper stickers are a treasure trove of American free speech, expressing opinions of every stripe, on every subject.

Political message

Some are just plain weird.

A perfectly normal looking Chrysler in front of me the other day had "cops smell funny" emblazoned on the boot.


The stickers which have caught my attention and which I think are part of a noteworthy political phenomenon here are those that say, in bold letters, 're-defeat George Bush'


You can find entire religious credos summed up on the back of a Honda.
My favourite is: "Don't pray in my school and I won't think in your church."

And then, of course, there is politics.

"Work harder - millions on welfare need your money," I saw the other day on a pick-up truck in the Nevada desert.

But where I live, in the suburbs of Washington DC - and I am getting to the point now - the political messages tend to be the ranting of the disappointed American left.

"Somewhere in Texas there's a village missing an idiot," is a pithy example.

"It'll be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the air force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber" is a more plaintive, and frankly more difficult to read example.


For or against?

But the stickers which have caught my attention and which I think are part of a noteworthy political phenomenon here are those that say, in bold letters, "Re-defeat George Bush".


These, of course, refer to the election of 2000 in which more Americans voted for Al Gore, but which was awarded to Mr Bush by the Supreme Court after that voting snafu in Florida.
The stickers were part of the campaign of 2004, but were answered, it seems to me, by the result of that election.

The nation plainly elected Mr Bush - he won more than 50% of the vote - something Bill Clinton never managed.

So why is it that Democrats can't move on? The answer is that they don't know where to go.

On the Iraq war, for instance.

Are they for it or against it?

When it goes badly they are against it, but in the few months last year when elections were first held in Iraq they were rather for it.

Society's ills

The schizophrenia is epitomised by the choice of an anti-war Iraq veteran to run for a winnable senate seat in Ohio who has now been forced to pull out of the race because the party bigwigs got cold feet.


The Democrats need a message and a new way of communicating that message to a mass audience. They have neither


Democrats do not have a message on the key issues of our time.
Or, more precisely, they have several mutually exclusive messages.

Why is this?

Of course the American left has always had its fissiparous tendencies.

The old joke goes: I am not a member of any organised political party, I'm a Democrat.

But actually its bedrock was always pretty solid.

From World War II until the Reagan revolution the establishment in the US was socially progressive.

There was a belief that there was such a thing as society, and its ills could and should be tackled.

Changing world

Now, there are plenty of Americans who still hold those views, but the arteries which once fed them into the nation's vital organs, have been clogged or cut.


The American left have faded away


The universities do not have the power they did, professorial authority is less respected.

Most importantly, the worlds of entertainment and news (which used to pipe a vaguely left-wing message into the nation's homes) have been blown to bits by technological changes which render them powerless.

There are 600 channels on my television. I never watch any of them.

But if I did the chances that my neighbour has watched the same thing (particularly when you add the broadband internet options now available) have shrunk to virtually nil in the past few years.

The Democrats need a message and a new way of communicating that message to a mass audience. They have neither.

And do not be fooled by those who say this malaise is structural, at this stage of the electoral cycle there isn't a presidential candidate etc.

No, it is more than that. The American left has faded away.

Only their bumper stickers remain, like cockroaches after a nuclear holocaust.

"Re-defeat George Bush," they whine. Not knowing, not caring that the world has changed.

From Our Own Correspondent was broadcast on Saturday, 25 February, 2006, at 1130 GMT on BBC Radio 4. Please check the programme schedules for World Service transmission times.

BBC


Embarrassed
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 394 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Feb, 2006 05:55 pm
Why did you post this silly piece of fluff.

The author doesn't even know what the bumper sticker on which he bases his thesis signifies. He thinks it is in response the 2004 election (where Bush did with 52%), where any American knows that this sticker was in response to the 2000 election where Bush lost the popular vote and there was questions of voting irregularities that had to be resolved by the Supreme Court.

The author also doesn't seem to realize that what he is saying about the Democrats is always true about the part who is not in power (which at this moment happens to be the Democrats).

I agree with the idea of the title, the Democrats would do well to have a consistant message going into the 2006 election. I think this is starting to happen, even with frustrating failure to take a stand on issues from the war to Alito-- but this, although maddening, is the norm in American politics.


But outside of the first paragraph, this article reflects an Amazing ignorance of American politics.

So why did you post it?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 26 Feb, 2006 09:01 pm
Quote:
The author doesn't even know what the bumper sticker on which he bases his thesis signifies. He thinks it is in response the 2004 election (where Bush did with 52%), where any American knows that this sticker was in response to the 2000 election where Bush lost the popular vote and there was questions of voting irregularities that had to be resolved by the Supreme Court.


And you obviously missed what he wrote,or just plain didnt read it.
So,let me refresh your memory...

Quote:
These, of course, refer to the election of 2000 in which more Americans voted for Al Gore, but which was awarded to Mr Bush by the Supreme Court after that voting snafu in Florida.
The stickers were part of the campaign of 2004, but were answered, it seems to me, by the result of that election.


So,he quite clearly states that those stickers were in response to the 2000 election,and that they were used in the 2004 campaign.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Feb, 2006 07:16 am
There is a message out there for the Dems, but they aren't willing to embrace it. With 5 years to look back on them, Clinton's domestic policies were close to perfect, even if other aspects of his presidency were not. Fiscal moderate, social moderate, pro free speech, pro religion without catering to the extremes, etc. I would argue that he inherited a decent situation, but he didn't screw it up with increased spending or excessive tax cuts. Some of our foreign entanglements were misplaced, but that's another thread. I think a platform of "let's support our troops by repealing the last two Bush tax cuts ask all Americans to support our troops in Iraq" could be a winner, though I know the anti-tax crowd will disagree. As a moderate Republican, that could take my vote away from a social right wing Republican. I'm fairly tired of the SRW republicans in general. If the republicans come out with a moderate or someone from the traditional fiscally conservative, pro-business side, I don't think the Dems have a chance with any platform.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Democrats fail to find a message
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 05:23:04