0
   

have you ever noticed?

 
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 10:30 am
and i was going to pipe in with "kippers."





pikers...
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 11:40 am
Have you ever noticed that virtually nobody is willing, not to say eager, to question the underlying assumptions of his or her pet arguments--me included?
In that sense, we are not being very philosophical, but we are having fun dealing with the cleverness of others and exercising our own brains--which, for old farts like me, is very important.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 11:47 am
That's because having a tolerance for politicans and therefore political views is like tolerating a bad meal. You can often eat a bad meal because you might be hungry but then find it really isn't anything like what is described on the menu.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 11:55 am
Good observation, Wiz, but I also think that all of life may be characterized as a bad meal, except, of course, for those who are blessed with an enormous appetite.
Amor Fati.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 12:24 pm
There's a gourmet meal here and there. Actually, I am going out to dinner with a client in a few days at Fleming's Steak House in Fascist Island thanks to AMEX rewards. It will make MacDonalds taste even worse than ever (not that I ever frequent that place). That's a metaphor which also applies to politics and politicians. Once a real leader and consummate statesman gains power, it's really distressing to have to try and accept the mediocrity of someone like Bush -- true that he is right around the same position in the middle of the list of best Presidents as Clinton. Oh, what a stain on a black dress can wrought.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 01:38 pm
blatham wrote:

In my archaeology studies, I read a translation of graffiti found on a Roman wall from a couple of thousand years ago. It said (paraphrasing from memory)..."What have things come to? We are led by men who care only for themselves and in these dishonorable days the young are spoiled and lazy and show no understanding of or respect for traditions." If george didn't have that O' in his name, I'd suspect a grumpy ancestor.


Bernie always gets things backwards. It is he, not I, that constantly decries our leadership and the direction of modern currents in our life, while I cheerfully affirm them. As to the Roman ancestry - it is a distant possibility, considering the Celtic sacking of Rome in the 5th century BC.

Interesting also to note his self-association with Socrates: I prefer Nicias.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 01:48 pm
Socrates wot? Well I guess everyone needs an imaginary friend at some point in their life.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 03:12 pm
can't. paranoid. imaginary adversaries only.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Feb, 2006 02:53 pm
Re: have you ever noticed?
dyslexia wrote:
I am a liberal but that doesn't mean I follow some sort of "line" of thinking.

I believe the proper usage is 'librul', not 'liberal'.

georgeob1 wrote:
The words "Liberal" and "conservative" have become quite elastic over time. What was termed "Liberal" political and economic views in Europe a generation ago (and in some quarters, today) is what passes for "conservative" in the U.S. today.

You callin me a conservative? (Raises eyebrow)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Feb, 2006 08:05 am
JLNobody wrote:
Have you ever noticed that virtually nobody is willing, not to say eager, to question the underlying assumptions of his or her pet arguments--me included?
In that sense, we are not being very philosophical, but we are having fun dealing with the cleverness of others and exercising our own brains--which, for old farts like me, is very important.




I think many of us are, in the quietness and privacy of our own brains, but not in the cut and thrust of arguing about stuff.


It was amusing reading about "virtually nobody" in a post by JL Nobody, by the way.



patiodog wrote:
can't. paranoid. imaginary adversaries only.



Lol!

I miss you.

Well, not right this second, since you were here for me to respond to, but I do.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Feb, 2006 04:18 pm
Re: have you ever noticed?
Thomas wrote:


georgeob1 wrote:
The words "Liberal" and "conservative" have become quite elastic over time. What was termed "Liberal" political and economic views in Europe a generation ago (and in some quarters, today) is what passes for "conservative" in the U.S. today.

You callin me a conservative? (Raises eyebrow)


Yes, I am. But you already know that.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Feb, 2006 06:56 pm
nimh wrote:
Everybody fancies himself a strident, independent iconoclast ... and yet debate here is an ever-repeating cycle of the same issues and political faultlines.

Odd, that.
Can I pass on the strident part?

I would like: relaxed social policies, low expenditure government financial pollicies (expect in times of real emergency), strong antitrust, and freedom from government intermeddling in business and personal environs for the sake of political & religious ideologies.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Feb, 2006 07:00 pm
Strident seems to = I don't like your opinion.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/01/2025 at 10:27:34