Reply
Wed 15 Feb, 2006 07:45 am
Shooter Slips on a Silencer
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON
Who did this old guy think he was, coming between Dick Cheney and his helpless prey?
The luckless 78-year-old Texas lawyer, Harry Whittington, is in intensive care after a heart attack, with up to 200 pellets riddling his face and body ?- one stuck in his heart ?- from Dick Cheney's designer Perazzi Brescia shotgun. And still his friend, the vice president, is Swift-BB-ing him.
Private citizens have been enlisted to blame the victim. Maybe poor Mr. Whittington put himself in the wrong place at the wrong time. But he was, after all, behind Vice, not in front of him. And the hunter pulling the trigger is supposed to make sure he has a clear shot. Wouldn't it be, well, classy for Shooter to express just a bit of contrition and humility?
Instead, the usual sliming has begun, with the Cheney camp trying to protect the vice president by casting a veteran hunter as Elmer Dud.
Scott McClellan told the White House press corps that Katharine Armstrong, a lobbyist with government ties who owns the Texas ranch (and whose mother, Anne, was on the Halliburton board that hired Mr. Cheney as C.E.O.), "pointed out that the protocol was not followed by Mr. Whittington when it came to notifying the others that he was there."
As the story of the weekend's bizarre hunting accident is wrenched out of the White House, the picture isn't pretty: With American soldiers dying in Iraq, Five-Deferment Dick "I Had Other Priorities in the 60's Than Military Service" Cheney gets his macho kicks gunning down little birds and the occasional old man while W. rides his bike, blissfully oblivious to any collateral damage. Shouldn't these guys work on weekends until we figure out how to fix Iraq, New Orleans, Medicare and gas prices?
This version of "The Most Dangerous Game" neatly follows the four-step Bush-Cheney cycle:
Step 1: Set out to pick off what you think is an easy target, like quail this time or pen-raised and netted pheasant in the past, or a certain sanction-caged Iraqi dictator.
Step 2: In the corrupt company of lobbyist-contractor friends, botch things up. Ignore the peril at hand ?- as with, oh, Osama at Tora Bora, or Katrina, or the Iraq occupation ?- and with steely resolve, indulge your raging incompetence. (Oops.)
Step 3: Stonewall. Resist giving Congress information about 9/11 or Katrina; don't tell the public how you're tapping phones at home, setting up gulags abroad and making war and energy policy in secret. Why give the taxpayers, who are ponying up for these weekend hunting trips, the extraordinary news that Vice shot his hunting companion in the face and chest? Scott McClellan knew before yesterday's White House briefing at noon that Mr. Whittington was worse, but did not tell the reporters. He left that to Corpus Christi doctors, who spun the heart attack as "an inflammatory response to a metallic foreign BB."
Step 4: Admit no mistakes. Express sympathy. Blame the victim without leaving fingerprints by outsourcing the smear to the private sector.
Trent Lott joked in a meeting yesterday that Mr. Cheney was now the "shooter in chief," while other wags noted that Quayle was always a problem for Bushes.
Presidential staff members and lawmakers speculated yesterday about whether Shooter would resign and make room for Condi if Mr. Whittington did not survive. His death would trigger a more thorough police investigation and probably a grand jury.
"Are you crazy?" one Republican senator told a reporter. "He'd never quit." (Aaron Burr presided over the Senate after he killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel.)
The shooter in chief can't quit because he is the administration. Who'd even tell him to quit? If necessary, he'd probably make W. take the fall.
Despite efforts by Mr. McClellan to joke and urge reporters to get back to "the pressing priorities of the American people," the hunting debacle once more showed Mr. Cheney running the imperial show.
He didn't talk to the sheriff for 14 hours, or even call the president to notify him after the 5:50 p.m. accident. Vice left that to Andy Card, who called Mr. Bush at 7:30 p.m. to say there had been a hunting accident, without mentioning that Vice was the gunman. Soon after that, Karl Rove called Mr. Bush back with that little detail.
A reporter, surprised, pressed Mr. McClellan: "The vice president did not call the president to tell him he was the shooter?"
Usually when there's a White House cover-up, the president's in on it.
Utter an absolute drek...
If you shot someone, accidentally or otherwise, the FIRST thing that your lawyer will tell you is:
SHUT THE HELL UP AND SPEAK TO NO ONE!
the next thing he will tell you is:
Do not admit having done anything wrong.
These are your rights... one according to Miranda and according to the Constitution.
You have the right to remain silent.
You have the right against self incrimination.
Also, drawing a parallel between a hunting trip and Iraq is digusting.
This is a rather foolish and irresponsible article about a very sad hunting accident, in which the worst thing that even might be true is that Cheney was careless.
Ms. Dowd and the entire NY TImes staff want this man to DIE so they can continue their Bushwacking, anti america agenda.
Look, Cheney made a terrible mistake. The one with the gun is always wrong in a situation like this. This man was Cheney's friend and I suspect Mr. Cheney felt horrible for his friend and his family.
The media feels they should be told about this as it happened. Well, the media is wrong again.
I am sure, the group attended to Mr. Wittington's needs FIRST and made sure his family was notified FIRST, not the media.
the worst thing is that Cheney didn't come clean with the public or the whitehouse immediately casting more shadows of doubt on the "transparency" of the Bush Admin.
dyslexia wrote:the worst thing is that Cheney didn't come clean with the public or the whitehouse immediately casting more shadows of doubt on the "transparency" of the Bush Admin.
So VP Cheney automatically looses his rights to remain silent and speak to his attorney before he makes a statement (Which according to his 'Right against self incrimination', he isn't even required to do.)
Being elected to public office does NOT strip you of these Rights.
Is this even an issue?. If youre worried about Miranda rights in a hunting accident you are stretching credulity here. In a car accident, or hunting accident, the main concern is to help the victim, not worry about issues of self incrimination.Youve been watching too much Law and Order.
According to the news, at least they got that"aid the victim" part right.
Fedral wrote:Utter an absolute drek...
If you shot someone, accidentally or otherwise, the FIRST thing that your lawyer will tell you is:
SHUT THE HELL UP AND SPEAK TO NO ONE!
the next thing he will tell you is:
Do not admit having done anything wrong.
These are your rights... one according to Miranda and according to the Constitution.
You have the right to remain silent.
You have the right against self incrimination.
Also, drawing a parallel between a hunting trip and Iraq is digusting.
Wow, all of a sudden the pronouncements of them there activist judges who show no damn respect for the konsteetooshun, figure pretty highly with the wingnuts.
Is this irony delicious or what!