1
   

Bush Tags Bloggers As Terrorists!

 
 
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 07:13 am
http://www.patriotdaily.com/bmpix/logo.gif

Quote:
2/12/2006: Bush Tags Bloggers As Terrorists!

(Cross posted at Daily Kos, Booman Tribune, My Left Wing and MyDD)

All bloggers should know that if the government views the substantive content of your blog as "activist calls" or "deliberate misinformation campaigns," then you may be a domestic "terrorist."

While not a surprise, given all that has transpired in Bush's term, it still was a shocker to read that bloggers are now "terrorists." The nature of blogger terrorist acts should be a concern for both liberal and conservative bloggers: "Deliberate misinformation campaigns" may well describe actions taken by right-wingers and "activist calls" describes actions by bloggers regardless of political affiliation.

Homeland Security completed its "Cyber Storm" wargame to test how our government "would respond to devastating attacks over the Internet from anti-globalization activists, underground hackers and bloggers." Given that homeland security ran the "wargame," one may infer that the nature of the attacks by bloggers must be national security related. And, given that the major national security fear of our government is terrorists, then it looks like bloggers have made our government's hit list of potential terrorists. But, what is the nature of this "terrorist crime" that was the subject of these wargames?

source


And here I was hoping I was merely an irritation!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,439 • Replies: 29
No top replies

 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 08:06 am
I loved the inclusion of "anti-globalization activists" and bloggers in the "terrorist" definition.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 08:09 am
Does he get to just unilaterally decide this? Is this another one of those "inherent powers?"

Does this mean that people who blog about Iraq with a different view than the president, are now terrorist?

Why don't this kind of stuff scare everybody, conservative and liberals alike?
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 08:16 am
Yes
0 Replies
 
Deler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 09:19 am
I'm So Thirsty

Hello Mr Thirsty

Or should I call you So
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 10:10 am
Deler wrote:
I'm So Thirsty

Hello Mr Thirsty

Or should I call you So

He's with Hopkin Green Frog.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 10:11 am
p.s. I'll find my frog.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 10:40 am
Wonkette can run, but she can't hide....
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 10:48 am
If you ask me, it's about time something was done with those anti-americans! How dare they use that freedom of speech thing in such a derisive manner!
0 Replies
 
Deler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 01:42 pm
Even freedom of speech has it's responsibilities

Speaking of which I forgot to quote my last post to 'Robot Chicken'
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 01:55 pm
I gotta confess, I am confused on all these replies, guess I am just not that good at this sort of thing.

So I will just ask point blank. Is it the article for real or is it one of those satire things?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:04 pm
f4f,
you left out this significant part...

"The Internet survived, even against fictional abuses against the world's computers on a scale typical for Fox's popular "24" television series. Experts depicted hackers who shut down electricity in 10 states, failures in vital systems for online banking and retail sales, infected discs mistakenly distributed by commercial software companies and critical flaws discovered in core Internet technology.

Some mock attacks were aimed at causing a "significant cyber disruption" that could seriously damage energy, transportation and health care industries and undermine public confidence, said George Foresman, an undersecretary at the Homeland Security Department."

Why did you ignore this part.
This is what the whole exercise was about.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:27 pm
mysteryman wrote:
f4f,
This is what the whole exercise was about.


There are other indications that the Bush administration deems bloggers well within the reach of any definition of terrorist, if for no other reason than the crime of dissent and criticism. There are also indicators that relevant parties would be somewhat prepared to assist in the nabbing of terrorist bloggers:

(1) In what may have been a precursor to US bloggers, the US military and government apparently were not offended (at least did not take any publicly disclosed action to free the blogger) when an Iraqi blogger was arrested, interrogated and imprisoned for the crime of reading comments on another blogger’s website at a public cafĂ©:

Quote:
“Then finally I understood why I was there, after few hours. Security guards at the university had printed out all the websites I was reading while I was online there. They were accusing me of “reading terrorism sites” and “having communications with foreign terrorists”.

“Do you know what these pages are?”

I looked at them and figured out they were the comment section of Raed in the Middle!!

I opened the comments section while browsing in the university, read some comments, and didn’t even post anything. But these people don’t seem to know what the internet is, and they don’t speak English, so I was a major suspect of being an assistant of al Zarqawi maybe! Or that I have a terrorist group of my own, with foreign connections!

I was accused of terrorism, and sent to jail after they decided that I’m not helping myself because I am not helping them!!!


(2) US plans to data mine blogs for stated purpose of finding terrorist information to connect the dots to prevent a terrorist attack:

“The U.S. government is developing a massive computer system that can collect huge amounts of data and, by linking far-flung information from blogs and e-mail to government records and intelligence reports, search for patterns of terrorist activity.”

(3) “The CIA is quietly funding federal research into surveillance of Internet chat rooms as part of an effort to identify possible terrorists, newly released documents reveal.”

(4) American Internet providers have assisted foreign countries to jail bloggers for substantive content posted on their blogs:

“Last December, Microsoft shut down the Web site of a dissident Chinese blogger. A few months earlier, Yahoo gave Beijing the name of a dissident Chinese journalist. He got ten years in jail for his Web postings. Ironically, Google's Chinese kowtow comes as the company is resisting efforts by the U.S. government for access to its records.”

(5) Indymedia was a subject of a secret, international terrorism investigation in which US government seized its hard drives. A Texas Internet company turned over hard drives pursuant to a court order under an international treaty governing crimes of terrorism, kidnapping and money laundering.

(6) The MSM has shown its willingness to paint bloggers and any lefty journalists as the domestic evil axis of treasonists so that the American people will understand the need to arrest bloggers to make this country safe from terrorists.

(7) The CIA now has its own bloggers and a government website that are part of a revised CIA office for monitoring, translating and analyzing publicly available information. It is good news that the CIA is evaluating publicly available information in the fight against terrorism. The problem is we now know that when our government says “monitoring,” it’s not just al-Qaeda.

(8) The Bush administration refused to turn over control of the Internet to an international body, preferring to maintain unilateral control over the Internet. The fear is that “policy decisions could at a stroke make all Web sites ending in a specific suffix essentially unreachable.”

It should be noted that some of these indicators on their face are equivocal, but perhaps should be considered in the context of actions and policies of this administration. In this context, the Bush wagons are circling bloggers. And, once the perception is created that bloggers are a danger to national security, that perception is hard to unravel. The danger is that the American people will continue to follow Bush’s lead like sheep frightened by the terrorist wolf...Continued...
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:36 pm
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:40 pm
My concern in a nutshell is that when I voice my dissent about any Bush administration policy on the internet I will be lumped in with terrorist. Pretty soon I might start monitoring what I say so that I don't get lumped in with them. In this manner the government manipulates debate in the country. Simply put; this is not right that the country I always felt was so free is allowed to become like China and other countries we have always complained about.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:43 pm
I would wait until you read about it a more reputable source than the one given before changing what you post.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:46 pm
How can they monitor all of us together?

America is it's people. Not Democrats, not Republican, not the president. It's it's people and it's constitution. Presidents come and go but the people and the constitution are here to stay.

United the people have authority over any king.

That is who we are and that is why we are here.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:53 pm
revel wrote:
I gotta confess, I am confused on all these replies, guess I am just not that good at this sort of thing.

So I will just ask point blank. Is it the article for real or is it one of those satire things?

That's a matter of perspective; its perpetrators and proponents neither intend nor are aware of the self-pardody they accomplish ... which has much to do with their perplexed dismay at their party's electoral fortunes.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:54 pm
McGentrix wrote:
If you ask me, it's about time something was done with those anti-americans! How dare they use that freedom of speech thing in such a derisive manner!

Given your willingness to trade your civil liberties for the perception of safety, I'm actually uncertain if this is intended as sarcasm.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2006 02:54 pm
McGentrix

Quote:
I would wait until you read about it a more reputable source than the one given before changing what you post.


Two great rebuttal techniques, either blame Clinton or blame the source.

Republicans can't lose. :wink:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush Tags Bloggers As Terrorists!
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.28 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 03:34:55