Joe Nation wrote:real life wrote:Joe Nation wrote:............a deist, just like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson...........
A common misconception. Neither were.
So was Franklin a Lutheran ? Baptist? Anglican? Methodist?. I know his son was baptized in an Anglican church but that was at the behest of his wife. He, like John Adams, attended numerous churches from time to time, Adams even found himself at a Romist Mass at the Church of St. Mary's once, he was nonplused and Franklin tried to be a Presbyterian but gave it up for his own study and reflection.
Neither man would recognize what passes for organized religion today.
As for Jefferson, five hundred A2K points if you can name a church he was a member of. He too attended a lot of services but he was not only desirous of a government not "intermedling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises... ." but also of religions which would give a man a chance to think for himself.
Joe(I forgot the Quakers)Nation
xingu wrote:What do you want to bet that Real thinks they were Christians.
Might also mention that George Washington and Thomas Paine were Deist.
So you think someone may have been a Deist? Maybe they were. Maybe not.
How 'bout documenting your assertion ?
Helpful Hint A: Useful quotations would be those by Founding Fathers that deny their belief in prayer, for instance, since that would be God intervening in the affairs of men. A Deist would probably NOT believe in a God who answers prayer.
Helpful Hint B: Also helpful would be quotations by Founding Fathers that deny their belief in the Bible since that would be God intervening to reveal Himself to man and show to man His character, teach His ways, etc. A strict Deist would probably NOT believe in God intervening in this fashion, either.
Helpful Hint C: Very helpful would be quotations by Founding Fathers that deny that Jesus Christ was in ANY fashion a message, a messenger , an example or representative of God in ANY way. Good Deists would NOT be very consistent if they believed in God intervening in human history in this fashion (think: Star Trek and violating the Prime Directive)
Since Jesus Christ's life has arguably substantially altered human history (some believe for the good, others not) then if God intervened to "send" Jesus in any way, this would really put His credentials as the "hands off watchmaker" at risk.
Well, how 'bout it? Please quote in the words of the Founding Fathers only, not in the interpretive biographical sketches that others have written to redefine them.
Let THEM say that THEY hold to Deistic beliefs.
Ready. Go.