1
   

Democrats are Communist says Horowitz

 
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:26 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
roverroad wrote:
The problem with Communism is when a dictator gets his hands on the country.


Would be a problem with other ideologies as well, I think.


Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to get everybody to toe the line in a "commune" rather than everybody minding their own business.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:28 am
roverroad wrote:

That's because of dictatorship, not communism. Comunism is not bad, dictatorship is!


Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to make it work. If you don't learn from history, you are destined to repeat it.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:40 am
okie wrote:
Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to get everybody to toe the line in a "commune" rather than everybody minding their own business.


Could you provide us with a link that points us towards a definition of communism, okie?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:49 am
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to get everybody to toe the line in a "commune" rather than everybody minding their own business.


Could you provide us with a link that points us towards a definition of communism, okie?


Communism means living in a commune. For simplicity sake, hows that?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:50 am
okie wrote:
old europe wrote:
okie wrote:
Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to get everybody to toe the line in a "commune" rather than everybody minding their own business.


Could you provide us with a link that points us towards a definition of communism, okie?


Communism means living in a commune. For simplicity sake, hows that?


Wrong.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:52 am
I have no interest in splitting hairs. Go ahead provide your definition.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 11:54 am
Okay, okie, I don't know if you really want to go down that road, but maybe we should expand on the concepts we are talking about. I'm quite sure there have been numerous threads here on A2K about left/right or communism/capitalism, but as we're already talking about it:

Would you be willing to look up the definition of communism here (or wherever you want to) and then come back and continue the discussion?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:07 pm
okie wrote:

Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to make it work. If you don't learn from history, you are destined to repeat it.


Sorry to come to this, but that was a joke - right?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:08 pm
You know, the Democrats are communists (or socialists, depending on the mood) line is tiresome and outdated. The fact that some people acknowledge that the profit motive doesn't solve all problems does not make them communists. That kind of extreme labeling is designed to stigmatize one's opponents in lieu of actual debate. It's also a chicken **** tactic to take. Panzade is right, if we are to believe that Democrats are the extreme of their ideas, then we must do the same for Republicans. That would make them fascists.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:09 pm
Very Happy

I haven't missed the irony, Walter!
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:09 pm
Water
Walter Hinteler wrote:
okie wrote:

Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to make it work. If you don't learn from history, you are destined to repeat it.

Sorry to come to this, but that was a joke - right?


Walter, sadly some A2K posters are limited by their compulsion to only communicate with cliches.

BBB
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:10 pm
So ... if I found myself agreeing with both Walter and Fedral, does that mean I'm schizo?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:10 pm
Re: Water
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
okie wrote:

Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to make it work. If you don't learn from history, you are destined to repeat it.

Sorry to come to this, but that was a joke - right?


Walter, sadly some A2K posters are limited by their compulsion to only communicate with cliches.

BBB


That's not even a cliche - that's an ad absurdum.

Quote:
Communism: system of political and economic organization in which property is owned by the state or community and all citizens share in the common wealth, more or less according to their need.
britannica.com
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:12 pm
nimh wrote:
So ... if I found myself agreeing with both Walter and Fedral, does that mean I'm schizo?


Not if we rotate your brain clockwise.
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:15 pm
I take it all of you favor communism. Can you point to a favorite prime example of past or current success for your favorite governing style. Lets not talk about text book examples of how it is supposed to work. Lets talk about how it has worked. Educate me here. You are the professors, I am the ignorant student from Oklahoma.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:18 pm
Re: Water
Walter Hinteler wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
okie wrote:
Communism, by definition, requires a dictator to make it work. If you don't learn from history, you are destined to repeat it.
Sorry to come to this, but that was a joke - right?

Walter, sadly some A2K posters are limited by their compulsion to only communicate with cliches.
BBB

That's not even a cliche - that's an ad absurdum.
Quote:
Communism: system of political and economic organization in which property is owned by the state or community and all citizens share in the common wealth, more or less according to their need.
britannica.com

------------------------------------------
Walter, I love ad absurdum. I thought you coined a new word and then I discovered that you are a sneaky, very smart rascal.---BBB
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:19 pm
okie wrote:
I take it all of you favor communism.


Methinks thou doest assume too much.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:35 pm
okie wrote:
I take it all of you favor communism.


No, I don't. How did you get that?
(Actually, I'm a member of a party which fights for more than 125 years with the communists: the Social-Democratic Party of Germany.)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:41 pm
okie wrote:
I take it all of you favor communism.

Where in heaven's name did you get that from? I'm an anti-communist, and I will never vote for a communist. For a socialist, yes, a social-democrat, sure, but never a communist.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2006 12:42 pm
okie wrote:
I take it all of you favor communism.


Nope.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 06:41:33