1
   

For those of you praising Bush's comments in SOTU re: oil...

 
 
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 03:50 pm
Quote:


Bush aides clarify statements about oil
Bush aides claim that Bush wants to decrease, not replace completely, U.S. consumption of foreign oil.
BY KEVIN G. HALL
[email protected]

WASHINGTON - One day after President Bush vowed to reduce America's dependence on Middle East oil by cutting imports from there 75 percent by 2025, his energy secretary and national economic advisor said Wednesday that the president didn't mean it literally.

What the president meant, they said in a conference call with reporters, was that alternative fuels could displace an amount of oil imports equivalent to most of what America is expected to import from the Middle East in 2025.

But America still would import oil from the Middle East, because that's where the greatest oil supplies are.

The president's State of the Union reference to Mideast oil made headlines nationwide Wednesday because of his assertion that ''America is addicted to oil'' and his call to ``break this addiction.''

Bush vowed to fund research into better batteries for hybrid vehicles and more production of the alternative fuel ethanol, setting a lofty goal of replacing ``more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025.''

He pledged to ``move beyond a petroleum-based economy and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past.''

AN EXAMPLE

Not exactly, though, it turns out.

''This was purely an example,'' Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said.

He said the broad goal was to displace foreign oil imports, from anywhere, with domestic alternatives. He acknowledged that oil is a freely traded commodity bought and sold globally by private firms. Consequently, it would be very difficult to reduce imports from any single region, especially the most oil-rich region on Earth.

Asked why the president used the words ''the Middle East'' when he didn't really mean them, one administration official said Bush wanted to dramatize the issue in a way that ''every American sitting out there listening to the speech understands.'' The official spoke only on condition of anonymity because he feared that his remarks might get him in trouble.

VOLATILE REGION

Presidential advisor Dan Bartlett made a similar point in a briefing before the speech. ''I think one of the biggest concerns the American people have is oil coming from the Middle East. It is a very volatile region,'' he said.

Through the first 11 months of 2005, the United States imported nearly 2.2 million barrels per day of oil from the Middle East nations of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq. That's less than 20 percent of the total U.S. daily imports of 10.062 million barrels.

The Bush administration believes that plug-in hybrids with rechargeable batteries, hydrogen-powered cars and new ethanol products could reduce the total daily U.S. oil demand.


SOURCE
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 575 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 03:58 pm
Edit: Moderator: Link Removed

'The Energy Department will begin laying off researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in the next week or two because of cuts to its budget.

A veteran researcher said the staff had been told that the cuts would be concentrated among researchers in wind and biomass, which includes ethanol. Those are two of the technologies that Mr. Bush cited on Tuesday night as holding the promise to replace part of the nation's oil imports.'

That's two lies right off of the bat.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 06:26 pm
Too bad the "Bush supporters" thread is locked....
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 06:39 pm
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn..............
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 08:06 pm
Sturgis wrote:
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn..............


Yeah, I know. Just another Bush lie. Starting to happen so often that calling him on it is losing it's appeal.

Still, worth noting.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 08:16 pm
what the %*#@ is wrong with that guy ?!?! his bullshitting has gotten so blatant that it's insulting.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Feb, 2006 11:48 pm
Say you walk into an apartment building and there's a fellow in the lobby who's upset at how long he's been waiting for the elevator and you notice he hasn't pushed the button to call that elevator. Likely, you'd wonder at how the fellow would not catch on regarding the critical relevance (to elevator riding) of that omitted step

Quote:
Eager to reduce spending, the Bush administration falsely claimed savings of more than $1.3 billion in the Department of Veterans Affairs to justify cuts to health care services, congressional investigators say.

The report by the Government Accountability Office is the latest to document funding woes at the VA, which currently offers health care to 7 million out of 24 million eligible veterans. It found that the agency used misleading accounting methods and lacked documentation to prove its claimed savings.
link

Such purposive deceits and misrepresentations from this administration are near daily occurences, when not coming in mulitples per day, that is. The SOTU oil "He wasn't speaking literally" example noted above another in the endless list of examples we all know of, likewise the related cut in research funding also noted above.

And as with that fellow standing in front of the elevator door, you wonder just how it might be that there are folks in the USA who don't quite get the critical relevance to their democracy of leaders being honest with them and the rest of the country.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Feb, 2006 07:48 pm
blatham wrote:
The SOTU oil "He wasn't speaking literally" example...


that's one of things that just kills me.. at least once a week, i hear one of the admin's toadies proclaiming "this president says what he means and means what he says".

so how come there's always someone out there "explaining what he meant" ?????? <insert your fave exaspiration emoticon here>
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » For those of you praising Bush's comments in SOTU re: oil...
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 08:45:15