0
   

Newt the salamandar Ginrich

 
 
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2003 06:15 pm
With all the intellectual acumen of a ninth century one-eyed monk, our dearly beloved Newt blasts the only credible, though marginalized, member of the Bush administration:
It's been barely a week since the U.S. took control of Baghdad, but the Pentagon is already embroiled in a new war, this time with the State Department.
The opening salvo was delivered Tuesday morning by the former Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives (1995-98) and member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, Newt Gingrich, at the neo-conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI).
Gingrich, who is close to Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld, aimed the full fury of his rhetorical fire at the State Department, accusing it of actively subverting President George W. Bush's agenda in Iraq and beyond.
"The last seven months have involved six months of diplomatic failure and one month of military success," Gingrich charged, adding, "Now the State Department is back at work pursuing policies that will clearly throw away all the fruits of hard-won victory."
It was a stunning attack from someone so closely identified with Rumsfeld and the neo-conservative hawks around him. "I've never seen a wholesale attack on America's entire diplomatic establishment like this," said Charles Kupchan, a foreign-policy expert at Georgetown University. "This is fundamentally about ideology and the efforts of the neo-conservatives to institutionalize their victories over the moderate and liberal internationalists."
It also illustrates the degree to which relations between the State Department and the
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 942 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2003 07:39 pm
Hell! And we Australians went into conniptions over what was seen as 'Anti-American' rhetoric! Someone should point out where his constituency is located!

For the full text goto AEI NEWS
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2003 07:42 pm
Dyssie - can you (or anyone) explain what:

"America cannot lead in the age of democracy and 24 hour television"

actually means?
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2003 07:14 pm
Quote:
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich accused the State Department of undermining President Bush's foreign policy and denounced Secretary of State Colin Powell's plan to go to Syria as "ludicrous".

Gingrich, speaking at the American Enterprise Institute, directed much of his fire Tuesday at the department's Near East Bureau. The institute, a conservative think tank, has helped fill major spots in the Bush administration.

Regarding Powell's trip to Syria, the Republican former House leader said that to meet "with a terrorist-supporting, secret police-wielding dictator is ludicrous.''


The Guardian

http://www.bartcop.com/rummy-saddam.jpg

Somebody remind Tom DeLay to have Newt investigated for "seditious comments against the government".
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2003 07:27 pm
perfect
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2003 08:02 pm
and lookie here at that 'ludicrous' Truman!

http://www.nau.edu/library/speccoll/images/thumbs/3624.jpg
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2003 09:56 pm
I think Newt's just jealous - Powell gets all the good seats on the planes...
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2003 10:23 pm
If you heard the statement made by Newt on C-Span you would know that his remarks were aimed at the beaurocratic culture of the State Dept and he made a point of not making a personal attack on Colin Powell (I'm well aware that Powell is ultimately responsible) All he wants (Newt) is for the State Dept to be streamlined similar to what Rumsfeld has done at Sec Def.

You must admit that State is a broken instrument and has been ever since WWII---recent example: The woman in Saudi Arabia responsible for issuing Visas----she was still willy nilly handing them out to any Saudi well after 9/II----Powell had to personally order her fired after it made big news. Powell has done many things right ----- no thanks to his dept.

Remember also that State is responsible for winning the hearts and minds of those in other countries---would you consider that effort a success?

Another example is the mess in Afghanistan---State is responsible for that effort now. All they've been able to do is cause the rent of any suitable home in Kabul to be exhorbitant and they've ordered fleets of white Range Rovers to rush from one side of Kabul to the other. They wouldn't dare go out into the countryside to see what's really happening.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Apr, 2003 10:31 pm
Oh, that's right, I forgot. Foreign policy is only in the president's sphere of influence when it's working.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Newt the salamandar Ginrich
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 02:34:19