0
   

Democrat says Alito hearings may be pointless

 
 
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 04:40 pm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 456 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 04:48 pm
well the people in charge are ****, so they are putting a **** yes man on the court to make sure they can do all the **** they want without having to explain **** to anyone.

That's the technical explanation.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 04:51 pm
No ****! Shocked
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 04:54 pm
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
well the people in charge are ****, so they are putting a **** yes man on the court to make sure they can do all the **** they want without having to explain **** to anyone.

That's the technical explanation.


Does that same sentiment hold true when a Dem President nominates someone to the bench,or just when repubs do it?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 04:54 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
No ****! Shocked


would I **** you?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jan, 2006 04:56 pm
mysteryman wrote:
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
well the people in charge are ****, so they are putting a **** yes man on the court to make sure they can do all the **** they want without having to explain **** to anyone.

That's the technical explanation.


Does that same sentiment hold true when a Dem President nominates someone to the bench,or just when repubs do it?


let's narrow it down even further to these shitheads currently in chatge....
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jan, 2006 03:09 am
"Despite all the crazy talk about the flaming liberals who want leftist extremists on the federal bench, the fact is that the Democratics presidents have nominated mainstream, able jurists. That's not the case with Republican presidents. Do you remember Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas?" Andros

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/01/how-clinton-treated-hatch/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Quote:
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/07/01/how-clinton-treated-hatch/

How Clinton Treated Hatch

When President Clinton made his two judicial nominations to the Supreme Court, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) was the ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The following is an excerpt from Hatch's autobiography:

[It] was not a surprise when the President called to talk about the appointment and what he was thinking of doing.

President Clinton indicated he was leaning toward nominating Bruce Babbitt, his Secretary of the Interior, ... Clinton asked for my reaction. ... I told him that confirmation would not be easy.

Our conversation moved to other potential candidates. I asked whether he had considered Judge Stephen Breyer of the First Circuit Court of Appeals or Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. President Clinton indicated he had heard Breyer's name but had not thought about Judge Ginsberg.



What was that appellation again, the great uniter or some such thing?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jan, 2006 01:01 am
Quote:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Democrat says Alito hearings may be pointless
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.74 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 09:00:02