squinney wrote:Well, yes. But the partisan rhetoric while attempting to get an actual count seems to have overridden the publics interest in the truth. In other words, they (we) chose to listen to the pundits, the talking heads and choose who we listened to and believed based on party rather than demanding to know the actual count. (truth)
Is the "actual count" the "truth"? It may be the mathmatically correct total of the ballots present (assuming there is absoluttely no question on who the ballots were cast for and no biases on the part of those tabulating the ballots) but it doesn't account for ballots cast illegally. How can that represent "the truth"?
THAT is, IMO, the greater problem. I don't think people have lost interest in the truth. They've lost faith in the ability to get the truth. The general public isn't gullible enough to accept the word of politicans or reporters as being the truth any more (with good reason!).