Sofia wrote:Craven--
Since you referred to my succinct response to the article ( BS), I felt you were addressing me with that post.
I have seen others respond with very short, to-the-point words or phrases, and not be pushed to explain further.
I would like to be treated like they are treated, and allowed to post my opinion, whether it be a long, thoughtful treatment of the subject, or a simplified one word response.
I wish you'd stop thinking I'd treat you any differently. Why would you merit differentiated treatment?
I very clearly called for all the deractors to provide supporting arguments, usually a plural is not used to single anyone out. And BS is "open source" as in it falls under the GPL license as in anyone can use it and when I mentioned it I did not have you in mind.
If you do not wish to sustantiate your disparagement of the article that's absolutely no problem, others are already taking care of that and they have been very interesting. If you want to play the special treatment angle I will have you know that my world does not revolve around you.
Did I single timber out? Or max? Come on! They don't play poor me, they responded with support for their arguments. If you don't want to I have no problem, but this special treatment angle is plain silly.