Doktor S wrote:George wrote:The difference being that many of those who believe in guardian angels
see this belief as following from their faith. In the case of Christians, they
base this belief on the references to angels in scripture where, in some
instances, they perform as protectors.
Now if (and only if) you embrace a belief system that includes angels,
then they are not superstition.
No, more like, if you embrace a belief system that includes angels, you will deny your superstitions are superstitions with special pleading.
I would suggest that by your criteria, there would be no such thing as 'superstition'. Who see's their own beliefs as superstitions?
Unless of course, you are suggesting superstition has no objective definable meaning and can only be applied in a subjective context, which doesn't seem to be the case...
Superstition usually means believing that certain things have effects that
cannot logically be attributed to them. Walking under a ladder, for
example is not logically related to bad fortune. So far, that seems
objective, no?
It gets subjective when someone embraces a faith. You may contend
(and probably do) that that in itself is illogical and everything that
proceeds from it must be illogical. Then everything connected to faith is
illogical, angels included. Angels are superstition.
For many believers, the angel is not superstition; it is a part of the
belief system. The angel can protect because the angel has been so
empowered by God. A rabbit's foot has no power because God has not
given it any. If you grant the system, the rest follows. Otherwise not.