1
   

Bush Pulls Plug on Iraq Reconstruction (big surprise)

 
 
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 12:04 am
Published on Tuesday, January 3, 2006 by the Guardian / UK

Bush Pulls the Plug on Iraq Reconstruction
$18bn funding to stop at end of year

by Suzanne Goldenberg

The Bush administration has scaled back its ambitions to rebuild Iraq from the devastation wrought by war and dictatorship and does not intend to seek new funds for reconstruction, it emerged yesterday.

In a decision that will be seen as a retreat from a promise by President George Bush to give Iraq the best infrastructure in the region, administration officials say they will not seek reconstruction funds when the budget request is presented to Congress next month, the Washington Post reported yesterday.

The $18.4bn (£10.6bn) allocation is scheduled to run out in June 2007. The move will be seen by critics as further evidence of the administration's failure to plan for the aftermath of the war.

A decision not to renew the reconstruction programme would leave Iraq with the burden of tens of billions of dollars in unfinished projects, and an oil industry and electrical grid that have yet to return to pre-war production levels.

The decision is a tacit admission of the failure of the US rebuilding effort in the face of a relentless insurgency. Nearly half the funds earmarked for reconstruction were diverted towards fighting the insurgency and preparations to put Saddam Hussein on trial.

At least $2.5bn earmarked for Iraq's dilapidated infrastructure and schools was diverted to building up a security force. And funds originally intended to repair the electricity grid and sewage and sanitation system were used to train special bomb squad units and a hostage rescue force. The US also shifted funds to build 10 new prisons to keep pace with the insurgency, and safe houses and armoured cars for Iraqi judges, the Post said.

The reconstruction fund was tapped for the hundreds of millions of dollars required to hold elections and for four changes of government. It also helped pay for the tens of millions required to establish a criminal justice system, including $128m to examine several mass graves of Saddam's victims.

While 3,600 projects will be completed by the end of the year, the cost of security accounted for as much as 25% of each project, according to the office of the Special Inspector General for Iraqi Reconstruction. A US congressional report in October forecast that many reconstruction projects were unlikely to get off the ground because of the spiralling costs of security.

Production on Iraq's national electrical grid remains at 4,000 megawatts, 400 megawatts below pre-war levels, with the average Iraqi receiving less than 12 hours of power a day. Oil production, which was supposed to provide the funds for Iraqi reconstruction, according to the Pentagon's pre-war planning, also remains well below pre-war levels, mainly due to sabotage by insurgents. Iraq's refineries are producing 1.1m barrels of oil a day, compared with 2.6m barrels on the eve of the invasion.
The cut-off to reconstruction programmes adds to increasing speculation that the administration is planning at least a partial withdrawal of troops from Iraq before November's US mid-term election.

It marks a retreat from a promise by Mr Bush in 2003 to provide Iraq with the best infrastructure in the region. Cool

Yesterday, however, a Pentagon official disavowed that ambition. "The US never intended to completely rebuild Iraq," Brigadier General William McCoy, the Army Corps of Engineers commander overseeing the work, was quoted in the Post as saying. "This was just supposed to be a jump-start." Question

The Post also notes that fewer than 30% of Iraqis were even aware of ongoing reconstruction projects, suggesting the US has failed to extract public relations benefit from any of the reconstruction projects it has completed.

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006

Sounds about right. Lies, lies and more lies. Doesn't the fool chimp Pres have any shame?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 875 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 12:56 am
What a sham and a disgrace to the Iraqis. At least, they should be returned to the same level of existence that they had before the invasion. They are certainly not better off now. But, Bush has his oil and that's what it was about.

I hope Bush and family realize that they have created enemies forever. I can't see the Iraqis forgiving the Americans ever, can you? Funds for electricity, sewage, etc went for special bomb squad units? Oh boy.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 01:39 am
What a shocker!! Shocked
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 05:32 am
we'll need the manpower, resources and money to invade Iran.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:20 am
pachelbel wrote:
What a sham and a disgrace to the Iraqis. At least, they should be returned to the same level of existence that they had before the invasion. They are certainly not better off now. But, Bush has his oil and that's what it was about.

I hope Bush and family realize that they have created enemies forever. I can't see the Iraqis forgiving the Americans ever, can you? Funds for electricity, sewage, etc went for special bomb squad units? Oh boy.


Which was what level?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:22 am
I read an article yesterday comparing pre war stats to present and everything today is less...I'll try to find it...
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:32 am
here ya go....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/02/AR2006010200370.html
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:50 am
Sounds like they are making some progress. However, I did not see any listing reflecting the numbers of murders and rapes by govt officials.

"At the same time, the hundreds of Americans and Iraqis who have devoted themselves to the reconstruction effort point to 3,600 projects that the United States has completed or intends to finish before the $18.4 billion runs out around the end of 2006. These include work on 900 schools, construction of hospitals and nearly 160 health care centers and clinics, and repairs on or construction of nearly 800 miles of highways, city streets and village roads."
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:54 am
WWAAAHHHH!!!!! We want Bush out of Iraq!!!!

WWWAAAAHHHHH!!! Bush is leaving Iraq!!!!!

WWAAAAHHHHH!!! We don't know what we want!!!!

WWAAAHHHHHH!!!! We hate Bush!!!!!
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:55 am
I wonder how many of those were okay before Bush invaded?
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 07:55 am
McGentrix wrote:
WWAAAHHHH!!!!! We want Bush out of Iraq!!!!

WWWAAAAHHHHH!!! Bush is leaving Iraq!!!!!

WWAAAAHHHHH!!! We don't know what we want!!!!

WWAAAHHHHHH!!!! We hate Bush!!!!!


Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 08:07 am
Rolling Eyes

We can get a large majority of our military out of Iraq and still live up to our commitments by contributing money and man power help for the sole purpose of rebuilding and help with security (if wanted) with all decisions left up to them.

The thing is that the way it is now, the whole solvency thing is a sham. When we don't like the way they do things, we simply ignore their wishes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/03/AR2006010301373.html
0 Replies
 
englishmajor
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jan, 2006 11:38 pm
revel wrote:
Rolling Eyes

We can get a large majority of our military out of Iraq and still live up to our commitments by contributing money and man power help for the sole purpose of rebuilding and help with security (if wanted) with all decisions left up to them.

The thing is that the way it is now, the whole solvency thing is a sham. When we don't like the way they do things, we simply ignore their wishes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/03/AR2006010301373.html


Thanks for your intelligent response. We get quite a few unintelligent responses, like the one above yours, but they are ignored as they are irrelevant.

It's a sham and a shame that the US plans to leave Iraq, a 4000 year old city, in such a state. They caused the mess, the least they could do is get them up and running before the pre-emptive strike. So much for promises from the US. But, all they wanted was the oil - and they got it, for now. Thanks also for the link.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 01:51 am
If this is some sort of indication that Bush inc. are going to pull the troops out, then in the long run it will prove to be the way to go, as staying there in any shape or form is only prolonging the agony.
The Iraqis are quite capable of organising a total rebuild, and can use their oil revenues to do it properly, provided that Bush inc. has left any oil in the region, that is.
Eventually, as most people know, Iraq will either fragment (with a large section immediately forming an alliance with Iran), or it will remain whole, but face decades and decades of political infighting, bordering on civil war.
Either way, the future "post Saddam" Iraq, once it is allowed be independent and speak it's mind, will not look very favourably upon the USA and UK.

Personally, I think that your Fuhrer finally realises this, and doesn't want to spend any unnecessary money. He reckons that he might as well cut and run now, as it will make very little difference to the future. Ruthless and harsh, but good business sense which, after all, was what Iraq was all about from the beginning.

I bet that Halliburton et al won't be too pleased though.
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 03:15 am
Ridiculous. I don't care if we have to run our own country into bankruptcy, Iraq should be restored to at least pre-war levels of infrastructure.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 03:41 am
Yep.

We broke it....
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 03:48 am
dlowan wrote:
Yep.

We broke it....


I learned a lot in pre-school.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 03:51 am
Oh?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 07:19 am
McGentrix is it supposed to irritate those who hate bush to hear it? Nice try.....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush Pulls Plug on Iraq Reconstruction (big surprise)
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 02:50:33