US Steps up Airstrikes

Published on Sunday, January 1, 2006 by the Sunday Times of London

US Steps un Airstrikes in Iraq

by Sarah Baxter in Washington, Ali Rifat in Baghdad and Peter Almond

AMERICAN forces are dramatically stepping up air attacks on insurgents in Iraq as they prepare to start the withdrawal of ground troops in the spring.

The number of airstrikes in 2005, running at a monthly average of 25 until August, surged to 120 in November and an expected 150 in December, according to official military figures.

The tempo looks set to increase this year as the Americans pull back from urban combat, leaving street fighting increasingly to Iraqi forces supported by US air power.

"The bottom line will be that as the Iraqi army and police gain in competence, they will be able to take on more and more of the territory," said General Peter Pace, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, announcing a cut in troop numbers from 160,000 to fewer than 138,000 by March.

The intensification in the air war comes as Iraqi politicians struggle in the aftermath of last month's elections to put together a coalition government that will satisfy the disaffected Sunni minority, which ran Iraq under Saddam Hussein.

"We are insisting on a national unity government," said Adel Abdel Mahdi, a leading member of the Shi'ite United Iraqi Alliance, the likely election winner.

The Sunni bloc, allied to the secular party of Iyad Allawi, the former prime minister, has been secretly discussing the terms of a possible political deal with insurgent groups. But those groups' leaders have a long list of demands, chief of which is a timetable for American withdrawal as well as the release of prisoners, an effective rehabilitation of Saddam's former ruling Ba'ath party and the disbanding of Shi'ite and Kurdish militias.

Insurgent sources said that they are also including Al-Qaeda in Iraq in their talks as its involvement was vital if a deal was to work.

President George W Bush promised in a pre-Chistmas speech that America will leave Iraq only when "victory" has been achieved, but the term is being quietly redefined.

Dov Zakheim, a senior Pentagon official during Bush's first term in office, said: "The goal is not democracy, it is a united Iraq that doesn't bother its neighbors. There is no law that says American troops have to be in the most hostile areas."

The shift to air power is part of that policy. Determined to reduce "collateral damage", the American military is relying on laser or satellite-guided bombs that can strike rooms or buildings without killing large numbers of civilians.

The bombs are also getting smaller: 500lb devices are becoming the norm, rather than those of 1,000lb or 2,000lb common in recent conflicts, and 3,000 new 7in 250lb devices are on order. Allen Peck, a US air force general, said that in some cases the 100lb Hellfire missile is used: "It won't knock down a house, but it can be effective in taking out a car."

In an example of the strategy, two US F16 fighters last week dropped two 500lb laser-guided bombs on three men planting roadside explosives in Kirkuk province, killing them and seven others.

However, some experts insist that even the smallest, most precise bombs cannot replace boots on the ground.

"It's transitory. You hit it, even occupy it, but then the insurgents return when you've gone, like Falluja last year," said Wing Commander Andrew Brookes of the International Insititute for Strategic Studies.

"Even a 400lb bomb has a wide area of blast and you are quite likely to kill some civilians. Kill a wife, children, mother or uncle and people become so angry the terrorist cycle starts all over again."