cicerone imposter wrote:real life wrote:cicerone imposter wrote:We all make our own choices from what we learn within the society in which we live. I don't judge other people's choices made to eat human flesh in the past. I can only control my own behavior. Natural and acceptable are subjective human choices.
Since you cannot even bring yourself to state that cannibalism is wrong, I wonder on what basis do you make the other judgements that I have heard from you condemning various actions of Christians, condemning political figures with whom you disagree......
On what basis do you come to the conclusion that anybody may be wrong about anything?
It's wrong when one person tries to enforce their personal (religious or political) beliefs on another person that results in denying them control over their own bodies or equal rights.
So how is cannibalism 'having control over one's OWN body'? Apparently you can't tell the difference between one's OWN body and the body of another (same problem you have on the abortion issue, you ignore the medical fact that the unborn has his OWN body as well).
So cannibalism is ok with you then? And murder might be a bit distasteful, but apparently you have no firm convictions against it either, based on your post about the wife killing her husband.
But there are some things you consider wrong and you do judge others based on your standard of what you believe is right and wrong. We could easily pull together MANY quotes where you have done so. (For instance you believe it is WRONG to deny someone an abortion if they want one.)
So my question is, on what basis do you determine right from wrong, and why do you deny that you do it when you obviously do?