Left hand path vs Right hand path religion.

Why do you defend LaVey. He's nothing. His philosophy religion can stand without him as all truth can stand without any god or religion.

What if I told you the 1% most powerful men on the planet are descendent of this philosophy and that you are their slave.

I still can't understand how there wouldn't be subsets based one's concept of free will.

There once was a devoted priest who wished to see both
heaven and hell, and God gave way to his pleading.
The priest found himself before a door which bore no name. He trembled as he saw it open before him into a large room where all was prepared for a feast. There was a table, and at its centre a great dish of steaming food. The smell and the aroma inflamed the appetite.

Diners sat around the table with great spoons in their hands, yet they were shrieking with hunger in that terrible place. They tried to feed themselves, and gave up, cursing God, for the spoons that God had provided were so long that they could not reach their faces and get the food to their tongues. So they starved, while their dish of plenty lay amongst them. The priest knew their screams were the cries of hell, and as this understanding came, the door closed before him.

He shut his eyes in prayer and begged God to take him away from that terrible place. When he opened them again, he despaired, for the same door stood before him, the door that bore no name. Again it opened, and it gave onto the same room. Nothing had changed, and he was about to cry in horror. There was the table, and at its centre the steaming dish, and around it were the same people, and in their hands the same spoons.

Yet the shrieking had gone, and the cries and the curses had changed to blessings; and nothing had changed, yet everything. For with the same long spoons they reached to each-other's mouths and fed one another, and they gave thanks to God.

And as the priest heard the blessings, the door closed. He fell to his knees, and he too blessed God who had shown him the nature of heaven and hell, and the chasm - a hair's breadth wide - that divides them.

I never attacked you. I attacked things you chose to defend and I am ignorant.

Why did you call Neo small minded?

Why did you say you would rather be dead then follow eastern philosophy?

If I am guilty then you are guilty too. and I am guilty.

I'm still wondering about Howard levys ego?

and arin't you concerned about Nietzches contradictions to Satanism?

There once was a devoted priest who wished to see both
heaven and hell, and God gave way to his pleading. . .

Nietzsche's argument for the ubermensch, while repudiating Christianity's slave morality, avoids the failings of satanism.

By the way, zen is not a religion in the usual sense of the term--the usual sense would indicate that all religions are, by definintion, right-hand-path ideologies.

In zen what one comes to realize is that he was never separate from the whole; he realizes (not achieves) his unity with all else--meaning the delusion of ego-separateness.

And THAT Doktor, is the major failing of satanism as you've described it: its glorification of the delusion: ego-self