0
   

Left hand path vs Right hand path religion.

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 02:50 pm
Doktor S Wrote:

Quote:
Sure. All the time. Everything from subtle psychological manipulation to outright force. The ends justify the means.
Here is an example. Let's use how I attained my position at my company.
The fellow that had my job was my superior. I didn't like him, because he sucked at his job and was a general suckass to the top brass.
The situation: He had a good friend of mine in the department fired for erroneous reasons.
The twist: 50 grand in digital transfers and evidence of illegal entry into a protected system found on his computer.
My friend got his job back, with a raise, and I took over as department head. Oh my.


From what I gather from this post, you manipulated data to bring about your friend getting his job back with a raise and you got promote? Is I am reading that correctly?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 02:54 pm
I wasn't talking about Howard LaVey.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:07 pm
Can you tell I just got up from a nap? Laughing

What I meant to say is ...you got promoted? and Am I reading that correctly?

Sleepy brain right now. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:15 pm
MA,
Yes, you read it correctly.
Amigo,
Right...so..what is your point?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:16 pm
Doktor S,

So, you essentially broke the law and lied about someone to get what you wanted?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:21 pm
What happened to poor little Howards ego?
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:40 pm
Amigo wrote:
What happened to poor little Howards ego?

If your use of 'howard' instead of 'anton' was supposed to be a barb, it was completely ineffectual. Lots of people change their names. So what?
What are you trying to say? Communication skills obviously aren't your forte..are you anywhere near coming up with a point? English IS your first language, right?
Spit it out man.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:42 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Doktor S,

So, you essentially broke the law and lied about someone to get what you wanted?

I didn't break any laws. I had no obligation to speak up. Nothing I did was on a computer I didn't have legal access to.
Anyway, I'm not going any further into detail on this one, it was an example.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:45 pm
Are there subsets within the classifications or any blending between right and left?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:46 pm
Doktor S,

No further detail is needed. I just needed to know the basics. So, what you actually did was wrong to me (and I would think many others), right?

So, it seems to me that satanism is giving you license to do what you want to do and not consider how it effects someone else?

What of the man that lost his job? What about his family?
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:47 pm
Not really. The supreme authority is either in you or outside of you. I supose pantheism is the middle ground.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:52 pm
pantheism?
0 Replies
 
Krekel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 04:05 pm
Watch out: contains semi-spoilers for 'The Machinist'




In The Machinist, Bale's character Trevor Reznik also faces a few crossroads. During the movie, he always takes the left-hand path (while in his car); except in the end; when he finds true redemption. Also, the left-hand path in the movie is within: to forget, to ignore, to forgive oneself, et cetera. The right-hand path, however, comes from without. In the end of the movie, this (the right-hand path) seems to offer true redemption!


(Dunno if this is useful to you, but it is to me)











[/spoiler]

So, in the end, peace from within, can give you some form of temporary peace, but it is, I think, just not enough! You must make peace with your milieu as well. Peace from within is a condition for redemption, but not redemption itself.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 04:07 pm
I used to think I was smart. Then I read the above.
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 04:51 pm
Laughing neo

me too! me too!
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 07:34 pm
Neologist asks about subsets. Dok, answers that the only significant distinction is between "in here" and "out there". I would suggest that within the "in here" set there may be a significant difference between "ego-oriented" (Satanists) and ego-rejecting mystics (e.g., zen buddhists).
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 07:41 pm
"id"oriented anarchists, "ego' is a sell-out position.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 08:01 pm
Doktor S,

So, in order to be a Satanist, you give up the concept of right and wrong?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 08:12 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Doktor S,

So, in order to be a Satanist, you give up the concept of right and wrong?

mother angel, you seem to have a weird sense of right and wrong, perhaps you think in terms of "morals" which have nothing to do with right and wrong.
I would suggest you try to think of the idea of ethics.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 08:28 pm
dys,

I do not have a weird sense of what is right and wrong and I meant just what I posted.

I wanted to know if to be a Satanist you give up the concept of right and wrong.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 08:28:08