kickycan wrote:You're always saying that. Why do you think god was such a jerk back then? And what made him so different in your mind? It's like if your husband beat you for twenty years, then one day, after killing his own son, he decided to be nice, and you're like, Oh god is good...
I don't get it.
I think the whole sacrifice thing was supposed to end with Abraham. According to the story (whether history or myth), when Abram found the true God, he was so grateful that he felt obliged to make what he felt was the ultimate sacrifice, as it was tradition to make sacrifices to appease God. But right as he was about to kill his son, right at the ritual's peak, he realized the mistake he was making and stopped. He realized that this was not the way to praise this "new" God. The old, blood-sacrifice tradition was no longer relevant.
The idea that God sacrificed his only son is, I think, misunderstood by a lot of people. I think Jesus' crucifixion is seen as a sort of "blood sacrifice", similar to the old tradition of Abram.
As I (and many others) understand it, Jesus was the son of God, but not the
only son of God (at least not as it's usually meant). He was not physiologically special or abnormal. He was not sent here to die, but to live.