1
   

Israel's Labour quits coalition amid upheaval

 
 
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 02:36 pm
20 Nov 2005
Tali Caspi

TEL AVIV, Nov 20 (Reuters) - Israel's Labour party voted on Sunday to quit Ariel Sharon's coalition ahead of early elections as the prime minister weighed abandoning his own Likud in a move that could remake Israeli politics and peacemaking.

Leftist Labour's central committee, encouraged by fiery new leader Amir Peretz, voted overwhelmingly to leave the government it had joined to help Sharon counter rightist Likud rebels who opposed his withdrawal from the occupied Gaza Strip.

"Let the revolution begin," said party official Eitan Cabel as he announced the result of the vote in a show of hands.

The withdrawal of the Labour party was the expected first step in a week that could reshape Israeli politics, thrown into turmoil since union leader Peretz defeated veteran peacemaker Shimon Peres in a surprise leadership vote.

Israel Radio said Labour cabinet members were likely to hand in resignation letters on Monday. They are already written.

The big question now is whether Sharon will leave Likud to form a new centrist alliance that could allow him to pursue his plans for ending conflict with the Palestinians without having to battle Likud opponents over giving up West Bank land.

But the gamble would be among the biggest of a military and political career of high-stakes risk taking. Polls indicate 77-year-old Sharon would be uncertain of winning elections, now expected in February or March, with a new party.

"He is liable to set in motion a political migration on a scale that the Israeli political map hasn't witnessed since the State of Israel was founded," wrote Shimon Shiffer in the best-selling Yedioth Ahronoth daily.

Confidants said they believed Sharon was leaning towards leaving Likud, a party which he helped co-found and long championed the settlement of land captured in the 1967 war, territory that Palestinians want for a state.

An announcement was possible on Monday, when Sharon was due to meet Likud members of parliament, aides said.

Anticipating that Sharon would bolt and cause a leadership challenge, some Likud ministers suggested they would be ready to stand against Sharon's old rival Benjamin Netanyahu, who resigned as finance minister to oppose the Gaza pullout.

One of Sharon's closest allies, Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, met Likud members of parliament to discuss forming a new party.

SPECULATION MOUNTS

Adding to speculation that he was planning to break away, Sharon made comments that appeared to be aimed at wooing ousted Labour leader Peres -- the old coalition partner was notably absent as the party voted to leave the government.

Sharon agreed last week with Peretz to hold elections between late February and the end of March.

A provisional election date is due to be agreed by Wednesday ahead of a debate in parliament to set in motion the process of holding an early vote. One member of the team discussing a date acceptable to all parties said March 28 looked likely.

Peretz stands on a platform of rolling back spending cuts and free-market reforms as well as withdrawing from West Bank settlements and talking peace with the Palestinians as soon as possible.

"I intend to march Israel forward where social justice and peace will go together," said Peretz. At the same time he vowed that "the war on terror will be without compromise."

While ready to go further than many in Likud in giving up land, Sharon aims to keep major West Bank settlements and has ruled out talks on statehood unless Palestinians disarm militants waging an uprising.

Palestinians fear Sharon aims to unilaterally set a border along the lines of a barrier being built deep inside the West Bank. Israel says the barrier stops suicide bombers. Palestinians call it a land grab.

Recent polls suggest a Sharon-led Likud would beat Labour. At the head of a new party, bringing in some Labour members, Sharon would be neck-and-neck with Peretz. Likud would then be pushed into third place. (Additional reporting by Corinne Heller in Jerusalem)
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 605 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 03:11 pm
Ariel Sharon was the instigator in destroying theOslo Agrrement when he deliberately went to the Temple Mount. An evil young man Amir killed Prime Minister Yikzak Rabin and destroyed a chance for peace in the Middle East.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 03:59 pm
bookmark
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 06:42 pm
'Political earthquake' shakes Israel as Sharon quits Likud
By Eric Silver in Jerusalem
Published: 21 November 2005
Ariel Sharon threw Israeli politics into turmoil last night by deciding to leave the Likud and run for re-election as prime minister at the head of a new centre party committed to a compromise peace ­ on his terms ­ with the Palestinians.

He told his closest allies this was the most difficult decision he had made in his 32-year political career. Mr Sharon himself welded the Likud from four right-wing parties in 1973. He is expected to go to President Moshe Katsav today and call for elections in the New Year.

One of his advisers said shortly after midnight local time: "He thought this was the right thing to do for the country. He believes that the Likud party can no longer fulfill its historical role in running the country with responsibility." http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article328291.ece
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 06:55 pm
Wow, he really did it, then?

Thats guts.

Bookmarking..
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Nov, 2005 09:28 pm
Yes, surprised hell out of me too. I'm going to have to dig in a bit to understand the present dynamics here.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Nov, 2005 07:26 am
Eitam: Sharon's new party is bid to return to 1967 borders http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/648095.html "Likud is today paying the price for betraying the nation," said MK Effi Eitam (National Zionist Party), who quit the government over the disengagement plan. He later told Israel Radio that Sharon "is leaving the Likud to return Israel to the 1967 borders."
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Nov, 2005 08:31 am
Haaretz has their link screwed up, so yours goes wrong too...

Here it is... http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=Beilin&itemNo=648095

But the claim (return to 67 borders) looks like an "ain't sharon scarey" line, rather than a Sharon-voiced policy. Pity.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Nov, 2005 08:37 am
I hadnt read much about Sharon's impending decision yet, but FWIW this was what BBC News had from the Israeli press before the weekend, when they were all speculating about whether he would, or wouldn't jump...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4448288.stm
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 05:11 am
Quote:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20051125.wisrael1125/BNStory/International/
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 05:16 am
Quote:
Secret British document accuses Israel

FO paper says international laws are being violated and peace jeopardised

Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
Friday November 25, 2005
The Guardian

A confidential Foreign Office document accuses Israel of rushing to annex the Arab area of Jerusalem, using illegal Jewish settlement construction and the vast West Bank barrier, in a move to prevent it becoming a Palestinian capital.
In an unusually frank insight into British assessments of Israeli intentions, the document says that Ariel Sharon's government is jeopardising the prospect of a peace agreement by trying to put the future of Arab East Jerusalem beyond negotiation and risks driving Palestinians living in the city into radical groups. The document, obtained by the Guardian, was presented to an EU council of ministers meeting chaired by the foreign secretary, Jack Straw, on Monday with recommendations to counter the Israeli policy, including recognition of Palestinian political activities in East Jerusalem.

But the council put the issue on hold until next month under pressure from Italy, according to sources, which Israel considers its most reliable EU ally.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,1650426,00.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 05:24 am
Quote:
The Likud has embarked on a drive to prevent key activists from following Prime Minister Ariel Sharon out of the party.

Thirteen Likud ministers and MKs have already joined Sharon's walkout, and they are certain to try to bring Likud mayors and heads of local Likud chapters along with them.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/649914.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Nov, 2005 05:27 am
Quote:
A day before the Labor primaries, Silvan Shalom said that Amir Peretz's victory would pose a problem for the Likud. Peretz exploited this statement to score another few votes at the polls - an outcome that Shalom had not intended, of course. He had only wanted to help himself. Shalom meant to say that while an earthquake was underway in Labor and a Sephardi from a peripheral town was assuming the party leadership, the Likud could not remain behind. It had to place a suitable candidate at its head - a "Tunisian" to run against a "Moroccan."

Uzi Cohen, the Likud's ubiquitous man in the field, openly said as much this week. Until now, he was a big supporter of Benjamin Netanyahu, but this week, Cohen defected to the Shalom camp, announcing: "After the upheaval in Labor, there are quite a few Knesset seats that are going to be distributed on an ethnic basis, so it would be best if Silvan were head of the Likud - There is no way that an Ashkenazi like Bibi could beat a Sephardi like Peretz." Shlomo Madmon, chairman of the Likud branch in Kfar Sava also joined Shalom's supporters, saying, "With all due respect to Bibi, we have to offer a response to Amir Peretz."

MK Haim Katz (Likud) declares that out in the field, revolution is afoot. People of Moroccan descent - Likudniks included - are speaking in loving terms about Peretz. "Dialna" - one of ours, they're saying. Just as the Ashkenazim once used to say in Yiddish "Unsere."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/650041.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Israel's Labour quits coalition amid upheaval
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 10:27:43