1
   

GOOD: Big Oil testified in front of Congress. BAD: They lied

 
 
Reply Wed 16 Nov, 2005 09:37 am
Quote:
Big oil met with Cheney task force

Industry officials denied meetings as recently as last week


A White House document shows that executives from big oil companies met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001 -- something long suspected by environmentalists but denied as recently as last week by industry officials testifying before Congress.

The document, obtained this week by The Washington Post, shows that officials from Exxon Mobil Corp., Conoco (before its merger with Phillips), Shell Oil Co. and BP America Inc. met in the White House complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being debated.

In a joint hearing last week of the Senate Energy and Commerce committees, the chief executives of Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and ConocoPhillips said their firms did not participate in the 2001 task force. The president of Shell Oil said his company did not participate "to my knowledge," and the chief of BP America Inc. said he did not know.

Chevron was not named in the White House document, but the Government Accountability Office has found that Chevron was one of several companies that "gave detailed energy policy recommendations" to the task force. In addition, Cheney had a separate meeting with John Browne, BP's chief executive, according to a person familiar with the task force's work; that meeting is not noted in the document.

The task force's activities attracted complaints from environmentalists, who said they were shut out of the task force discussions while corporate interests were present. The meetings were held in secret and the White House refused to release a list of participants. The task force was made up primarily of Cabinet-level officials. Judicial Watch and the Sierra Club unsuccessfully sued to obtain the records.

?'May be lying'
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), who posed the question about the task force, said he will ask the Justice Department today to investigate. "The White House went to great lengths to keep these meetings secret, and now oil executives may be lying to Congress about their role in the Cheney task force," Lautenberg said.

Lea Anne McBride, a spokeswoman for Cheney, declined to comment on the document and said that the courts have upheld "the constitutional right of the president and vice president to obtain information in confidentiality."

The executives were not under oath when they testified, so they are not vulnerable to charges of perjury; committee Democrats had protested the decision by Commerce Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) not to swear in the executives. But a person can be fined or imprisoned for up to five years for making "any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation" to Congress.

Alan Huffman, who was a Conoco manager until the 2002 merger with Phillips, confirmed meeting with the task force staff. "We met in the Executive Office Building if I remember correctly," he said. A spokesman for ConocoPhillips said he was looking into the apparent discrepancy between Huffman's statement and the testimony of the company's chief executive.

Exxon spokesman Russ Roberts said the company stood by chief executive Lee R. Raymond's statement in the Senate hearing. In a brief telephone interview, former Exxon vice president James Rouse, the official named in the White House document, denied the meeting took place. "That must be inaccurate and I don't have any comment beyond that," said Rouse, now retired.

Ronnie Chappell, a spokesman for BP, declined to comment on the task force meetings. Darci Sinclair, a spokeswoman for Shell, said she did not know whether Shell officials met with the task force, but they often meet members of the administration. Chevron said its executives did not meet with the task force but confirmed that they provided a letter to President Bush outlining the company's recommendations.

Based on Secret Service records
The person familiar with the task force's work, who requested on the condition of anonymity out of concern about retribution, said the document was based on records kept by the Secret Service of people admitted to the White House complex. This person said most meetings were with Andrew Lundquist, the task force's executive director, and Cheney aide Karen Y. Knutson.

According to the White House document, Rouse met with task force staff on Feb. 14, 2001. On March 21, the task force staff met with Archie Dunham, who was chairman of Conoco. On April 12, according to the document, the task force staff met with Conoco official Huffman and two officials from the U.S. Oil and Gas Association, Wayne Gibbens and Alby Modiano.

On April 17, the task force staff met with Royal Dutch/Shell Group's chairman, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Shell Oil chairman Steven Miller and two others. On March 22, the task force staff met with BP regional president Bob Malone, chief economist Peter Davies and company employees Graham Barr and Deb Beaubien.

Toward the end of the hearing, Lautenberg asked the five executives: "Did your company or any representatives of your companies participate in Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001?" When there was no immediate response, Lautenberg added: "The meeting . . . "

"No," said Raymond.

"No," said Chevron Chairman David J. O'Reilly.

"We did not, no," said ConocoPhillips chairman James Mulva.

"To be honest, I don't know," said BP America chief executive Ross Pillari, who came to the job in August 2001. "I wasn't here then."

"But your company was here," Lautenberg replied.

"Yes," Pillari said.

Shell Oil president John Hofmeister, who has held his job since earlier this year, answered last. "Not to my knowledge," he said.

Research editor Lucy Shackelford contributed to this report.


SOURCE
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 613 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Nov, 2005 09:50 am
By the way, just last week the neocons at Free Republic were boasting and laughing about how the Dem who requested that the Big Oil reps go under oath was essentially told to shut the hell up:


Quote:
Sen. Stevens (R-Alaska): I shall not administer an oath today--

Sen. Cantwell (D-Washington): Mr. Chairman.

Stevens: --and we look forward to questions...Senator Cantwell?

Cantwell: Mr. Chairman, I did send you a letter signed by eight of my colleagues asking that the witnesses be placed under oath. This rare joint hearing--

Stevens: I did not yield for you to make a statement. We're ready to go. We have a statement process--

Cantwell: Mr. Chairman, I would like the committee to vote on whether we swear--

Stevens: There will be no vote. That's not in order at all. It's not part of the rules that any vote can be taken to administer an oath. It is the decision of the Chairman, and I have made that decision.

Cantwell: Mr. Chairman, I move that we swear in the witnesses.

Stevens: And I rule that out of order.

Sen. Boxer (D-California): I second the motion.

Stevens: Thank you very much. That's that last we're going to hear about that, because it's out of order
.



Click here to go to the audio of the exchange (and boasting freepers)
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Nov, 2005 10:57 am
Yeah. The Grand Old Party is having a grand old time while they're in the majority. Just as they had a grand old time during that farce of an impeachment.

High-handed treatment like this has a way of coming around to bite one in one's ass.
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Nov, 2005 12:34 pm
Executive Privelege should never be allowed when it involves invasion for another country's oil reserves.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Nov, 2005 12:45 pm
Stevens is a shill for the oil industry...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » GOOD: Big Oil testified in front of Congress. BAD: They lied
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/16/2026 at 11:39:45