1
   

The Argument Clinic - Monty Python

 
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 06:06 pm
So you admit it, you two are conspiring in this kind of activity?!?!?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 06:25 pm
In showing me without the Bunny suit? Well, no - and, if we were, you would have to include Roger.
But, hey - haven't you noticed that ALL the photos here are of people WITHOUT their Bunny suits?

You been in that tomb too long, Pharaoh Phuffle - the world has CHANGED, I tell you...
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 06:59 pm
Thats not a pharao, thats a bunny. A beautiful, golden-haired, mask-faced bunny.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:02 pm
It's Tutanbloodykhamen!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:03 pm
dlowan wrote:
Nimh - you stun me with your meanness.


Question
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:04 pm
dlowan wrote:
Tutanbloodykhamen!


No ... it's not Tutanbloodykhamen! It can't be! I would recognize Tutanbloodykhamen blindfolded in a snowstorm. Best Uighur throatsinger from Mongolia there ever was, that Tutanbloodykhamen.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:07 pm
nimh wrote:
Yes, they are.



Shocked Shocked Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Mad Mad Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:08 pm
Smegging is Tut!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:11 pm
http://images.google.com.au/images?q=tbn:gdfrgM3b8p0C:www.pyramag.com/images/tutankhamen.gif

http://images.google.com.au/images?q=tbn:gdfrgM3b8p0C:www.pyramag.com/images/tutankhamen.gif
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:12 pm
Wow, thats a lot of extreme non-smiley faces in reply to a classic Monty Python retort ...

is this getting too serious? I was thinkin' that each of my posts here was just waaaay too bizarre for anyone to ever take 'em seriously ... but I guess I'd better shut my beak for a while now ...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:13 pm
No!!!! No!!!!!!! I be kidding only!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:14 pm
Doofus!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:15 pm
http://images.google.com.au/images?q=tbn:_tAewUPBihkC:www.oriental-japan.co.jp/image/beer/tutankhamen.jpg

http://images.google.com.au/images?q=tbn:_tAewUPBihkC:www.oriental-japan.co.jp/image/beer/tutankhamen.jpg

heehheee - holler Tut, yet?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:16 pm
Nimh has a BEAK?
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:18 pm
One's position as royalty require a forebearing attitude towards the clattering of the rabble.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:19 pm
quack quack ;-)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 07:27 pm
Hmmm - I love ducks - in a good curry!
0 Replies
 
Wy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 09:21 pm
You do not.
0 Replies
 
Mr Stillwater
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Dec, 2003 10:18 pm
Mr Stillwater wrote:
You leave my HunnyBuns alone! You hear me!!


Are you all FCUKING DEAF, OR WOT!!!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2003 12:26 am
Thank you, darling.....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/28/2025 at 09:15:48