1
   

O'Reilly Encourages Terrorist Attack on San Francisco

 
 
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 09:58 pm
Quote:
Talk host's towering rant: S.F. not worth saving

Joe Garofoli, Chronicle Staff Writer

Friday, November 11, 2005


Conservative talk-show host Bill O'Reilly is ready to scratch San Francisco off the map of the United States. Gone. Coit Tower? Terrorists can blow it up, and the rest of the country shouldn't care.

The Fox News talk-show host and one-man conservative media juggernaut has concluded that the United States and San Francisco just don't go together anymore. Voting to oppose military recruitment in public schools and to ban handgun ownership, as San Franciscans did Tuesday, means the city should be cut off from federal dollars. And then some.

"You know, if I'm the president of the United States, I walk right into Union Square, I set up my little presidential podium and I say, 'Listen, citizens of San Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to get another nickel in federal funds,' " O'Reilly said Tuesday on his radio show as San Franciscans were approving the two measures. Perhaps, he didn't realize that he'd be speaking mostly to foreign tourists and suburbanites if he were standing in Union Square.

"Fine. You want to be your own country? Go right ahead," O'Reilly went on. "And if al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead."

San Franciscans might be offended by this invitation, or perhaps even threatened, if more of them visited Coit Tower.

On a cool gray Thursday afternoon, the San Francisco landmark was filled, as usual, with tourists from Ohio, Texas and other states where TV's "The O'Reilly Factor" and its syndicated radio companion, "The Radio Factor," pull better ratings than in San Francisco.

When visitors were told of O'Reilly's remarks, several had the same question: "Why would he say that?"

The few locals found at the tower had another: "Who's Bill O'Reilly again?"

Those familiar with O'Reilly tried to put the comment in context.

"The man is a sensationalist fool," said Paul Hickey, a 76-year-old visiting from Texas.

"He's irritating," said his wife, Judy Hickey, 67.

Others interpreted the remark as O'Reilly's trademark brand of hyperbole. His mastery of this form of entertainment has made him a best-selling author and top-rated talk-show host.

"I just think he's blowing wind," said Jim Adelman, 64, visiting from Ohio.

Reaction came swiftly from City Hall, which has taken other arrows in the aftermath of Tuesday's election. Thursday on KNEW-AM -- O'Reilly's Bay Area radio home -- conservative talk-show host Jeff Katz ripped handgun-measure supporters on San Francisco's "Board of Stupidadvisors."

Board of, uh, Supervisors President Aaron Peskin, whose district includes Coit Tower, suggested that O'Reilly should get his head examined.

"It sounds like he's on the same medication Rush Limbaugh is addicted to, and he should go see a therapist,'' Peskin said.

Mayor Gavin Newsom said, "I've never been impressed with what he's had to say, and I'm not impressed now. Consider the source. Remember, this is the guy who wanted me arrested after (San Francisco sanctioned same-sex marriages last year). He never let his opinion get in the way of the facts."

Imagine if O'Reilly had read the plaque on the front of Coit Tower, which describes its benefactor and namesake, Lillie Hitchcock Coit, as a woman "who smoked cigars and often dressed as a man to gamble in North Beach saloons."

Then again, Coit Tower fans should not feel special about being singled out. This isn't the first time O'Reilly has discussed the destruction of a famous building on the air with an aural twinkle in his eye.

In September, a couple of weeks after Hurricane Katrina damaged the Gulf Coast, O'Reilly used the natural disaster to poke fun at one of his favorite targets, the United Nations.

"Bush addressed the U.N., says he wants to be steadfast in battling terrorism," O'Reilly said on his radio show. "I'm sure all the U.N. people fell asleep. They don't really care about anything over there at all. I just wish Katrina had only hit the United Nations building, nothing else. Just flooded them out. And I wouldn't have rescued them."

After United Nations Foundation President Timothy Wirth asked O'Reilly to apologize, the talk-show host replied with an on-the-air primer on the radio biz:

"Well, apparently Tim Wirth has never listened to talk radio," O'Reilly said. "So I will speak very slowly to him. It was a jest, sir. We exaggerate on the radio.

"Wise up."

Efforts to reach O'Reilly through Fox News on Thursday were unsuccessful.

At least one liberal media watchdog group was offended by O'Reilly's Coit Tower remark. Media Matters for America President David Brock said, "He's encouraging terrorist attacks. It's over the top."

But isn't O'Reilly allowed the same type of latitude that liberals have said other entertainers should be afforded?

Shortly after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, comedian Bill Maher was criticized by White House officials for saying, "We have been the cowards lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly." Maher apologized, and his public hushing by the White House made him a favorite of Bush-bashers.

"Yes, there are people saying things like that, like Bill Maher and 'The Daily Show,' but if you look at O'Reilly, his show is presented as a 'no spin zone,' " Brock said. "People take it seriously."

Those people include Brock's group, which records every minute of O'Reilly's programs. Is that one of those entry-level jobs where you pay your dues?

"No," Brock said, "but maybe it should be."

Chronicle staff writer Rachel Gordon contributed to this report. E-mail Joe Garofoli at [email protected].
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 958 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:04 pm
Well, with your new gun-ban, good luck against any real terrorists anyway.

Every small time bank robber and mugger in the country is headed your way.

I find this truly odd. Here's a city that supposedly values diversity and individual freedoms, then attempts to take away the freedoms promised by the 2nd amendment.

I suppose though, while I cannot pack heat to protect myself from freaks and creeps, it is perfectly fine for me to walk down Market St. in leather thongs with my dick hanging out, because that is protected by the 1st amendment.
0 Replies
 
yardsale
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:08 pm
Drunk The spin stops here Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:11 pm
I see another disarmed "subject" posting here.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:13 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Well, with your new gun-ban, good luck against any real terrorists anyway.

Every small time bank robber and mugger in the country is headed your way.

I find this truly odd. Here's a city that supposedly values diversity and individual freedoms, then attempts to take away the freedoms promised by the 2nd amendment.



What is odd is that you would even try to utter the myth that the Second Amendment applies to handgun ownership. Stay the **** out, traffic is bad enough as it is.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:14 pm
cjhsa wrote:

I suppose though, while I cannot pack heat to protect myself from freaks and creeps, it is perfectly fine for me to walk down Market St. in leather thongs with my dick hanging out, because that is protected by the 1st amendment.


Hanging out???


You misspelled "slightly protruding." LOL
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:19 pm
cjhsa wrote:

I suppose though, while I cannot pack heat to protect myself from freaks and creeps, it is perfectly fine for me to walk down Market St. in leather thongs with my dick slightly protruding, because that is protected by the 1st amendment.


Assuming anyone might actually see the exposure. (San Franciscans do not normally carry magnifying glasses) I would recommend you cruise Harrison St not Market. Maybe you will get lucky and run into another guy who is not a size queen. Embarrassed Laughing Rolling Eyes :wink:
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:21 pm
Guns are guns. Attempts to categorize them for purposes of restricting them are for idiots. Ask Diane or Barbara, they hear from me regularly. Welcome D.C.'s crime rate to your obviously adopted home.

Is your bandwidth free? Where did you steal the laptop?
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:38 pm
My bandwidth is free, so is my platinum digital cable, 6 mbps! What is your point, cowboy?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:40 pm
I didn't know Comcast hooked up to shopping carts.
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 10:45 pm
Too funny! I live on Twin Peaks, almost at the summit. I am staring to wonder if your claimed location is factual, I did not know there were any homeless shelters in Silicon Valley. Where exactly do you live?
0 Replies
 
twinpeaksnikki2
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 11:03 pm
I have nothing if I don't have intuition.
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 11:15 pm
Fox News' parent News Corporation produces porn so if you feel O'Reilly is obscene that is understandable as Rupert Murdoch is obscene.
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 01:29 am
The blowhard's ratings must be suffering. His show is stale now, every now and again he needs a "look at me" moment. This is it.
0 Replies
 
RichNDanaPoint
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 06:14 pm
Bill O'Reilly's daily audience is a bunch of idiots with the attention span of a gold fish. Perhaps he and Pat Robertson should team up, might make a good comedy team.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » O'Reilly Encourages Terrorist Attack on San Francisco
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/27/2022 at 11:21:07