1
   

Can/will Bush be elected to a second term?

 
 
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2003 06:56 pm
White House Keeps Eye on Re-Election Amid War
By Ron Fournier The Associated Press
Published: Apr 10, 2003

WASHINGTON (AP) - When war ends in Iraq, President Bush will quickly shift focus to his 2004 re-election campaign and the issue that kept his father from winning a second term: a weak economy. The money, message and much of Bush's political machine are already in place.
After weeks of careful planning, the White House hopes to convert postwar political momentum into a string of successes for Bush's domestic agenda - and ammunition for re-election.

The elder Bush failed to capitalize on his popularity after Operation Desert Storm in early 1991, a mistake no Republicans want to see happen again.

"I believe the president will emerge from the war with enhanced ability to stimulate the economy," said House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., a close ally of the White House.

"And that's not only the right thing to do but, obviously, it's the element that has the most potential to have an impact between now and 2004," Blunt said.

Democrats, on the other hand, are looking forward to a shift from war to relative peace as a chance to erode Bush's high job approval ratings.

"Clearly, this president's record on domestic issues will be a major factor in the 2004 election," said Democratic Party chairman Terry McAuliffe.

Democrats point to the 2 million jobs lost since Bush took office, as well as a long drop in the Dow Jones industrial average. Republicans predict the economy will start motoring as soon as the shooting stops.

And if that doesn't work, they want Bush to get credit for trying.

While the elder Bush proposed a modest postwar domestic agenda, this Bush is talking big - starting with a $725 billion package of tax cuts.

In a rare retreat, the White House has publicly suggested it would accept less from Congress than Bush proposed, but that may be a dodge: Some advisers predict that the afterglow of war will boost Bush's popularity and help him squeeze concessions from lawmakers.

Some of his efforts are cosmetic.

Hoping to avoid the hands-off criticism that hurt his father, Bush stages frequent economic events at the White House and throughout the country. He met with supportive business leaders Thursday, then dispatched them to the front lawn to discuss his economic plan with local and national reporters.

"What the Democrats are missing in this whole thing is this president is great at getting on message and staying on message and the entire White House is perfectly happy with following the script," said GOP strategist Rich Galen.

Bush is also proposing a $400 billion overhaul of Medicare, a program once thought politically untouchable for Republicans.

In outlining his agenda nearly three months ago, Bush also promised new money for research into fuel-efficient cars - a sign that he would not cede environmental issues to Democrats.

The economy may dominate, but the war on terrorism will remain a significant issue in Bush's campaign.

"All he's got to do is remind voters that this is a dangerous age and that Democrats, at best, have a lukewarm support for the military," said GOP pollster Whit Ayres. He said the conflict in Iraq may not fade from view as quickly as Democrats would like.

Though fighting could end soon, White House officials said there is no guarantee that Bush would declare the war over. It could take months to completely secure the nation, said aides who noted that the president has never called an end to the Afghanistan war.

That could cut against Bush. Democrats have long criticized his prewar diplomatic efforts, and are now raising questions about his postwar plans.

"We must hold him to these commitments" to rebuild Iraq, Sen. John Edwards, a Democratic presidential candidate, said on the floor of the Senate on Thursday. "Because in Afghanistan the president's rhetoric about winning the peace looks more and more like an empty promise."

Bush's message will not suffer from a lack of money.

He raised more than $100 million 2001, a record he may double in the upcoming election. His fund-raising team is quietly lining up donors who can start pouring money into the campaign as soon as Bush says he's ready, probably by June.

One of his top money men, Jack Oliver, is expected to move from a top post in the Republican Party to Bush's campaign. Ken Mehlman, White House political director, will run the campaign headquarters.

Karl Rove, the president's top political and policy adviser, will oversee the operation from the White House.

Several longtime Bush associates have moved out of the administration and will be important campaign advisers, including Karen Hughes in Texas, Mindy Tucker in California and Joe Allbaugh in Washington.

Their job will be to cast Bush as a leader who tackles tough issues, both at home and abroad. It is a message designed to link Bush's command of a winning military to his work on an ailing economy - a fusion of politics, policy and war.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 733 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Violet Lake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Apr, 2003 07:12 pm
The Last Refuge
By PAUL KRUGMAN

In 1944, millions of Americans were engaged in desperate battles across the world. Nonetheless, a normal presidential election was held, and the opposition didn't pull its punches: Thomas Dewey, the Republican candidate, campaigned on the theme that Franklin Roosevelt was a "tired old man." As far as I've been able to ascertain, the Roosevelt administration didn't accuse Dewey of hurting morale by questioning the president's competence. After all, democracy -- including the right to criticize -- was what we were fighting for.

It's not a slur on the courage of our troops, or a belittling of the risks they face, to say that our current war is a mere skirmish by comparison. Yet self-styled patriots are trying to impose constraints on political speech never contemplated during World War II, accusing anyone who criticizes the president of undermining the war effort.

Last week John Kerry told an audience that "what we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States." Republicans immediately sought to portray this remark as little short of treason. "Senator Kerry crossed a grave line when he dared to suggest the replacement of America's commander in chief at a time when America is at war," declared Marc Racicot, chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Notice that Mr. Racicot wasn't criticizing Mr. Kerry's choice of words. Instead, he denounced Mr. Kerry because he "dared to suggest the replacement of America's commander in chief" -- knowing full well that Mr. Kerry was simply talking about the next election. Mr. Racicot, not Mr. Kerry, is the one who crossed a grave line; never in our nation's history has it been considered unpatriotic to oppose an incumbent's re-election.

Anyway, what defines patriotism? Talk is cheap; so is putting a flag in your lapel. Citizens prove their patriotism when they make sacrifices for the sake of their country. Mr. Kerry, a decorated veteran, has met that test. Most of his critics haven't.

I'm not just talking about military service -- though it's striking how few of our biggest hawks have served. Nor am I talking only about financial sacrifice -- though profiting from public office seems to be the norm, not the exception, among those who wrap themselves in the flag. (Mr. Racicot himself accepted the job as R.N.C. chairman only on the condition that he remain on the payroll of Bracewell and Patterson, a law firm that specializes in lobbying.)

The biggest test of a politician's patriotism is whether he is willing to sacrifice some of his political agenda for the sake of the nation. And that's a test our current leaders have failed with flying colors.

Consider the case of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, who also piled on Mr. Kerry last week. As it happens, during the war in Kosovo Mr. DeLay was a defeatist, and blamed his own country for provoking Serbian atrocities; any Democrat who said similar things now would be accused of giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

Mr. DeLay's political agenda hasn't shifted a bit now that we're at war again. He's still pushing for huge, divisive tax cuts that go mainly to the rich: "Nothing is more important in the face of a war than cutting taxes," he says. And he's still eager to slash any and all domestic spending. In the midst of war he pushed through a budget that included sharp cuts in, yes, veterans' benefits.

You can see why Mr. Kerry blasted back, "I'm not going to be questioned in my patriotism by the likes of Tom DeLay."

Some timid souls will suggest that critics of the Bush administration hold off until the war is over. But that's not the American tradition -- and anyway, when will this war be over? Baghdad will fall, but during the occupation that follows American soldiers will still be in harm's way. Also, a strong faction within the administration wants to go on to Syria, to Iran and beyond. And Al Qaeda is still out there.

For years to come, then, this country may be, in some sense, at war. And all that time, if Mr. Racicot and his party are allowed to set the ground rules, nobody will be allowed to criticize the president or call for his electoral defeat. You know what? If that happens, we will have lost the war, whatever happens on the battlefield.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/08/opinion/08KRUG.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Can/will Bush be elected to a second term?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 07:41:19