Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 12:56 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:

If you were British, or even French, you might be able to take comfort in the fact that your ancestors (in the aggregate) wielded a mighty influence on world affairs. But, alas, you are German. Individually, Germans have made incredible contributions to human society but when it comes to the Germans as a whole, the issue is less certain.
.


Indeed, my ancestors made now contribution at all to world history.

Locally, one of my great-great .... granfathers was honorably mention (as Monsieur Hinteler) when getting back the city of Muenster out of the hands of some "enemies". And in science, a greatuncle found something - in early 20th century quite important - about the absorptions of vapours through charcoal ("Schmidt-Hinteler-effect").

But as you correctly said, this issue is less certain than that of the "Finn d'Abuzz's".


Bravo for the Family Hinteler!

And, I am sure, that there was never a Hinteler who was a member of the Nazi Party.

Even post-modernists find it difficult to refute that the Third Reich was truly evil, and the Third Reich would never have been possible without the aggregated approval of the German people.

The horrors of the Third Reich are not common to the human experience, and therefore it is a quite legitimate question to ask: "How did the German people allow these horrors?"

Germans, at least initially (i.e. Krystalnacht), are not able to assert that they were forced into behaviors they would normally shun because of the threat of a dictatorial power.

Without a doubt, there have been Germans of intellectual, creative and humanitarian genius, and one might argue that their contribution to this rare breed is even disproportionate to their population, but in our reckoning has their been a more evil nation? Nation = Germany = Germans.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 01:06 am
No, Francis, I am not bothered by foreigners knowing about our History, Geography or Sociology. I am, indeed, flattered. What you have apparently missed is the point that, while we indeed have some retarded persons in our house, it is not good manners for anyone to restrict their comments only to them.

It would also not be good manners on my part if I proceeded to point out History which would lead some posters to come to negative conclusions about the great country of France--Such as:

l. We spilt our blood twice in Europe in World War I and II, and in the process, helped to liberate France twice.

2. We poured Billions into Europe with the Marshall plan. It was, of course, not pure altruism but no one can deny it helped France to recover economically.

It would seem that good deeds never go unpunished.


All that I am asking is that commentators who do not live in our country and cannot possibly know the Zeitgeist here among its citizens, try to make some positive remarks once in a while. To limit all posts to negatives will surely class foreign critiques as nothing but common scolds.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 01:22 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
[The horrors of the Third Reich are not common to the human experience, and therefore it is a quite legitimate question to ask: "How did the German people allow these horrors?"

Germans, at least initially (i.e. Krystalnacht), are not able to assert that they were forced into behaviors they would normally shun because of the threat of a dictatorial power.
.


Perhaps you should read a bit about the Third Punic War; the Goth invasions of the Roman Empire; the suppression of the Albagensian heresy in France; the treatment of cities that resisted them by the Monguls; the behavior of the Portuguese explorers in creating their South asian Empire; the French treatment of Hugenots; the English extermination of the Catholic clergy; the Spanish expulsion of the Jews and Moriscos; the extermination of the Eastern native Indians by the American pilgrim fathers (and later in a more organized fashion by our pioneers on the plains); the enslavement of hundreds of thousands of Africans by Arabs, Europeans (but interestingly, not Germans) and Americans; the Wars of independence and civil wars in Mexico and the Andean region of South America; the "Elimination of the Irreconcilables" by marxist Dictators in Russia, Chuna, and even absurd little Cuba. This is just an incomplete list of events that quickly come to mind. All were relatively, and some absolutely, as horrific and murderous as the Holocaust.

You are betraying a truly remarkable ignorance of history and a profound lack of understanding of human nature.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 01:37 am
georgeob1 wrote:
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
[The horrors of the Third Reich are not common to the human experience, and therefore it is a quite legitimate question to ask: "How did the German people allow these horrors?"

Germans, at least initially (i.e. Krystalnacht), are not able to assert that they were forced into behaviors they would normally shun because of the threat of a dictatorial power.
.


Perhaps you should read a bit about the Third Punic War; the Goth invasions of the Roman Empire; the suppression of the Albagensian heresy in France; the treatment of cities that resisted them by the Monguls; the behavior of the Portuguese explorers in creating their South asian Empire; the French treatment of Hugenots; the English extermination of the Catholic clergy; the Spanish expulsion of the Jews and Moriscos; the extermination of the Eastern native Indians by the American pilgrim fathers (and later in a more organized fashion by our pioneers on the plains); the enslavement of hundreds of thousands of Africans by Arabs, Europeans (but interestingly, not Germans) and Americans; the Wars of independence and civil wars in Mexico and the Andean region of South America; the "Elimination of the Irreconcilables" by marxist Dictators in Russia, Chuna, and even absurd little Cuba. This is just an incomplete list of events that quickly come to mind. All were relatively, and some absolutely, as horrific and murderous as the Holocaust.

You are betraying a truly remarkable ignorance of history and a profound lack of understanding of human nature.


You've already established that you are a Rightie whom Setanta, Walter and Blatham might find reasonable. No need to repeat yourself ad nauseum.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 01:41 am
As usual, you certainly have a good command of History, GeorgeOb1.

I have heard some people say that Stalin's exterminations placed him at the head of the class in that category.

If you were to rank, what I am sure you rightly call "horrific and murderous" events paralleling the "holocaust" how far down your list would the "holocaust" appear?

I have not read of the events you so eruditely list for quite a while and must confess that my visits to "holocaust" centers in the past two or three years may have affected my historical perspective.

So, given your study of "human nature" just where would you rank the "holocaust"?

I have not read as deeply as you have in this field, but I think I can say without fear of contradiction, that the "holocaust"( however, it is ranked) was absolutely the peak of "Germanic efficiency".
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 02:05 am
BernardR wrote:
No, Francis, I am not bothered by foreigners knowing about our History, Geography or Sociology. I am, indeed, flattered. What you have apparently missed is the point that, while we indeed have some retarded persons in our house, it is not good manners for anyone to restrict their comments only to them.

It would also not be good manners on my part if I proceeded to point out History which would lead some posters to come to negative conclusions about the great country of France--Such as:

l. We spilt our blood twice in Europe in World War I and II, and in the process, helped to liberate France twice.

2. We poured Billions into Europe with the Marshall plan. It was, of course, not pure altruism but no one can deny it helped France to recover economically.

It would seem that good deeds never go unpunished.


All that I am asking is that commentators who do not live in our country and cannot possibly know the Zeitgeist here among its citizens, try to make some positive remarks once in a while. To limit all posts to negatives will surely class foreign critiques as nothing but common scolds.


It seems that, in your oriented way of thinking, you CANNOT acknowledge the fact that I, as a person, am grateful for what Americans did on those special occasions...

Calling that a scold really puzzles me...
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 02:21 am
I am delighted that you, Francis, are greatful. I do hope that the esteemed Walter Hinteler is greatful too. Please do not think that I am saying that there should never be a negative critique of the US. its administration, culture, school systems, etc. All I am saying is that negative comments from those who do not live in our country should be balanced with positive ones.

You can, I am sure you know, find issues in the USA which call for praise and some which call for negative criticism.

All I am respectfully suggesting is that there be some balance.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 04:52 am
BernardR wrote:
I am delighted that you, Francis, are greatful. I do hope that the esteemed Walter Hinteler is greatful too.


Maybe you do think I am great but do you mind noting that I'm only grateful. Walter may be delighted too...

Unlike those of Walter, my corrections are gratuitous...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 06:33 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
And, I am sure, that there was never a Hinteler who was a member of the Nazi Party.

Correct.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Even post-modernists find it difficult to refute that the Third Reich was truly evil, and the Third Reich would never have been possible without the aggregated approval of the German people.

The horrors of the Third Reich are not common to the human experience, and therefore it is a quite legitimate question to ask: "How did the German people allow these horrors?"

Correct as well.

And, honestly, since I've been able to get what happened there, I'd never found a satisfactorily answer to that question.

Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Germans, at least initially (i.e. Krystalnacht), are not able to assert that they were forced into behaviors they would normally shun because of the threat of a dictatorial power.

Your term sounds very "nice", IMHO. It wasn/t at all like just distroying some glass - as this word from the Nazi-terminology might indicate - it was far, far worse: a progrom, as it is called correctly.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 06:34 am
George: thanks for your comments, but "no", I actually wrote what I think.
(And after these couple of days here in a couple of various places in different states, I'm really pleased that only a very few of US citizens are so narrow-minded as some here on this thread.
That's what I expected.)
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 May, 2006 06:39 am
Francis: :wink:
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 03:53 am
How many people did you meet, Mr. Hinteler? Are you sure when you say "Narrow minded" you don't really mean "people who don't agree with me"?


For all of our "narrow-mindedness" it is Germans who beg to be let into our great universities.

You are aware, I hope, Mr. Hinteler, that in any listing of top Universities of the world, the German Universities, which, of course, contain no "narrow-minded "students or teachers, shows that only five German Universities are listed. The first German University listed in the list of 100 is in 51st Place--the University of Munich, while nearly half of the 100 Universities are Universities in the USA( 46 to be precise).

Could it be that the charge of "narrow-mindedness" comes from a country
that can't hold a candle to the brilliance and productivity displayed inUS Universities.

It may well be that the German Universities suffer from the lack of a most important element. We, in the US do not have that problem.

We have a very large percentage of Professors who are Jewish.

I assure you they are fine teachers and have been instrumental in building our Universities so that they are the best in the world.

And, as far as I have been able to discern, none of them are "narrow- minded"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

source for University list


http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2005/ARWU2005_Top100.htm
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 06:41 am
You posted that list already a couple of times under your previous member names.

Would you mind starting a thread about your problems with whatever you've against foreigners, Germans, French, Europeans etc?

Or carry giving some new evidence re the topic of this thread.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 12:51 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
George: thanks for your comments, but "no", I actually wrote what I think.
(And after these couple of days here in a couple of various places in different states, I'm really pleased that only a very few of US citizens are so narrow-minded as some here on this thread.
That's what I expected.)


Well, as you have already pointed out to me, most of the Americans you meet are of German descent. Wait until you meet an Irishman !
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 01:00 pm
What are you talking about, George?

You mean the Irishmen are even worse that some people we find on this thread?

Can't believe that!!!

(The Irish I met were nice people...)
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 01:19 pm
Francis, you are correct - I was dead wrong. The Irish here are all particularly intelligent, cheerful, open-minded and good-looking. They generally rise above the sectarian personal bashing that so infects these threads. I can say this with some considerable authority.

Wait until Walter meets an Anglo Saxon !
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 01:36 pm
BernardR,

Some of the points you make have real merit, but the contexts and arguments in which you imbed them are often so wrong-headed and offensive that whatever merit there may be in some aspects of your evaluation is utterly lost on a discerning reader.

This is a dialogue about events and ideas. it is not a contest with winners and losers. None of us is personally responsible for the achievements or failings of the nation he inhabiits, its history or future prospects. We are like passengers on different ships, comparing notes on their different features and attempting to find valid general principles for others. We each have a point of view embedded in our different circumstances and shaped by our iindividual interpretations. The best we can do is to attempt to improve our understanding through dialogue and reasoned disagreement about external factors. Invective and personal attacks - particularly the unjustifiable application of flawed stereotypes to individuals - benefit no one and, instead degrade the process for everyone. Give it up.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 02:28 pm
great post georgeob1. Just goes to show you, when you give BernardR enough rope, he'll hang himself.

Well actually he did already.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 02:34 pm
After your vibrant advocacy of fairness, George, I think you may be Irish :wink:
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 02:38 pm
BernardR wrote:
How many people did you meet, Mr. Hinteler? Are you sure when you say "Narrow minded" you don't really mean "people who don't agree with me"?


For all of our "narrow-mindedness" it is Germans who beg to be let into our great universities.

You are aware, I hope, Mr. Hinteler, that in any listing of top Universities of the world, the German Universities, which, of course, contain no "narrow-minded "students or teachers, shows that only five German Universities are listed. The first German University listed in the list of 100 is in 51st Place--the University of Munich, while nearly half of the 100 Universities are Universities in the USA( 46 to be precise).

Could it be that the charge of "narrow-mindedness" comes from a country
that can't hold a candle to the brilliance and productivity displayed inUS Universities.

It may well be that the German Universities suffer from the lack of a most important element. We, in the US do not have that problem.

We have a very large percentage of Professors who are Jewish.

I assure you they are fine teachers and have been instrumental in building our Universities so that they are the best in the world.

And, as far as I have been able to discern, none of them are "narrow- minded"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

source for University list


http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2005/ARWU2005_Top100.htm


What you fail to recognize is that only a small percentage of Americans
can afford to visit top ranking universities. The majority of Americans
start with junior colleges and transfer then to either a state or private
college, because of the exorbitant cost of education.

In Germany, education is free, and per capita there are more university educated Germans than in the United States.

So, you see, having top ranking universities doesn't mean a thing,
if only 5 % of the population is able to attend.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Riots in France
  3. » Page 29
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 02:31:48