1
   

Inquiry on Lobbyist Abramoff Widens to Senior Officials

 
 
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2005 06:19 pm
Inquiry on Lobbyist Widens to Senior Officials; Senate Hearing Is Today
By Philip Shenon
The New York Times
Wednesday 02 November 2005
Washington

Investigators have expanded their inquiries into the activities of the lobbyist Jack Abramoff to include his efforts to pressure Interior Secretary Gale A. Norton and other senior Interior Department officials on behalf of Indian tribes with gambling interests, lawyers involved in the investigations said in interviews this week.

Although Ms. Norton is not reported to be a focus of the inquiries, the lawyers said investigators from the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, the Justice Department and the inspector general of the Interior Department had raised questions about actions of her former deputy and the president of a lobbying group that Ms. Norton helped found.

The chairman of the Senate panel, John McCain, Republican of Arizona, has scheduled a hearing on the investigation for Wednesday, the last of a series looking into the lobbying activities of Mr. Abramoff and his former partner, Michael Scanlon.

Mr. Abramoff, once among the most powerful lobbyists in the capital and a close friend of Representative Tom DeLay, Republican of Texas, has been under investigation for more than a year by a federal grand jury here. Mr. Scanlon is Mr. DeLay's former press secretary in the House.

Mr. McCain has focused on whether Mr. Abramoff and Mr. Scanlon defrauded tribes that paid them more than $80 million in lobbying fees.

The House ethics committee has signaled that it intends to conduct a separate inquiry into the ties between Mr. Abramoff and Mr. DeLay, including several luxurious overseas trips that the lobbyist arranged for Mr. DeLay, who has stepped down at least temporarily as House majority leader as a result of an unrelated money-laundering indictment in Texas.

The Senate hearing on Wednesday is expected to examine Mr. Abramoff's use of a lobbying group closely associated with Ms. Norton to try to pressure Interior Department officials, including Ms. Norton and her former deputy, J. Steven Griles, to take steps that would benefit his Indian clients' gambling operations. The Interior Department is the parent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The Senate hearing will focus on Mr. Abramoff's work on behalf of the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana, which paid him more than $6 million in lobbying fees, much of it for a campaign to urge the Interior Department to reject a proposal by a rival Louisiana tribe, the Jena Choctaws, to open its own casino.

The chief spokesman for the department, Dan DuBray, said Ms. Norton had never done any special favors for Mr. Abramoff or his clients and had in fact acted against his interests by allowing the Jenas to take the first steps toward opening a casino.

"Ultimately," Mr. DuBray said, "the decisions did not benefit the clients of Mr. Abramoff."

Among the witnesses being called to testify are Mr. Griles and Italia Federici, president of the Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy, the lobbying group that Ms. Norton helped create in the 1990's. The council describes itself as a group committed to protection of natural resources. Major environmental groups describe it as a front for the mining and chemical industries.

Interior Department officials say Ms. Federici repeatedly contacted department officials, including Ms. Norton and Mr. Griles, on behalf of Mr. Abramoff's Indian clients, even though her organization had no obvious interest in Indian gambling. About that time, the advocacy council received hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations from some of the tribes.

In an interview this year with The Rocky Mountain News in Denver, Ms. Federici, who worked on Ms. Norton's failed Senate bid in 1996, described her as a mentor. Ms. Federici was quoted as saying that although she had never lobbied for Mr. Abramoff, he was a supporter who "interacted with lots of different groups and organizations, and ours was just one of them."

Ms. Federici's lawyer, Michael G. Scheininger, said that although his client was on the witness list for the hearing, she would not testify because of a scheduling conflict. Mr. Scheininger said that she was interviewed this month in detail in a deposition with the committee and that she had been in contact with the Justice Department as part of its investigation, but that she was "absolutely not" in any trouble with prosecutors.

A spokesman for Mr. McCain had no comment about whether his committee intended to force Ms. Federici to appear before it.

A lawyer for Mr. Griles, Barry M. Hartman, would not discuss details of his client's testimony on Wednesday. Mr. Hartman said Mr. Griles would "try to answer whatever questions he's being asked as best he can."

The lawyer added that there was nothing improper in Mr. Griles's contacts with Mr. Abramoff or in Mr. Griles's involvement with Indian gambling while he worked at the Interior Department.

The hearing on Wednesday is also expected to produce new scrutiny of Mr. Scanlon, who refused to testify last year before the Indian Affairs Committee. A former deputy in his public relations firm, Capitol Campaign Strategies, has been called as a witness, as has Mr. Abramoff's former tax adviser.

Mr. Scanlon's lawyer has declined to comment on the investigation or say whether Mr. Scanlon is cooperating with the Justice Department. A spokesman for Mr. Abramoff had no comment on the Senate hearing.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 517 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Mapleleaf
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Nov, 2005 10:09 pm
How are you doing Bumble? Do you have a sense of how far this will go?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Nov, 2005 07:37 am
AP: DeLay's staff tried to help Abramoff

By JOHN SOLOMON AND SHARON THEIMER
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITERS

the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook, Files)
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Tom DeLay's staff tried to help lobbyist Jack Abramoff win access to Interior Secretary Gale Norton, an effort that succeeded after Abramoff's Indian tribe clients began funneling a quarter-million dollars to an environmental group founded by Norton.

"Do you think you could call that friend and set up a meeting," then-DeLay staffer Tony Rudy wrote to fellow House aide Thomas Pyle in a Dec. 29, 2000, e-mail titled "Gale Norton-Interior Secretary." President Bush had nominated Norton to the post the day before.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1110AP_DeLay_Indian_Tribes.html
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Nov, 2005 09:04 am
Mapleleaf
Mapleleaf wrote:
How are you doing Bumble? Do you have a sense of how far this will go?


I have no idea, but it appears that Abrahoff's corruption reached deeply into the Bush administration and the Congress.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Nov, 2005 09:16 am
Read also:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=53093&highlight=abramoff
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Nov, 2005 07:42 pm
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Nov, 2005 07:46 pm
House Speaker Hastert Caught In Lobbyist Abramoff's scandal
House Speaker Rep. Dennis Hastert Caught In Lobbyist Abramoff's Scandal?
November 5, 2005 05:28 PM
AP/Susan Walsh

In June 2003, House Speaker Dennis Hastert sent a letter to Secretary of the Interior Gale Norton urging her to act in favor of clients of the scandal-plagued lobbyist Jack Abramoff. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported yesterday that investigators believe that Abramoff and his staff provided the congressmen with the letter's text.

Three other representatives, including former House Majority leader Tom DeLay and the current majority leader Roy Blunt, co-signed the letter. Both DeLay and Blunt have close ties to Abramoff and have received thousands of dollars from his clients.

The letter endorsed a view of gambling law that would block the Jena Band of Choctaw Indians from opening a casino nearby one owned by the Coushattas, an Abramoff client.

In September 2004, the Washington Post quoted V. Heather Sibbison, a lobbyist at the time for the Jena Band: "I have never seen a letter like that before. It was incredibly unusual for that group of people, who do not normally weigh in on Indian issues, to express such a strong opinion about a particular project not in any of their home states."

Accoring to FEC reports, since 1999 Hastert has taken $49,000 from American Indian tribes while they were Jack Abramoff's clients. On June 3, 2003, Hasteret held a fundraiser at Signatures, a Washington restaurant owned by Abramoff. He did not pay for the space until more than two years later, when Business Week began an in-depth investigation into use of Signatures.

Developing...
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Nov, 2005 08:08 pm
DeLay Asked Lobbyist to Raise Money Through Charity
November 4, 2005
DeLay Asked Lobbyist to Raise Money Through Charity
By PHILIP SHENON
New York Times
WASHINGTON

Representative Tom DeLay asked the lobbyist Jack Abramoff to raise money for him through a private charity controlled by Mr. Abramoff, an unusual request that led the lobbyist to try to gather at least $150,000 from his Indian tribe clients and their gambling operations, according to newly disclosed e-mail from the lobbyist's files.

The electronic messages from 2002, which refer to "Tom" and "Tom's requests," appear to be the clearest evidence to date of an effort by Mr. DeLay, a Texas Republican, to pressure Mr. Abramoff and his lobbying partners to raise money for him. The e-mail messages do not specify why Mr. DeLay wanted the money, how it was to be used or why he would want money raised through the auspices of a private charity.

"Did you get the message from the guys that Tom wants us to raise some bucks from Capital Athletic Foundation?" Mr. Abramoff asked a colleague in a message on June 6, 2002, referring to the charity. "I have six clients in for $25K. I recommend we hit everyone who cares about Tom's requests. I have another few to hit still."

The e-mail was addressed to Tony Rudy, who had been Mr. DeLay's chief of staff in the House before joining Mr. Abramoff's lobbying firm. Mr. Abramoff said it would be good "if we can do $200K" for Mr. DeLay.

The e-mail traffic was released this week by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, which has conducted a yearlong investigation into whether Mr. Abramoff and a business partner, Michael Scanlon, Mr. DeLay's former House press secretary, defrauded Indian tribe clients and their gambling operations out of tens of millions of dollars. There was no immediate comment on the e-mail from spokesmen for Mr. Abramoff or Mr. DeLay, who has stepped down as House majority leader because of an unrelated criminal indictment in his home state.

The Justice Department signaled last month that it was investigating the propriety of Mr. DeLay's ties to Mr. Abramoff, including trips that the lobbyist organized for Mr. DeLay and his wife. Mr. Abramoff is under indictment in a separate federal fraud investigation in Florida.

The case against Mr. DeLay in Texas, which centers on charges that he violated the state's century-old ban on use of corporate money in its political races, has been thrown into confusion this week because of accusations - first by Mr. DeLay's defense lawyers, then by prosecutors - that judges assigned to the case cannot be impartial because of their political ties, a concern in Texas because judges there are elected.

On Tuesday, Mr. DeLay's lawyers managed to have the trial judge, Bob Perkins, a Democrat, removed because he had made contributions to the Democratic Party and its candidates. On Thursday, the Republican administrative judge who was supposed to pick Judge Perkins's replacement, B. B. Schraub, removed himself from the case because of contributions he had made to Republican candidates.

Judge Schraub immediately forwarded the case to the state's chief justice, Wallace B. Jefferson, another Republican. But Justice Jefferson's involvement was also challenged by the prosecutors. They suggested in a separate court filing that the chief justice could not be impartial because of his use of a political consultant and campaign treasurer who had also worked for Texans for a Republican Majority, Mr. DeLay's state political action committee, and because he had received thousands of dollars in donations from the Republican Party.

Late Thursday, Justice Jefferson announced that he had named a new trial judge, Pat Priest, a retired Democratic judge from San Antonio. It was not immediately clear if Judge Priest would be acceptable to lawyers on both sides.

The focus on Mr. DeLay back in Washington has been over his ties to Mr. Abramoff, once one of the city's most powerful lobbyists and Republican fund-raisers, and Mr. Scanlon, who was among Mr. DeLay's closest aides on his House staff.

The hearings by the Senate Indian Affairs Committee have shown that through a network of outside companies and charities, Mr. Abramoff and Mr. Scanlon funneled tens of millions of dollars in lobbying fees from Indian tribes into activities that often had little connection to the interests of the tribes and their lucrative gambling operations.

Mr. Abramoff's private charity, the Capital Athletic Foundation, has come under scrutiny by Senate investigators since the foundation was used to underwrite overseas travel by members of Congress and senior government officials, as well as a Jewish day school that Mr. Abramoff had established and paramilitary training for kibbutz residents in Israel. Mr. Abramoff's e-mail messages describe the training program as a "sniper school."

In a chain of often cryptic e-mail messages that began on June 6, 2002, Mr. Abramoff communicated with members of his lobbying firm and his clients about Mr. DeLay's request that large amounts of money be raised through the foundation.

"Hi Tony," Mr. Abramoff wrote to Mr. Rudy, asking that he help in the fund-raising effort and describing the Capital Athletic Foundation as "a tax deductible foundation" that does "NO lobbying at all."

Later that day, Mr. Abramoff wrote to Mr. Rudy again, asking him to pass on the request for a donation to one of the firm's major Indian tribe clients, the Saginaw Chippewas of Michigan. He wrote that the request would "look better coming from you as a former DeLay COS - we're gonna make a bundle here."

On June 20, Mr. Rudy wrote to Todd Boulanger, a different colleague at the lobbying firm Greenberg Traurig, asking about the status of a $25,000 contribution to the Capital Athletic Foundation.

"Jack wants this," Mr. Rudy wrote, referring to Mr. Abramoff. "It is something our friends are raising money for." The e-mail did not identify the friends.

Mr. Boulanger replied the same day: "I'm sensing shadiness. I'll stop asking. I'll break it up over the various request to a total of $25K."

Mr. Rudy replied: "Your senses are good. If you have to say Leadership is asking, please do. I already have." Mr. Rudy did not return phone calls Thursday, so it was not possible to determine if "Leadership" referred to Mr. DeLay.

In e-mail on July 8, 2002, to the lobbyist for a Texas Indian tribe, Mr. Abramoff asked about the status of the tribe's contribution to the foundation for Mr. DeLay: "I am getting daily calls on this. When they return tomorrow, I have no doubt, Tom himself is going to call." Mr. Abramoff appeared to be referring to Mr. DeLay's return to Washington after the Fourth of July holiday.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Inquiry on Lobbyist Abramoff Widens to Senior Officials
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 05:13:14