Glad we got the 'descent' issue cleared up; I should have included the explanation in my original post, but y'all figured it out just fine.
Quote:"I'm gonna be picky as hell.
Mike Alstott is white, still playing, and he played tailback in the NFL, (or whatever you want to call it when you have only one running back to run the ball, which is most of the time).
When he was in the same backfield as the faster Warrick Dunn, who is black, Alstott switched to fullback or blocking back. But very frequently, Alstott was THE running back, and he had some good years in that position.
Craig James, white, played tailback, not blocking back, for several years for New England within that 20 year limit.
However, I'm not sure if there is anyone else on that list of white people who were in the backfield to actually run the ball, not to block for the black running back and carry the ball only once or twice a game to cross up the defense.
PS: Franco Harris was half African-American, half Italian. Although it is still unfortunately customary to call a half-black, half-white person black, (because the blackness was seen as "polluting" the whiteness), as a white person I hereby claim Franco Harris as white running back.
We need the help. "
Nice call, kelticwiz, but you kind of made my point. Your 'white' running back, Franco Harris (quite an immaculate reception, wasn't it?), retired over 20 years ago. Mike Alstott
is a fullback; I don't think his 40 time would beat most high school tailback recruit's time, he runs with power and agility, but not speed. As to Craig James....Who? You might have got me on that one.
So we seem to be going somewhat back and forth on whether or not the speed advantage of black athletes is genetic or not; yet everyone seems to be sidestepping the main issue I brought forth about the coach's statement. Should he be beat up by the media like he has been?
A local sports writer (white) compared the Air Force coach to Jimmy the Greek; if anyone recalls Jimmy's stupid remark on live TV, he stated that blacks were genetically superior to whites athletically because of breeding programs instilled by slave owners. He said slave owners would "breed big bucks" to large black women, with the result eventually being superior black athletes today. Jimmy was correctly and collectively dismissed as a racist knucklehead; but the Air Force coach did not even come close to saying anything as offensive, and I believe it was very unfair of the sports writer to make the comparison.
Merry Andrew stated
Quote:"The political problem here is that Coach didn't know when it's wiser to keep your mouth shut. The point is this: whether what he said is true or not, is immaterial; it is still stereotyping. It is not useful to allege that members one race are, somehow. better (or worse) at a given task than members of any other race. It makes it look as though blacks are, after all, somehow "different" from whites. The problem isn't with what the coach said; it's that he said it at all. Discretion is the better part...etc. "
.
In today's world, you are probably right, MA. But why? Why has society become so gun-shy when it comes to race? I believe ignoring
all things[/u] racial is somewhat racist in itself, isn't it?
I think my local sportswriter pal and other white critics are being condescending with black folk; they seem to falling all over each other in trying to out-do each other in being politically correct. Far from being simply white guilt, these people are trying to position themselves as being the white avenger for black people everywhere, and I think it is pathetic.
People are different. All of us bring different strengths and weaknesses to the table, yet when it comes to race, we must tiptoe around as if we are all factory made and identical.
Confront racism when it rears its ugly head. But jumping on issues like this makes one look simply silly. Michael Wilbon, a sports writer for the Washington Post, had a pretty good take on this; Here is the link:
Fury over racism misguided