1
   

Guaranteed: Miers to withdraw

 
 
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2005 09:08 am
by Joseph Farah
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Harriet Miers is never going to be grilled by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

She is going to withdraw her name from consideration before such hearings ever begin.

You can take that to the bank.


Why? Because, even though Democrats in the Senate seem more pleased with the choice of Miers than do Republicans, the questions that must be asked of the nominee for Sandra Day O'Connor's Supreme Court seat would be among the most embarrassing ever raised about her boss, President Bush.

Most of the attention on the nomination so far has focused on her lack of experience, her track record, her opinions on abortion, etc.

But the silver bullet that will do in the nominee is her cozy relationship with Bush - one that likely placed her in a position of covering up scandals in the Texas Lottery to keep secret the preferential treatment the president received as a young man to enter the Texas Air National Guard.

All it will take is a subpoena or two to get the whole sordid story on the public record - in front of a national television audience.

I don't think George W. Bush, already experiencing unfavorable public opinion ratings, will allow that to happen.

Democratic senators will overcome their apparent enthusiasm for the Miers pick when they realize they have an opportunity to embarrass Bush over the way he avoided Vietnam service.

All they would have to do is to subpoena two witnesses - former Texas Lt. Gov. Ben Barnes and former Texas Lottery director Lawrence Littwin.

It was Barnes, also a former House speaker in the state, who testified under oath in 1999 in a lawsuit brought by Littwin that he called the head of the Texas Air National Guard to put in a good word for Bush. Barnes later parlayed that favor into multimillion-dollar leverage as a lobbyist-consultant with a company called GTECH that won the business of running the scandal-plagued Texas Lottery.

After Littwin was hired by the Texas Lottery Commission, he made the unfortunate decision of questioning why GTECH should get Texas' business without facing competitive bids. He also questioned why the company should be paying former state officials like Barnes and contributing money, perhaps illegally, to other Texas politicians.

As a result, the commission headed by Miers fired Littwin. GTECH paid him off with a $300,000 settlement and bought out Barnes' contract for $23 million. The unusual settlement required Littwin to destroy all of his lawsuit documents, and Harriet Miers, the chairman of the Lottery Commission and future White House counsel and Supreme Court nominee, avoided testifying as to her knowledge of the whole sordid affair.

Does anyone really expect President Bush will allow this can o' worms to be reopened in Senate hearings?

No way!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 591 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2005 09:09 am
Not my opinion. Just posting an opinion Bushie is up against.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2005 09:22 am
By the ultra-conservative World Net Daily, no less!

This is an amazing rip. For not only is this conservative website, so often quoted by conservatives on Abuzz, ripping Miers, it's ripping Bush himself. It portrays him as a total sleaze. I have to admit, I didn't expect this.
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2005 09:57 am
Drudge is also reporting that Miers testified in 1990 that she wouldn't join the Federalist Society because it was too "politically charged". All in all, not a bad position for a conservative stealth candidate, however, then she went on to admit that she had joined the liberal Democratic Progressive Voters League (but said shes not active). When asked if she considered the NAACP to be "polictically charged", she said no.

My discomfort zone with Miers continues to go up...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 08:40 am
From the Washington Times of October 14, 2005 (pages A1 and A16)



http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/3753/wtmiers18yx.th.jpghttp://img440.imageshack.us/img440/1592/wtmiers25yj.th.jpghttp://img440.imageshack.us/img440/8962/wtmiers32pn.th.jpg
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2005 01:25 pm
Blue,
Wanna bet?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Oct, 2005 03:24 pm
mysteryman, no I dont wanna bet. I made it clear in the first post of the thread that this was not my opinion. It aint even what I want. Should Miers fall I'm sure Bushie would placate his right wing nuts with a real hardliner. IMO Bushie let his more religious fanatical constituents down with both Roberts and Miers. I opposed neither.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Guaranteed: Miers to withdraw
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 09:09:26