One interesting thing about childcare is that the expert advice varies from generation to generation. So the "if you pick a baby up every time it cries" advice above is advice that I know a lot of people in my parents' generation followed, and I think this generation turned out OK, overall. ;-)
Meanwhile, the prevailing wisdom today (which is of course subject to being debunked/ adjusted in turn) is that it is impossible to spoil a
baby. A child, yes, but not a baby.
Quote:Few parents make it through their offspring's babyhood without being told that all their efforts to nurture and respond to their baby will surely spoil her. And if it's not spoiling that they're warned against, they're told not to let themselves be "manipulated" by baby. Attachment parenting is not the same as indulgently giving your child everything she asks for. We stress that parents should respond appropriately to their baby's needs, which means knowing when to say "yes" and when to say "no." Sometimes in their zeal to give children everything they need, it's easy for parents to give their children everything they want, and this is indeed harmful. Parents must learn to distinguish between a child's needs and a child's wants.
Yet, telling the difference between needs and wants is not a problem that parents have to wrestle with during their early months of parenting. In the beginning, wants and needs are the same. During the first several months of life, a baby's wants are a baby's needs. A consistent "yes" response teaches babies trust, which will make them more accepting of "no" later on, when they start wanting things they should not have. If you learn to know your baby by responding readily to his needs in the early months, you'll have a good sense of when it's appropriate to say no later on.
New parents often ask, "Won't holding our baby a lot, responding to cries, nursing our baby on cue, and even sleeping with our baby spoil her?" Or they ask if this kind of parenting will create an overly dependent, manipulative child? Our answer is an emphatic no. In fact, both experience and research have shown the opposite. Attachment fosters eventual interdependence. A child whose needs are met predictably and dependably does not have to whine and cry and worry about getting his parents to do what he needs.
-snip-
Attachment studies have spoiled the spoiling theory. Researchers Drs. Bell and Ainsworth at John Hopkins University studied two sets of parents and their children. Group A were attachment-parented babies. These babies were securely attached, the products of responsive parenting. Group B babies were parented n a more restrained way, with a set schedule and given a less intuitive and nurturing response to their cues. All these babies were tracked for at least a year. Which group do you think eventually turned out to be the most independent? Group A, the securely attached babies. Researchers who have studied the affects of parenting styles on children's later outcome have concluded, to put it simply, that the spoiling theory is utter nonsense.
http://www.askdrsears.com/html/10/t100200.asp
That's certainly been borne out in our experience so far. We attended to our baby whenever she cried, anytime, if only to hold her for a while until she calmed down. I have an extremely independent 4.5-year-old, who accepts "no" just fine. Sleeps well through the night and always has, with no crying it out. Etc.
Sometimes I think that the specific method is almost irrelevant, as long as the parenting is done with love and patience. I came to some rather definite conclusions about what I would and wouldn't be doing as a parent and why in the course of getting my master's degree in education, but have found plenty of people who were raised the "wrong" way (note quotes) who turned out beautifully.
So I'm not necessarily saying that the above is the right way -- though it's worked well for us -- just getting that in there.
Hearty agreement on the ASL part -- sozlet's been signing since she was 6 months old, and that helped a ton with reading her cues.
At any rate, summary of how I responded to her cues -- always responded in some way, often well before the crying stage, and just kind of gradually figured out what cue meant what. A lot of it was context -- when was the last time she ate? When was the last time she slept? When was the last time she'd been outside? Etc.
I can try to remember some specific non-crying cues if you'd like, not sure if I'll be able to!